NIH bans grants to universities with DEI programs or Israeli boycotts


Summary

NIH funding ban

The NIH has imposed a ban on research grants for universities with Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) programs and those that support boycotts of Israeli goods or companies.

Harvard's lawsuit

Harvard University has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration's funding freeze and other actions, arguing the actions are illegal and detrimental to research and education.

Impact on research

Researchers warn that the funding freeze threatens medical advancements in critical areas such as tuberculosis and ALS research. Harvard alone may lose $488 million in NIH funding due to the freeze, which could also lead to layoffs.


Summary

NIH funding ban

The NIH has imposed a ban on research grants for universities with Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) programs and those that support boycotts of Israeli goods or companies.

Harvard's lawsuit

Harvard University has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration's funding freeze and other actions, arguing the actions are illegal and detrimental to research and education.

Impact on research

Researchers warn that the funding freeze threatens medical advancements in critical areas such as tuberculosis and ALS research. Harvard alone may lose $488 million in NIH funding due to the freeze, which could also lead to layoffs.


Full story

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced new rules banning medical research grants for universities with Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) programs or that have implemented boycotts of Israeli goods or companies. The new rules came in a policy notice on Monday, April 21.

What does the memo say?

The notice says that the NIH “reserves the right to terminate financial assistance and recover all funds” if universities receiving the grants do not adhere to federal policy banning DEI studies and “prohibited boycotts.” The guidelines are for “domestic recipients of new, renewal, supplement, or continuation awards,” according to the NIH memo.

Why is the Trump administration imposing restrictions?

The move is similar to a previous funding freeze imposed by the Trump administration on Harvard and Columbia over DEI initiatives and what the White House says was a lack of response to antisemitism on their campuses following pro-Palestinian protests last year.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Harvard filed a lawsuit on Monday challenging the Trump administration’s funding freeze and other illegal actions.

Harvard University President Alan M. Garber warned in a letter that the administration’s actions “have stark real-life consequences for patients, students, faculty, staff, researchers and the standing of American higher education in the world.”

How much money is at stake for Harvard?

The Harvard Crimson, a student-run publication, reports that of the institution’s $686 million in federal research funding, $488 million came from NIH in fiscal year 2024. The Harvard Crimson also noted that Harvard is likely to be the hardest hit by the funding freeze.

Have other actions been taken against Harvard?

As Straight Arrow News recently reported, the Trump administration also froze $2.2 billion in federal grants and contracts to Harvard, citing Harvard’s response to pro-Palestinian protests on campus last year.

Researchers warn the funding freeze threatens potentially life-saving research on diseases like tuberculosis and ALS and may lead to layoffs as key programs are slashed.

Harvard biology professor Benjamin L. de Bivort said in a statement to The Crimson on the latest funding freeze, “Private funding and the traditional model cannot come close to closing the gaps.” De Bivort warned some initiatives for young scientists may face further cuts as they are not eligible for private funding. 

What is the administration’s goal?

A Department of Health and Human Services official told CNN the agency’s goal is to cut off funding to research that doesn’t fit with the Trump administration’s NIH or HHS vision as well as to halt grants for potential recipients it alleges do not follow federal anti-discrimination laws.

Evan Hummel (Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

This story raises significant concerns regarding academic freedom, free speech and funding for critical medical research.

Academic freedom

The restrictions imposed by the NIH challenge the autonomy of universities and can be perceived as an attack on free speech and free inquiry, two pillars of academic freedom.

Key research impacted

The funding freeze could jeopardize crucial medical research projects, derailing advancements in health and medicine that rely heavily on federal grants.

Political influence

The situation highlights the increasing politicization of academic funding, raising questions about the role of government in shaping research priorities and university policies.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 38 media outlets

Context corner

This situation is rooted in broader historical tensions surrounding diversity and equity initiatives in academia, particularly in light of the political climate under the Trump administration. The NIH's recent policies reflect an evolving landscape where funding is increasingly contingent on compliance with specific political ideologies, marking a departure from inclusive research funding practices historically aimed at reducing health disparities.

Diverging views

The left-leaning articles largely criticize the NIH's decision to cut funding, viewing it as a politically motivated attack on diversity and inclusion programs. In contrast, right-leaning articles frame this as a necessary measure against discrimination, reinforcing norms against boycotting Israeli companies and defending federal funding priorities that align with conservative values.

Do the math

Colleges and universities could face dire consequences from the funding cuts, with Harvard predicting to lose a significant portion of its $488 million NIH funding in fiscal year 2024. Notably, Massachusetts Children's Hospital could see a loss of about 50% of its $230 million annual NIH funding, which is critical for ongoing treatments and clinical trials.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

38 total sources

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™