New Jersey mayors consider legal action against turnpike expansion


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Mayors plan action

Hoboken Mayor Ravi Bhalla and Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop plan to challenge the New Jersey Turnpike expansion in court, citing environmental and civil rights concerns.

Coast Guard decision

The mayors' opposition follows a U.S. Coast Guard ruling that the project poses no significant environmental harm.

Arguments for and against

Critics argue the expansion will worsen pollution, while supporters said it will create union jobs.


Full story

Hoboken Mayor Ravi Bhalla said he’s considering taking legal action in the form of a civil rights lawsuit against the New Jersey Turnpike Authority. Bhalla said this is an effort to prevent the planned expansion of the turnpike, PIX11 News reported.

Jersey City Mayor Steven Michael Fulop also announced Wednesday, May 14, at the “Rage Against the Turnpike” rally that his city will challenge the project in court, according to the Jersey City Times.

“If you care about health, if you care about the environment, if you care about mass transit, it would lead you to the conclusion that this project is wrong for New Jersey,” Fulop said, as reported by the news outlet.

Federal protections revoked

The litigation comes after a finding by the U.S. Coast Guard that the first phase of the turnpike expansion project would not cause significant environmental harm. The Coast Guard issued permits for the first phase of the project in early May.

The Coast Guard’s decision came shortly after the Trump administration revoked protections in January 2025 meant to prevent environmental harm in minority and low-income communities.

Critics suggested that removing those protections may have influenced the Coast Guard’s decision and made it easier for the project to move forward without a more thorough environmental review.

Bhalla denounces expansion

Bhalla said he’s been the target of political attacks over his opposition to the turnpike project.

“There’s a reason the special interest groups that are pushing the turnpike expansion boondoggle are spending six figures in negative mailers against me — and it’s because in the legislature I will do everything in my power to end this senseless $11 billion highway expansion,” Bhalla posted on X on Tuesday, May 13. “We need to invest in our crumbling mass transit infrastructure, and end this project that will cause more traffic and harm our environment. Why is this so complicated?”

The project also includes repairs to the Newark Bay Bridge. While Bhalla said existing infrastructure is in need of updates, he added that people are “conflating that with the expansion issue.”

Despite the New Jersey Turnpike Authority moving forward with early-stage contracts, the project faces mounting resistance.

Local residents, environmental justice groups and city officials oppose the plan. Critics contend it would worsen pollution in already overburdened communities.

However, New Jersey Assemblyman William Sampson advocated for the turnpike expansion and said it could provide union work for laborers, Jersey City Times reported.

The New Jersey Turnpike Authority said the expansion will not cause more pollution or congestion.

Harry Fogle (Video Editor) and Cassandra Buchman (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , ,

Why this story matters

Legal and political challenges to the New Jersey Turnpike expansion highlight debates over environmental justice, public health and infrastructure priorities in impacted communities.

Environmental justice

Concerns have been raised that the turnpike expansion could worsen pollution in already overburdened, often minority and low-income, communities, particularly after federal protections were revoked.

Infrastructure priorities

Debate continues over whether investment should prioritize expanding highways for potential economic and labor benefits or focus on repairing existing infrastructure and improving mass transit, as argued by various local officials and advocates.