Military leaders want National Guard pulled from LA protests for wildfire duty


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Troop redeployment

U.S. Northern Command has requested the return of 200 National Guard troops from protest duty to help with California’s wildfire response. The troops were part of a federal deployment ordered by President Trump in early June.

Firefighting shortage

California's elite wildfire unit, Joint Task Force Rattlesnake, is operating at 40% capacity due to the federalization of Guard teams. Eight of its 14 crews were reassigned to Los Angeles.

Legal challenge

Gov. Newsom is challenging the legality of Trump’s Title 10 deployment in court. A federal appeals court has allowed the deployment to continue while litigation proceeds.


Full story

The top military commander overseeing National Guard forces in Los Angeles has asked the Trump administration to return 200 troops to California’s wildfire unit, Joint Task Force Rattlesnake. Gen. Gregory Guillot, head of U.S. Northern Command, submitted the request to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, according to multiple U.S. officials who spoke anonymously.

About 4,000 California National Guard members and roughly 700 active-duty Marines were deployed in early June to respond to protests over federal immigration raids. The protests have since decreased in intensity, prompting military leaders to evaluate redeployment options ahead of peak fire season.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

What impact has the deployment had on wildfire response?

California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office says the deployment has left National Guard fire crews operating at 40% of their standard capacity. Eight of the 14 teams in Task Force Rattlesnake have been reassigned to support the protest response in Los Angeles, which Newsom argues undermines the state’s ability to respond to wildfires.

Multiple fires are already burning across Southern California, including the Wolf and Juniper fires in Riverside County, which have scorched more than 3,000 acres combined. In the north, red flag warnings remain in effect due to high temperatures and dry lightning threats.

What has Newsom said about the federal deployment?

Newsom has repeatedly challenged the legality of President Donald Trump’s decision to federalize California’s National Guard under Title 10 authority. Newsom sued and accused Trump of using the Guard for political theater. Although a district court initially sided with California, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals allowed the federal deployment to continue while litigation proceeds.

“We’re glad to see the top military commander overseeing Trump’s illegal militarization of Los Angeles agree: it’s time to pull back National Guard troops and get them back to their critical firefighting duties,” Newsom said in a June 30 statement.

The Trump administration cited Title 10, which permits the president to federalize the Guard in cases of rebellion or if domestic threats impede federal law enforcement. The administration argued immigration agents faced credible threats during arrests in Los Angeles. 

Under Title 10, the president can federalize National Guard troops without a governor’s consent. While orders are routed through governors, their approval is not legally required. Despite the controversy, the president has not invoked the Insurrection Act, and federal courts are still reviewing the deployment’s legality.

Pierce Sharpe (Executive Editor), Jake Larsen (Video Editor), and Drew Pittock (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , ,

Why this story matters

The redeployment of National Guard troops from wildfire response to protest support in California raises concerns about state emergency preparedness, legal authority and the balance of federal and state power.

Emergency preparedness

Reduced National Guard capacity for firefighting, as described by Gov. Newsom's office, highlights the risks to California's ability to respond to wildfires during peak fire season.

Legal authority

The dispute over the federal government's use of Title 10 to deploy the National Guard without a governor's consent underscores ongoing questions about the limits of presidential power and states' rights.

Federal-state relations

Gov. Newsom's legal challenges to the deployment and his statements about federal "political theater" illustrate broader tensions between state and federal governments in managing domestic crises.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 63 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Multiple articles mention that about 4,000 California National Guard troops and 800 active-duty Marines were deployed to Los Angeles. Gov. Newsom warned firefighting capacity was at just 40% because eight out of fourteen National Guard wildfire crews were reassigned. The cost of the 60-day deployment is estimated at $134 million, according to Defense officials.

Community reaction

According to the sources, local California officials — including Gov. Newsom — have expressed concern that National Guard deployments leave wildfire response understaffed. Firefighting agencies and residents in fire-prone areas have heightened anxiety, especially as wildfires begin to spread statewide. Protest groups and immigration rights advocates continue to express opposition to a strong federal response to the demonstrations.

Context corner

The use of National Guard troops under federal authority for domestic unrest is historically rare in California. The federalization of the National Guard bypasses the governor’s authority, a point of ongoing legal contention. Wildfire season in California consistently requires large-scale manpower, and any reassignment of disaster-response resources often generates debate over states’ rights and federal intervention.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left predominantly frame the federal deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles as an “illegal militarization,” highlighting Gov. Newsom’s legal opposition and voicing concern over understaffed wildfire units — describing the troop recall as a necessary correction to an overreach.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right downplay legal challenges and wildfire details, instead portraying the deployment as a justified response to immigration-related unrest, using more pragmatic rhetoric while presenting Trump’s claim of an “invasion” neutrally or positively.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

63 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The top military commander, Gen. Gregory Guillot, requested Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to return 200 troops from protest duty to wildfire fighting duty.
  • President Donald Trump ordered about 4,000 California National Guard troops and 800 active duty Marines to Los Angeles to respond to immigration protests.
  • California Gov. Gavin Newsom expressed concern that the Guard is understaffed due to this deployment amid peak wildfire season.
  • The deployment of federal troops raised legal questions regarding the potential use of emergency powers for law enforcement on U.S. soil.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • In early June, President Donald Trump authorized sending approximately 4,000 California National Guard members along with 800 Marines to Los Angeles to address demonstrations sparked by immigration enforcement actions.
  • The deployment occurred against Gov. Gavin Newsom’s wishes and raised legal questions about the use of emergency powers under the Insurrection Act, which has not been invoked.
  • The Guard troops were assigned to protect federal buildings, causing critical understaffing of California's wildfire-fighting Task Force Rattlesnake during peak fire season.
  • Gen. Gregory Guillot, commander of U.S. Northern Command, asked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to reassign 200 National Guard members from their current protest-related duties back to wildfire response operations, highlighting the strain on available forces.
  • This request highlights tensions between federal and state military control and the need to balance immigration enforcement with wildfire preparedness amid ongoing demonstrations and fires.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The top military commander has requested Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to return 200 troops from protest duty to fight wildfires in California.
  • California is experiencing peak wildfire season with understaffed firefighting units due to troop deployment, according to Gov. Gavin Newsom.
  • The National Guard unit assigned to combat wildfires is operating at only 40% of its regular staffing levels.
  • Newsom has criticized President Trump's federalization of troops.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

Timeline