NATO weighs increasing defense spending to 5% under US pressure


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Spending surge

NATO members are negotiating a proposal to increase defense spending to 5% of GDP by 2032, driven by U.S. pressure. The plan would mark the alliance’s largest investment since the Cold War.

Budget breakdown

The proposed target includes 3.5% for core military spending and 1.5% for related infrastructure, cybersecurity and dual-use systems. Verification mechanisms are under discussion.

Summit spotlight

President Trump’s return to the NATO summit in June will likely focus on defense burden-sharing, not Ukraine’s membership. Some members remain skeptical about meeting the goal.


Full story

NATO members are working on a proposal to raise defense spending to 5% of gross domestic product by 2032. Though still under negotiation, the effort would mark the largest military investment by the alliance since the Cold War. None of NATO’s 32 members, including the United States, currently meet that threshold.

During the week of May 4, Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof told reporters that the plan includes a 3.5% baseline for core defense budgets and an additional 1.5% for related areas like infrastructure, cybersecurity and military mobility.

NATO foreign ministers will likely discuss the framework during the week of May 11 in Antalya, Turkey, with a formal proposal likely at the June summit in The Hague.

When asked about the numbers, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte did not confirm what the new numbers might be, saying, “I’m not going to confirm the figures. There are many rumors floating around,” according to a report by The Associated Press.

How does this differ from NATO’s current goal?

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

The U.S. ranks third among top military spenders in the NATO alliance, spending 3.19% of GDP. Others top countries include Poland (4.09%) and Estonia (3.41%).

NATO’s long-standing benchmark has been 2% of GDP. According to the alliance’s annual report, 22 NATO members had hit the 2% spending target by 2024, up from just three in 2014. Poland (4.07%), Estonia (3.41%) and the U.S. (3.19%) remain among the top contributors. The report states that European allies and Canada have added more than $700 billion in defense spending over the past decade.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly criticized allies for underfunding their militaries and warned that failing to meet targets could weaken America’s commitment to the alliance. The Trump administration has publicly pushed NATO allies to raise spending to 5%, with U.S. NATO Ambassador Matthew Whitaker calling it a “necessity for our security.”

“The alliance is facing significant threats, as all of you know, and we must be prepared to meet them head-on. That level of investment is necessary to ensure allies have the capabilities to deter and defend the alliance, and contribute to our collective defense.” Whitaker said during a press briefing. “President Trump has been unwavering in his commitment to our collective security and he has fundamentally changed the conversation on defense investment at NATO.”

What counts toward the additional 1.5%?

Ministers will also debate what types of spending qualify under the extra 1.5%. Options under review include spending on dual-use technologies, cyber defense and defense-related infrastructure. It remains unclear whether this spending must be new or if it can consist of current expenditures repurposed under broader defense classifications.

Whitaker said this component must “be defense-related,” but added that it goes beyond traditional equipment like tanks and artillery.

What role does the US play in shaping this effort?

The proposed 5% plan aligns closely with Trump’s long-standing demands for a greater share of the burden from European allies. U.S. officials have said the imbalance in defense contributions undermines alliance cohesion and effectiveness. In previous comments, Trump even suggested allowing Russia to act against countries that fail to meet spending commitments.

The Hague summit will be Trump’s first as president since returning to office, and diplomats expect the session to focus heavily on spending and industrial readiness, not Ukraine’s potential NATO membership, which has stalled.

How realistic is the 2032 deadline?

European officials acknowledge that hitting the 5% target in seven years will be difficult. Several countries have only recently reached the 2% mark, and rapidly scaling budgets would require political and economic overhauls. However, proponents argue that increasing threats from Russia and the need to deter future conflicts make investment necessary.

Defense ministers are scheduled to review a classified set of capability targets during May in Brussels. The review could guide the formal adoption of the new spending pledge at the June 24–25 summit.

Mathew Grisham (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

NATO members are considering a major increase in defense spending targets that could reshape alliance responsibilities and influence transatlantic security policy ahead of upcoming summits.

US influence

The United States, particularly under President Donald Trump, has pushed for greater European defense contributions, which may affect NATO's internal unity and the relationship among allies.

Changing security threats

Citing increased dangers from Russia and other sources, NATO officials justify higher investments as necessary to deter new threats and strengthen collective defense capabilities.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 39 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Current NATO defense spending targets require 2% of GDP, achieved by only 22 out of 32 allies. Trump’s proposed 5% would more than double current goals, representing the largest post-Cold War increase in Western military spending.

Context corner

NATO’s original 2% target was established in 2014 after the annexation of Crimea, aiming to ensure common defense spending standards. A move to 5% is part of a broader response to Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine and growing concerns about European security.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left framed the NATO defense spending push as a problematic legacy of Trump’s disruptive diplomacy, emphasizing his unprecedented 5% GDP demand as unrealistic and destabilizing, often highlighting his fracturing of alliance unity with terms like “pressure” and “undermining.”
  • Media outlets in the center remained more detached and strategic, emphasizing diplomatic balancing acts and gradual transitions.
  • Media outlets on the right casted Trump’s insistence as a necessary, tough stance forcing reluctant European allies to finally meet security obligations, using assertive language such as “risk,” and “keep Trump happy” to portray the spending boost as essential and overdue.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

39 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • NATO is planning to meet President Donald Trump's demand for member countries to spend 5% of their GDP on defense, according to U.S. envoy Matthew Whitaker.
  • As of 2024, 24 of NATO's 32 members meet the existing 2% target, but several nations, including Italy and Canada, still fall short.
  • Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof reported that NATO leaders aim for 3.5% military spending by 2032, plus 1.5% for related areas.
  • NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte emphasized the necessity of increased spending to ensure security against threats like Russia, highlighting the urgency of the situation.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • NATO foreign ministers are meeting on Wednesday and Thursday in Antalya to discuss increasing defense spending ahead of a June summit in The Hague.
  • The meeting responds to U.S. President Trump's demand for NATO to spend 5% of GDP on defense, a target no current member, including the U.S., meets.
  • Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte has proposed raising direct military spending to 3.5% of GDP by 2032, combined with a 1.5% allowance for related defense costs like infrastructure and cybersecurity.
  • According to Matthew Whitaker, the plan for new investments extends beyond just equipment to include areas such as mobility, infrastructure, and cyber security, with the goal of ensuring allied forces face no defensive gaps.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The Trump administration is urging NATO members to increase defense spending to 5% of GDP ahead of a foreign ministers meeting.
  • U.S. NATO Ambassador Matthew Whitaker confirmed that Washington expects allies to present plans to meet this target.
  • Currently, only 22 of NATO's 32 members meet the existing defense spending goal of 2% of GDP established in 2023.
  • NATO leaders are set to establish new spending targets at a summit in The Hague on June 25.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™