More GOP college students favor violence to silence voices than Democrat co-eds: Poll


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Student support for violence

According to a new poll by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), there is an increasing number of college students who support the use of violence to shut down speakers, with the trend more pronounced among students identifying as Republicans.

Heckler’s veto trends

The FIRE poll shows rising acceptance of the 'heckler’s veto,' where audience members use shouting to silence a speaker.

Deplatforming activities

FIRE maintains a database that recorded 174 speaker deplatforming attempts last year and 84 so far this year.


Full story

A new poll from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, or FIRE, found that more college students support violence to shut down a speaker than they did in recent years. The 2026 College Free Speech Rankings survey found that number is especially rising amongst students who identify as Republicans.

Speakers and violence

The new survey shows students identifying as Republicans now outnumber Democrats when it comes to justifying violence to stop a speaker.

Specifically, FIRE asked students whether they think it’s ever acceptable to use violence to stop a speaker.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

For Republicans, that number now sits around 35% while it’s around 30% for Democrats. The poll shows Democrats have favored this tactic historically, but that’s changed in recent years.

Students from both parties agreed that using violence is rarely acceptable, but that number has consistently climbed, especially amongst Republicans.

‘The heckler’s veto’

The poll also shows Republicans have embraced the so-called “heckler’s veto” in recent years. That’s when an audience uses shouting to shut down speakers.

For example, students at the University of New Mexico did just that to conservative speaker Tomi Lahren two years ago.

Democrats are still more likely to use that tactic, with the poll showing around 80% of students saying it’s an acceptable tactic at times. That number is 60% for Republicans, but that’s up from under 40% just five years ago.

FIRE keeps a database of these incidents. They found there were 174 deplatforming attempts last year and 84 so far this year.

The latest came just recently as Democratic students at Utah State University push back against an event featuring Charlie Kirk, the founder of conservative student organization Turning Point USA.

What comes next?

This survey comes out as students have just returned to campuses across the country for the fall semester.

That comes amid a rise in partisanship across America.

Recent events have also led to a significant increase in student involvement in political protests over the last year. That includes the violence in the Gaza Strip, which has been a powder keg for student protests and the ensuing pushback from the Trump administration.

Tags: , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

Shifting attitudes among college students toward the acceptability of violence and disruptive tactics in campus speech debates may reflect wider trends in polarization and challenges to free expression in higher education environments.

Campus free speech

Debate over free expression is central to higher education, as changing student attitudes toward speech restrictions and protest tactics shape the atmosphere for discussion and learning on campuses.

Political polarization

Increasing partisanship is reflected in the survey findings, suggesting that support for disruptive tactics to silence opposing voices now spans both major political affiliations.

Use of disruptive tactics

Rising support for violence and 'heckler’s veto' approaches among college students highlights evolving strategies used to protest or suppress controversial speakers, raising questions about acceptable boundaries in campus activism.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more