New Eaton Fire video renews questions about criminal liability for SoCal Edison


This recording was made using enhanced software.

What happens when a corporation causes a fire that leaves nearly two dozen people dead? That’s a question that we could soon get an answer to in Southern California.

New video appears to show lines from power company SoCal Edison caused the Eaton Fire in Los Angeles.

That fire killed 19 people and destroyed nearly 10,000 structures.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

New video

New surveillance video shows an old SoCal Edison electrical line ignited a fire around the time the wildfire started.

The footage came from a closed-circuit TV from a nearby swim and tennis club in Pasadena.

In the video, you can see two flashes of light just after 6 p.m. on Jan. 7, 2025. That’s according to new court filings.

Those flashes happened at the same time the utility recorded two faults on another transmission line more than five miles away.

Shortly after that, people nearby reported a fire burning at the base of one of the utility’s towers.

That grew into the Eaton fire, which devastated parts of Altadena and Pasadena.

Utility liability

“The Eaton Fire could not have occurred if SCE had simply disassembled and removed Structure M16T1,” the lawyers wrote in the filing, according to the Los Angeles Times.

Those lawyers represent property insurers that paid out tens of millions of dollars to residents who lost their homes.

They aim to make SoCal Edison liable for the fire.

A legal doctrine in California’s state constitution requires utilities like Edison to pay for any property they destroy, even if they’re not found negligent.

“Most frequently it’s the familiar mechanism of tort law, where civil lawsuits are brought by those who have been injured by a fire,” Lawrence Rosenthal, law professor at Chapman University, told Straight Arrow.

SCE faces numerous other lawsuits.

That includes a wrongful death lawsuit, a suit from LA County and even a suit from the Trump administration.

So far, these are all civil lawsuits.

Despite killing nearly two dozen people, no criminal charges have been filed. The Los Angeles County District Attorney is considering that.

“If the negligence is sufficiently aggravated to satisfy the definition of criminal negligence in California law, then there could, theoretically be an involuntary manslaughter charge,” Rosenthal said.

Companies clearly can’t go to prison, but there have been cases where corporate executives have gone to prison for negligence.

The former CEO of Massey Energy spent a year behind bars for a deadly mining accident, while a former peanut executive received a 28-year-sentence for a nationwide salmonella outbreak.

“When it comes to executives, they would be in the same position as any other criminal defendant,” Rosenthal said. “The prosecutor would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a particular executive exhibited criminal negligence, and that criminal negligence proximately caused the death of one or more human beings.”

SoCal Edison has not taken responsibility for the fire.

Impact on consumers

SCE dominates the electricity space in Los Angeles. They serve some 11 million people over roughly 50-thousand square miles.

Companies like that can’t just go out of business despite apparently causing a massive fire.

“A regulated utility really can’t go out of business, precisely because it’s the only way that a lot of people can get their electricity in Southern California,” Rosenthal said.

However, the company may have to pay tens of millions of dollars in fines.

That money has to come from somewhere. Often, it falls on the consumers.

“The perverse effect of corporate criminal liability in a regulated utility like this is that the most likely effect is to raise the cost to ratepayers,” Rosenthal said.

Because they have to pay the fines and because going out of business is not an option, that could force regulators to allow SCE to raise those rates.

That’s already happening.

SCE, along with Pacific Gas & Electric and San Diego Gas and Electric, have been authorized to raise rates due to wildfires. That includes paying off fines, replacing equipment, and paying out damages.

Some people’s utility bills are 20% higher due to the fallout from wildfires.

“The lawsuits in these contexts don’t really punish the utility so much as they punish the ratepayers,” Rosenthal said. “So, you get into a vicious cycle where the greater the liability the utility faces, the higher the price of electricity.”


Round out your reading

Tags: , ,

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

New surveillance footage and court filings link SoCal Edison's equipment to the Eaton Fire, placing the utility at the center of civil and potentially criminal liability that, according to a law professor, is likely to raise electricity costs for its 11 million customers.

Utility bills already rising

SCE has been authorized to raise rates to cover wildfire-related costs, and some customers are already paying bills 20% higher, according to the article.

Ratepayers absorb liability costs

According to a Chapman University law professor, fines and damages imposed on regulated utilities like SCE are typically passed on to customers through higher rates, not absorbed by the company.

Criminal charges still unresolved

The LA County District Attorney is considering criminal charges, but as of the article's publication no charges have been filed despite 19 deaths attributed to the fire.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 3 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Edison has extended nearly 1,900 settlement offers totaling more than $650 million to roughly 10,000 claimants. The company anticipates reimbursement from a $21 billion state fund created by AB 1054, and Edison's customer rates have risen 101% over the last decade.

Community reaction

Many fire victims have refused Edison's settlement offers, saying the compensation does not fully cover their losses. The L.A. County District Attorney's Office is also investigating whether Edison should face criminal prosecution.

Context corner

A 2001 proposed state rule would have required utilities to remove idle lines unless future use could be proven, but Edison and other utilities lobbied to weaken it, allowing lines to remain until executives deemed them 'permanently abandoned.'

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

3 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

  • No coverage from Other sources 0 sources

Powered by Ground News™