MO lawmakers aim to reverse abortion rights months after voter approval


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Lawmakers push for ban

Missouri Republican state lawmakers advanced a new ballot proposal that would ban most abortions and undo abortion rights added to the state constitution in 2024.

What the measure does

The measure would allow abortions only in limited cases and also bans public funding for abortion services.

What people said

Critics said the proposal’s language is misleading, while supporters call it a necessary move to protect unborn lives and limit access to gender-affirming care for minors.


Full story

Six months after voters added abortion rights to the Missouri Constitution, Republican lawmakers are pushing a new ballot measure that would let voters overturn that decision and ban most abortions in the state. The proposal, approved by the Missouri Senate on Wednesday, May 14, could go before voters in November 2026. 

The decision might come earlier if Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe calls a special election. The move triggered protests on Thursday, May 15 at the state Capitol.

In November 2024, nearly 52% of Missouri voters passed Amendment 3, which legalized abortion until fetal viability, which is generally considered to be around 21 weeks of pregnancy. The amendment also allows abortions later in pregnancy to protect the life or health of the pregnant woman.

“Missourians support access to abortion,” Mallory Schwarz, executive director of Abortion Action Missouri, said in a statement. “This past November more than 1.5 million Missourians made their voices heard at the ballot box — voting to enshrine abortion rights into the Missouri constitution.”

Despite the change, most medication abortions in Missouri have remained on hold as clinics such as Planned Parenthood work with the state to navigate through new regulations. 

What the new proposal would change

The new proposal, known as HJR 73, would ban all abortions except in cases of medical emergency, rape or incest.

In cases of rape or incest, patients would need to provide documentation from law enforcement and the procedure would be allowed only within the first 12 weeks of pregnancy. The measure also includes a ban on the use of public funds to support abortion services, meaning patients eligible for Medicaid would not be able to use those funds for the procedure.

The resolution states that, “Any person who intentionally or negligently causes damage to another person relating to the provision of prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, miscarriage care or for the performance or inducement of an abortion, shall be liable for damages and shall be subject to the suspension or revocation of his or her medical license.”

Support and opposition from lawmakers and advocates

Republican state Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman helped pass the proposal aimed at repealing Missouri’s abortion-rights constitutional amendment.

“Abortion is the greatest tragedy in the world right now,” Coleman said, according to The Associated Press.

Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America President Marjorie Dannenfelser said in a statement that the organization applauds “the Missouri legislature for passing this pro-life amendment to save lives, protect parents’ rights, and safeguard women and girls.”

“We call on Missouri GOP leaders in Washington and across the state to offer their strong, vocal support of this measure,” Dannenfelser said.

Democrats and reproductive rights advocates argued that the measure’s language is misleading and failed to make clear that it would repeal current abortion protections.

“This deceptive amendment is a Trojan horse to reinstate Missouri’s total abortion ban and all the medically unnecessary restrictions that made access to abortion unattainable prior to the passage of the Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative last November,” Tori Schafer, director of policy and campaigns at the American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri, said in a statement. “Missourians want honesty, respect and access to abortion, but HJR 73 is the antithesis to all of these values. Missourians will vote no on this amendment to stop the abortion ban and protect reproductive freedom.” 

The new ballot measure also includes a provision that would ban gender-affirming care for anyone under 18, including hormone therapy, medication and surgery.

Next steps before legislation reaches voters

HJR 73 must be assigned an amendment number by the governor and an election date has to be announced.

Missouri has seen repeated legal and political shifts on abortion since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022. The state quickly enacted a near-total ban on abortion following that decision. Activist groups successfully fought to reverse the law during the 2024 election.

Missouri’s abortion restrictions led to the quiet construction of a “mega-clinic” on the Illinois side of the Mississippi River near St. Louis.

Cole Lauterbach (Managing Editor), Cassandra Buchman (Digital Producer), and Zachary Hill (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

Why this story matters

In Missouri there’s an ongoing power struggle between voters and lawmakers over reproductive rights, with broader implications for health care access and efforts to challenge constitutional protections.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 50 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Missouri previously performed over 5,000 abortions annually a decade ago. That number shrank to 167 by 2020, according to the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services. This sharp decline is attributed by some abortion providers to increasing state regulations, illustrating how policy can dramatically alter access and services.

Common ground

A shared point in most articles is that this development follows a constitutional amendment approved by Missouri voters in November, which mandates judicial review of previously existing abortion bans or severe restrictions.

History lesson

Missouri’s situation mirrors legal battles in other states and countries following the reversal of Roe v. Wade. The transition from restrictive laws based on older precedents to newly voter-approved reproductive rights protections echoes historical cycles of legal reform and backlash in areas of contentious social policy.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left framed Missouri Republicans’ move to repeal the abortion-rights amendment as a direct affront to voter will and employed charged terms like “attack” while emphasizing Democratic outrage and planned legislative retaliation, thus highlighting the perceived threat to reproductive rights.
  • Media outlets in the center maintained a neutral tone and focused on procedural facts and timeline details without emotive language or partisan framing.
  • Media outlets on the right characterized the referendum as a “pro-life victory” to “protect babies,” casting the prior amendment as “extreme and dangerous” while accusing abortion advocates of deceit and unsafe practices — rhetoric conveying moral urgency and framing the repeal as correcting a crisis.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

50 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Republican state lawmakers in Missouri approved a new referendum to repeal an abortion-rights amendment, aiming to ban most abortions with exceptions for rape and incest.
  • The proposed measure requires voter approval in November 2026 or sooner if called for a special election.
  • Democratic state Sen. Brian Williams expressed outrage over the legislation and claimed that Republicans are "trying to overturn the will of the voters."

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Wednesday, May 14, Republican state lawmakers in Missouri approved a referendum to repeal an abortion-rights amendment passed six months ago.
  • The new constitutional amendment would mostly ban abortions with exceptions for rape or incest up to 12 weeks and for medical emergencies or fetal anomalies.
  • The amendment is scheduled to be on the ballot in November 2026, unless Gov. Mike Kehoe, a Republican, opts to hold a special election to bring the vote forward.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Missouri lawmakers passed a proposed constitutional amendment to replace Amendment 3 with House Joint Resolution 73, which bans abortion with exceptions for the first 12 weeks in cases of rape and incest.
  • The newly proposed amendment would be put before voters in November 2026, or sooner if a special election is called.
  • Protesters expressed their dissatisfaction immediately after the vote, chanting "Stop the ban" as they were ushered out of the state Senate chamber.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™