New prosecutor takes over Georgia’s long-delayed election interference case against Trump


Summary

Prosecutors takes over case

Prosecutor Peter Skandalakis will head the case against President Donald Trump and others, replacing Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.

Case's future unknown

It was not immediately known how the case would proceed. But Skandalakis signaled it has captivated enough public attention to warrant a continuation.

Judge quashes three charges

A judge in Atlanta quashed three charges against the 15 defendants related to filing false documents.


Full story

A new prosecutor will preside over a Georgia election interference case that led to President Donald Trump, Rudy Giuliani and others facing racketeering charges over their attempts to “find” enough votes to swing the state to Trump in the 2020 presidential election. The new prosecutor hasn’t yet signaled how the case will proceed.

Peter Skandalakis, executive director of the nonpartisan Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council of Georgia, appointed himself as lead prosecutor on the case after he said other prosecutors declined appointment. The Georgia Supreme Court recently upheld the disqualification of Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis because of alleged improprieties with a special prosecutor, according to CNN.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Skandalakis said he received 101 boxes of documents related to the investigation on Oct. 29 and an eight-terabyte hard drive the following week with complete investigative files. He has yet to complete his review of the files, but he took on the case as a Friday deadline set by Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee to find a new prosecutor rapidly approached.

“If a replacement wasn’t found, McAfee would have dismissed the case,” the prosecutor wrote.

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

President Donald Trump and several co-defendants were charged with racketeering for attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election in Georgia.

“The public has a legitimate interest in the outcome of this case,” Slandalakis said in a Friday release. “Accordingly, it is important that someone make an informed and transparent determination about how best to proceed. Given my prior familiarity with portions of the case file, including my earlier involvement in the related matter involving Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, I made the decision to assign the case to myself.”

That is likely in reference to his decision in 2024 not to charge Jones, then a senator and now a candidate for governor, in Trump’s case.

The charges, filed in 2023 under Georgia’s anti-racketeering law, originate from a sweeping investigation by Willis’ office, according to The Associated Press. The charges reflected allegations the group participated in a conspiracy to overturn Trump’s loss to Joe Biden in Georgia.

Lawyer John Charles Eastman, who is charged in the case, wrote on X that he hoped Skandalakis would “do the right thing and dismiss this travesty.” 

Fifteen people charged with racketeering

According to Fulton County Superior Court records, Willis charged Trump and 14 co-defendants with racketeering and a number of other crimes. 

Those charged included:

  • Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani.
  • Lawyer John Charles Eastman.
  • Trump’s former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows.
  • Office of Management and Budget acting administrator Jeffrey Clark.
  • Lawyer Ray Stallings Smith III.
  • Lawyer Robert David Cheeley.
  • Former Trump 2020 campaign official Michael A. Roman.
  • Georgia Republican Party Emeritus Chair David James Shaker.
  • Republican Georgia State Sen. Shawn Micah Tresher Still.
  • Pastor Stephen Ciffgard Lee.
  • Former Trump 2020 campaign staffer Harrison William Prescott Floyd.
  • Publicist Tevian Kutti.
  • Political activist Cathleen Alston Latham.
  • Former Coffee County, Georgia, Election Supervisor Misty Hampton.

McAfee quashed charges Friday for criminal attempt to commit filing false documents, conspiracy of such and filing false documents from the defendants, according to court documents.

Trump issued pardons for all 14 co-defendants and other associates on Nov. 9 to wipe their criminal records free of offenses relating to the 2020 election. But his pardon is only effective for federal charges. 

They all remained charged in Georgia. State law does not allow governors to issue pardons, and Gov. Brian Kemp, a Republican, is not involved in the case.

Alan Judd and Ally Heath contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A new lead prosecutor has been appointed to oversee the Georgia election interference case involving President Donald Trump and others, affecting the progress and future of a prominent legal dispute over the 2020 election results.

Prosecutorial appointment

Peter Skandalakis has assumed control of the case after the previous prosecutor was disqualified, directly impacting the direction and handling of one of the most closely watched cases in the country.

Election interference allegations

The case involves serious accusations regarding efforts by Trump and associates to overturn Georgia's 2020 election results, raising important questions about electoral integrity and accountability.

Legal process and transparency

As stated by Skandalakis, public interest warrants a transparent and informed process, emphasizing the importance of clarity and due process in high-profile legal proceedings.

Get the big picture

Context corner

The underlying case stems from actions alleged after the 2020 presidential election when claims of election interference led to charges under Georgia’s racketeering law. The original prosecutor, Fani Willis, was disqualified after a conflict of interest ruling due to her relationship with a special prosecutor she hired.

History lesson

The use of state-level RICO statutes against public officials and political figures has precedents but is rare, making this case historically notable for its scope and participants.

Policy impact

The case’s handling influences how future conflicts of interest and prosecutorial conduct are evaluated in high-stakes political prosecutions, potentially shaping policies for replacing conflicted prosecutors statewide.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

110 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.