Newsom, Trump at odds, both threaten to withhold billions in funding


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Federal-state funding dispute

The Trump administration and the state of California are in a financial standoff, with both sides threatening to leverage funding against the other.

Title IX

Education Secretary Linda McMahon claims that California is violating federal Title IX protections due to the participation of a transgender athlete, who recently won two girls’ state titles in high school track and field.

Escalating tensions

The funding threats and public exchanges reflect ongoing and deepening conflict between the Trump administration and California's leadership over state and federal policy priorities.


Full story

The Trump administration and the state of California are locked in another dispute, with both sides threatening each other financially. The latest funding threats come as the two sides are on a collision course over state and federal policies.

Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in a June 10 interview with Bloomberg News that California is in violation of federal Title IX protections. The statement follows a transgender athlete’s recent win of two state titles in a California high school girls’ track and field competition.

“We have men participating in women’s sports, which is clearly against Title IX, and the president has made it very clear that he is going to uphold Title IX,” McMahon said. “When we’re seeing violations, we want to make sure we’re addressing them because if we don’t address them as they occur then it’s sort of by acquiescence that it’s okay to continue, and it’s not.”

The California Interscholastic Federation later changed its rules, allowing competitors who were born female to qualify in certain competitions if losing to a trans athlete means disqualification.

California receives $8 billion in federal education funding

McMahon suggested that one possible consequence for California’s alleged noncompliance would be revoking federal education funding. California receives nearly $8 billion annually from the U.S. Department of Education.

While it remains unclear which specific programs or amounts are under review, McMahon warned that federal funding is at risk under current circumstances.

“That is one of the tools and the opportunities that we have with California,” McMahon said. “I think it’s right that we make them aware that that is a risk that they run.”

Newsom issues threat in response

In response to the administration’s reported plans, Newsom issued a pointed warning of his own, suggesting that California may consider withholding federal tax payments.

“Californians pay the bills for the federal government,” Newsom wrote in a post on X. “We pay over $80 BILLION more in taxes than we get back. Maybe it’s time to cut that off.”

California Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas backed Newsom’s idea that the state shouldn’t be pushed into the policies of the administration at the threat of losing state funding, when the Golden State accounts for an outsized portion of federal revenue.

“This is unconstitutional and vindictive,” Rivas said in a June 6 BlueSky post. “We’re the nation’s economic engine and the largest donor state, and deserve our fair share. I’ll use every legal and constitutional tool available to defend CA — we must look at every option, including withholding federal taxes.”

California residents and businesses contribute $83 billion more than the state receives in federal spending, according to the California Budget and Policy Center.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent fired back on social media, accusing the governor of promoting tax evasion. “Governor @GavinNewsom is threatening to commit criminal tax evasion,” Bessent posted on X. He added that the governor’s remarks were “extremely reckless.”

As of publication, the funding threats remain rhetorical, but they reflect the deepening divide between the federal administration and California’s leadership.

Trump admin weighs broader funding cuts

According to CNN, the Trump administration is preparing for a large-scale cancellation of California’s federal funding. Federal agencies have reportedly been directed to begin identifying grants that could be withheld, particularly those tied to the University of California and California State University systems.

Cole Lauterbach (Managing Editor) and Bast Bramhall (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , ,

Why this story matters

The confrontation between the Trump administration and California over federal education funding and Title IX policy highlights escalating tensions between state and federal authorities, with potential consequences for public funding, legal standards and governance.

Federal-state conflict

The dispute underscores the complex and often contentious relationship between federal and state governments regarding policy enforcement and funding authority.

Title IX and transgender athletes

The controversy centers around the interpretation of Title IX protections and rules for transgender participation in school sports, raising broader questions about gender, fairness and federal oversight.

Funding threats and economic leverage

Threats to withhold federal education funding from California and the governor's response about federal tax payments illustrate how financial tools are used as leverage in governmental disputes.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 17 media outlets

Community reaction

California officials and legislators have expressed concern and alarm over possible federal funding cuts. According to reporting, Assemblyman Al Muratsuchi warned that students with special needs and low-income backgrounds could be hardest hit. State Superintendent Tony Thurmond said California would continue to defend laws protecting student rights, and communities are bracing for both legal and practical impacts.

Context corner

Title IX is a federal civil rights law passed as part of the Education Amendments of 1972, prohibiting sex-based discrimination in educational programs receiving federal funding. Recent political debates have focused on whether its language covers gender identity, leading to conflicting federal and state interpretations and enforcement in policies for transgender student athletes.

History lesson

Federal threats to withhold funds from states or institutions due to policy disagreements are not unprecedented. In the 1960s, federal intervention occurred relating to civil rights enforcement in education. Past attempts often led to prolonged legal battles rather than immediate cuts, with courts clarifying constitutional and statutory limits on executive authority.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the Trump administration’s threat to cut California’s education funding as a politically motivated attack with dire consequences for vulnerable students, using emotionally charged terms like “targeted political vengeance” and emphasizing “fears” and being “at risk,” portraying California as a victim of harsh federal policies linked to broader clashes over immigration and social issues.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right , while de-emphasizing impacts on low-income students, employs skeptical language around “progress” with elite universities like Harvard and Columbia, highlighting legal compliance and Title IX enforcement as principled rather than punitive actions.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

17 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon stated that California is at risk of federal funding cuts due to non-compliance with Title IX policies, particularly regarding transgender athletes.
  • President Donald Trump has threatened to withhold funding from California if it allows transgender athletes to compete in women's sports.
  • California officials have called potential funding cuts "political vengeance" and warned of serious consequences for residents.
  • The ongoing conflict between the Trump administration and California could jeopardize $8 billion in annual federal education funding for public schools in the state.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • The Trump administration is contemplating reductions in federal aid to public universities in California.
  • This action follows concerns about universities' compliance with Title IX, especially regarding transgender women participating in women's sports, which Secretary McMahon labeled a clear violation.
  • These developments place California universities at risk of losing hundreds of millions in federal aid, signaling a shift toward stricter federal oversight tied to policy compliance and legal challenges ahead.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™