New lawsuit accuses Max Miller of sharing sensitive photo of daughter online


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Full story

Rep. Max Miller’s former wife, who two weeks ago accused the Ohio Republican of abuse, alleges in a new lawsuit that the lawmaker and his attorney “recklessly published” a nude image of Miller’s 2-year-old daughter online. 

Miller’s ex-wife, Emily Moreno, filed the lawsuit Wednesday. It adds to her previous accusations that Miller threw hot water on her and put a gun to her head and that their daughter’s collarbone was fractured while Miller was watching her. 

QR code for SAN app download

Download the Straight Arrow app today to get the stories that matter free from manipulation, bias or agenda.™

Point phone camera here

Moreno’s new lawsuit against Miller

The new lawsuit stems from a livestream Miller did on social media earlier this month, when he defended himself against the domestic abuse allegations. During the livestream on X, he released a trove of documents through a public Dropbox account. 

Here is a Dropbox with all the records I referenced today,” he said. “I invite everyone who is interested to take a look.”

Moreno’s lawsuit claims that among the documents was a picture of their daughter, in which her genitalia was visible. She said it was available for anyone to download for 23 hours. 

“Miller’s recklessness is underscored by the fact that any parent knows — in this era and world filled with pedophiles, creeps, and AI-generated image alteration and video generation — not to put nude pictures of their child, or any child, on the public internet,” Moreno wrote in the suit.

Moreno is seeking $150,000 in damages for each time the photo was downloaded from the Dropbox account, saying it was viewed more than 200,000  times. 

“This child is an entirely innocent victim who has become collateral damage to her father’s political ambition,” Moreno’s attorney, Subodh Chandra, said in a statement. 

Miller’s attorney responds to photo

Moreno’s lawsuit also included a statement from Miller’s attorney, Aaron Minc, sent after the photo was taken down. He apologized for the photo, writing that he inadvertently published an unedited version of the photo but deleted it as soon as he found out. 

He also shared a statement with Politico, taking responsibility for the photo and calling its publication “completely unintentional and a mistake.” 

“I am solely responsible for what happened,” Minc said. “I was the only person responsible for assembling, creating, reviewing, adding, deleting, redacting, or making any changes to the information and files that were in this folder.”

He apologized to Miller and Moreno, but said Moreno was creating “a media spectacle regarding this unfortunate mistake … as a means to try to gain leverage in court and distract from the underlying evidence that exonerates Mr. Miller from the false allegations he is accused of.”

He disputed Chandra’s claim that the photo included the child’s genitalia.

“A 2-year-old girl had her shirt off,” he told Politico. Saying that alleging the photo amounted to child sexual abuse material “is a deliberately false, sensationalized, and disgusting characterization.”

Calls for Miller’s resignation

Since the domestic abuse allegations came to light earlier this month, Miller has faced calls for his resignation, including from other Republicans — including Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, his former father-in-law.

However, Miller has vowed to stay in the race for a third term in Ohio’s 7th Congressional District. As Straight Arrow previously reported, Miller said he will lend his campaign $1 million.

“I am invested in this election in every way,” he said, “and I will invest the resources into my campaign to win.”

Round out your reading

Tags: , ,

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A federal lawsuit filed against a sitting U.S. congressman illustrates how a federal law barring nonconsensual disclosure of intimate images applies to minors and carries per-download financial liability, and it puts Ohio's 7th Congressional District race in direct legal and electoral uncertainty.

Federal law invoked per download

The lawsuit invokes 15 U.S.C. § 6851, which sets $150,000 in statutory damages for each disclosure or transfer of an intimate image — meaning total liability scales with how many times the file was accessed, a figure the suit says defendants have refused to provide.

Ohio race now a toss-up

Cook Political Report now rates Ohio's 7th Congressional District a toss-up, according to the articles, after previously favoring Miller — and the deadline to replace him on the November ballot has passed.

House Ethics probe underway

The House Ethics Committee opened an investigation into Miller this month, at his own request, into allegations of domestic violence and illegal drug use; results are pending.

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the lawsuit as political “scandal,” calling Miller “embattled” and the alleged release “incomprehensible recklessness,” while stressing Republican identity and electoral vulnerability.
  • Media outlets in the center use “sensitive” and “accidental,” foregrounding attribution and due process.
  • Media outlets on the right emphasize legal exposure—whether defendants “violated federal laws”—and graphic allegations involving the child and domestic abuse, portraying the case as “yet another legal battle” rather than primarily partisan fallout.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

27 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Emily Moreno sued Max Miller and his attorney for posting a nude photo of their 2-year-old daughter online during Miller's defense against abuse allegations.
  • The lawsuit alleges that Miller and his attorney recklessly shared the photo and other sensitive information publicly, violating federal and state privacy laws.
  • Miller admitted the photo was posted due to an error and apologized, stating the mistake occurred under pressure to restore file access quickly.
  • Moreno seeks $150,000 in damages for emotional distress and reputational harm under federal and state laws.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Wednesday, Emily Moreno filed a federal civil-rights lawsuit against Representative Max Miller, Aaron Minc, and Minc LLC, alleging they recklessly published an unredacted nude photograph of her 2-year-old daughter.
  • During a live broadcast on Twitter on August 2, 2026, Miller distributed a public Dropbox link, urging viewers to "take a look at the documents" containing sensitive materials to defend against domestic abuse allegations.
  • Minc initially configured the Dropbox folder with public editor permissions, and the child's name appeared unredacted more than 70 times while the intimate image remained accessible online for approximately 23 hours.
  • Seeking $150,000 per disclosure under federal statute 15 U.S.C. § 6851, the lawsuit includes a pediatrician's confirmation that the photo depicts genitalia, contradicting Minc's media claims the child was partially clothed.
  • After initial viewers deleted files, Minc restored the folder and republished the image under pressure, though Miller and Minc have refused repeated requests to provide download logs documenting the exposure's scope.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Emily Moreno sued Ohio GOP Rep. Max Miller for recklessly publishing a nude photo of their two-year-old daughter online in a publicly shared Dropbox folder.
  • The Dropbox folder containing the photo was accessed by over 400,000 people, according to Moreno's lawsuit.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™