Murdoch to give Trump health updates in deal to delay deposition in WSJ case


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Legal battle

President Trump is suing Rupert Murdoch over a Wall Street Journal article linking him to Jeffrey Epstein.

Delayed deposition

A new filing revealed Murdoch will agree to provide regular health updates to delay being deposed in the case.

Approval likely

A judge still needs to approve the deal, but approval is likely since both sides agreed to it.


Full story

Rupert Murdoch has agreed to provide regular health updates to President Donald Trump’s legal team as part of a deal to delay his deposition in Trump’s $10 billion libel lawsuit. Murdoch — who controls Wall Street Journal parent company News Corp — is being sued by Trump over a recent article that claimed he sent a birthday letter to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a claim Trump denies.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

According to a court filing jointly submitted by Trump and Murdoch’s legal teams, Murdoch must submit a sworn declaration within three days of the judge approving the deal, detailing his current health condition. He also agreed to a system that will notify Trump’s team of any significant changes to his health.

“Defendant Murdoch has further agreed to provide regularly scheduled updates to Plaintiff regarding his health, including a mechanism for him to alert the Plaintiff if there is a material change to his health,” the filing states.

The agreement emerged after Trump’s lawyers pushed for an expedited deposition, warning in a court filing that Murdoch’s age and declining health might prevent him from testifying later in the case.

“Murdoch is 94 years old, has suffered from multiple health issues throughout his life, is believed to have suffered recent significant health scares… Taken together, these factors weigh heavily in determining that Murdoch would be unavailable for in-person testimony at trial,” the filing states.

The new agreement delays Murdoch’s deposition until after the judge decides whether to toss out the case. If the lawsuit moves forward, Murdoch would have 30 days to sit for questioning. If Murdoch doesn’t comply with the new terms, the agreement requires him to sit for an “expedited” deposition.

Lawsuit stems from Journal story over Epstein

The legal battle stems from a Wall Street Journal report that claimed Trump sent Epstein a “bawdy” birthday card in 2003. Trump denies writing the card and sued Murdoch, News Corp CEO Robert Thomson, Dow Jones & Co., and the two Journal reporters who wrote the article.

While Murdoch’s media empire — particularly Fox News — has long been seen as an ally of Trump, the lawsuit marks increased tensions between Trump and the mainstream media.

Judge likely to approve new agreement

The judge still needs to approve the agreement, but both sides have signed off, making approval more likely. 
Neither Murdoch nor Trump is likely to be deposed in the case for months, according to Politico’s Josh Gerstein, who first reported on Monday’s filing, Aug. 4.

Tags: , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The agreement to postpone Rupert Murdoch's deposition in President Donald Trump's libel lawsuit over a Wall Street Journal article highlights tensions between high-profile media and political figures and could impact legal, media and political dynamics moving forward.

Legal maneuvering

The story illustrates ongoing legal strategies, with both parties agreeing to delay depositions and discovery until the court decides on the motion to dismiss, which could set a procedural precedent in high-profile defamation cases.

Defamation and public figures

The case centers on the issue of defamation and what qualifies as defamatory reporting about public figures, raising questions about journalistic standards and the limits of press freedom when reporting on allegations involving prominent individuals.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

25 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Donald Trump and Rupert Murdoch have agreed to delay Murdoch's deposition in Trump's libel lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal over a published story about Trump and Jeffrey Epstein.
  • Court filings reveal that the agreement involves not engaging in discovery until The Wall Street Journal's motion to dismiss is resolved.
  • Murdoch will provide updates on his health status; otherwise, he may face an expedited deposition.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Monday evening, President Donald Trump and Wall Street Journal owner Rupert Murdoch agreed to postpone Murdoch's deposition until after the Journal's motion to dismiss the $10 billion defamation lawsuit is heard.
  • Last month, President Donald Trump filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit after the Journal reported he sent Epstein a 'bawdy' birthday letter, which Trump denies as 'fake'.
  • Under the stipulation, Murdoch must provide a sworn health declaration within three days, and if the motion fails, he shall be deposed in person within 30 days at a mutually agreed location.
  • Despite citing Murdoch’s health, Trump agreed to drop his request for an expedited deposition, with failure to update triggers an immediate deposition.
  • The potential wait for depositions could span several months, as judges may take time to rule on the dismissal motion, amid criticism over Epstein investigative files.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

Timeline

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.