National Guard in Illinois can stay under federal control, can’t be deployed: Court


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

National Guard sent to Illinois

More than 500 National Guard troops were sent to the Chicago area. A federal appeals court upheld a judge's ruling blocking their deployment, but allowed them to stay under federal control.

Judge's ruling

In her order temporarily halting the troops' deployment, U.S. Judge April Perry said there's "been no showing that the civil power has failed" in Chicago and having the military there is "not called for."

National Guard in other cities

The Trump administration sent National Guard troops to other cities, and faced legal challenges in them as well.


Full story

A federal appeals court is letting the National Guard troops sent to Illinois by President Donald Trump stay under federal control, but it also ruled Saturday they cannot be deployed for now. This comes after a federal judge blocked the Guard’s deployment on Thursday.

“Members of the National Guard do not need to return to their home states unless further ordered by a court to do so,” the court said in its Saturday ruling.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Using the military is ‘not called for’

U.S. District Judge April Perry, in her own decision on Thursday, granted a motion temporarily putting the deployment on hold as the case continues in court.

“There has been no showing that the civil power has failed,” Perry said in her opinion, according to The Associated Press. “The agitators who have violated the law by attacking federal authorities have been arrested. The courts are open, and the marshals are ready to see that any sentences of imprisonment are carried out.”

Resorting to using the military to carry out these laws “is not called for,” Perry added. Citing “huge increases in arrests and deportations,” Perry said there’s a good amount of evidence that federal agents have been able to do their work.

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker celebrated the judge’s ruling Thursday night, saying that Trump “is not a king — and his administration is not above the law.”

“Today, the court confirmed what we all know: there is no credible evidence of a rebellion in the state of Illinois,” he said. “And no place for the National Guard in the streets of American cities like Chicago.”

The 500 Guard members, who came from both Illinois and Texas, arrived in the Chicago area earlier this week. Most were based at a U.S. Army Reserve Center in the suburban village of Elwood, while others were taken to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) building in another suburb, Broadview.

Trump has attempted to send National Guard troops to other cities, such as Washington, D.C. and Portland. However, much like Chicago, these deployments faced legal challenges.

The president used crime in these cities to justify sending in federalized troops, and even indicated in October he’d be open to using the Insurrection Act if courts or local officials prevent him from doing so.

“If people were being killed and courts were holding us up, or governors or mayors were holding us up, sure I’d do that,” Trump said.

However, residents and officials in these cities maintain that crime rates are falling and that local law enforcement is already equipped to handle protests.

Tags: , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A federal court's decision on the deployment and control of National Guard troops in Illinois highlights ongoing legal debates over federal authority, the use of military personnel in domestic situations and the balance of state and federal powers.

Federal vs. state authority

The case underscores the ongoing tension between federal and state governments regarding control over National Guard deployments and the appropriate circumstances for federal intervention within states.

Legal limits on military deployment

Judicial rulings in this case emphasize the legal constraints on using military forces domestically and the standards that must be met for such interventions under U.S. law.

Public safety and law enforcement

The debate centers around whether local law enforcement is sufficient to maintain order or if federal forces are warranted, reflecting broader questions about public safety, crime and the roles of government agencies.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 60 media outlets

Context corner

The Insurrection Act allows a president to deploy military forces domestically under certain circumstances. Legal debates focus on what constitutes a sufficient danger for such a measure, referencing historical documents like the Federalist Papers, as noted by Judge Perry.

Debunking

There is no evidence presented supporting a "danger of rebellion" in Illinois, as claimed by the administration. Judge Perry cited a lack of credible evidence and pointed out that federal law enforcement was functioning and handling arrests and deportations.

Policy impact

The temporary court rulings limit the federal government’s ability to intervene with military forces in states without clear evidence of civil disorder, impacting how immigration enforcement and civil protest are managed in Democratic-led areas.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

135 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • An appeals court ruled that National Guard troops in Illinois can remain under federal control but cannot be deployed to protect federal property or patrol due to a lack of evidence for a "danger of rebellion" in Illinois, according to Judge April Perry's ruling.
  • Perry found no substantial evidence that the National Guard was necessary to enforce federal law in Illinois.
  • The Trump administration's request to deploy the National Guard was blocked following a federal judge's decision that there was no credible evidence justifying their deployment.
  • The appeals court issued a temporary stay on a previous district court ruling until further arguments can be heard, but National Guard members in Illinois are not permitted to be deployed.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • National Guard troops sent to Illinois by President Donald Trump can stay in the state and under federal control, but can't be deployed to protect federal property or go on patrol for now, an appeals court ruled Saturday.
  • The judge said there was significant evidence that federal agents have been able to carry out their work, noting huge increases in arrests and deportations.
  • Members of the National Guard do not need to return to their home states unless further ordered by a court to do so, the order says.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

Timeline

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.