‘No lion is safe’: Blondie the lion lured from protected research area and killed


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

The controversy

A lion that was part of a research project was lured out of a protected area in Zimbabwe and killed by a hunter.

Criticism

The lion’s death has drawn criticism from animal rights advocates, who said that he should have never been targeted.

Defense

Defenders of the hunter have said that they did everything within the law and argue luring the lion out of a protected area is normal hunting practice.


Full story

A trophy hunter who killed a lion in Zimbabwe that was part of a study has drawn criticism from wildlife advocates. It mirrors another incident in which a research lion named Cecil was killed by an American hunter in the same country, outside of the same national park, a decade ago. That case also led to backlash.

Blondie the lion

The most recent lion killed, named Blondie, was part of an Oxford University research project and was equipped with a collar sponsored by Africa Geographic, a safari company.

The company announced that Blondie was killed by a hunter in June near Hwange National Park. Officials said the trophy hunter used bait to get Blondie to wander out of the protected area and into an area where hunting is permitted. 

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

A spokesperson for Zimbabwe’s National Parks told The Associated Press on Thursday that the hunter legally killed the lion and had obtained the necessary permits.

Zimbabwe law states that up to 100 lions can be hunted annually. In most cases, foreign hunters pay tens of thousands of dollars to hunt lions, often collecting the head or skin as a souvenir. 

Critics speak out against killing

Africa Geographic CEO Simon Espley condemned the killing. He said the death of Blondie makes “a mockery of ethics” that trophy hunters maintain they adhere to because the lion, described as a breeding male in the prime of his life, wore a highly visible research collar. Hunting enthusiasts say they solely kill older lions that are no longer breeding. 

“That Blondie’s prominent collar did not prevent him from being offered to a hunting client confirms the stark reality that no lion is safe from trophy hunting guns,” Espley said.

Lion hunts are a polarizing issue. Advocates for hunting argue it raises money for conservation efforts, while some critics want trophy hunting banned altogether. 

African countries differ in regulations. Kenya has outlawed commercial hunts, while in Zimbabwe and South Africa, they are legal. Botswana rescinded a previous ban on the practice six years ago.

Official defends hunter

Zimbabwe Parks Agency spokesperson, Tinashe Farawo, said that funds from hunts are integral to supporting wildlife conservation efforts in southern Africa, which are in dire need of money. He came to the hunter’s defense, arguing that hunts often happen under the cover of night, and Blondie’s collar may not have been seen by the big game hunter. 

He told the AP that he did not have knowledge of Blondie being lured out of his protected area by bait, but argued that there isn’t anything “unethical or illegal about that for anyone who knows how lions are hunted. This is how people hunt.”

Farawo added, “Our rangers were present. All the paperwork was in order. Collars are for research purposes, but they don’t make the animal immune to hunting.” 

Officials have declined to identify the hunter who killed Blondie. 

A decade after Cecil’s death

Following the death of Cecil the lion in 2015,  a lot of anger was directed toward the hunter who killed him, Walter Palmer, a Minnesota dentist and big game hunter who lured Cecil out of the very same national park in Zimbabwe. Cecil was also part of a study by Oxford University.

Alex Delia (Deputy Managing Editor), Jack Henry (Video Editor), and Drew Pittock (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The killing of a research lion in Zimbabwe raises ongoing debate over the ethics of trophy hunting, its impact on wildlife conservation and the tension between legal permissions and conservation priorities.

Trophy hunting ethics

The incident has reignited debate over the morality and ethical guidelines of trophy hunting, especially the targeting of collared research animals and adherence to established hunting ethics.

Conservation funding

Officials argue that funds generated from trophy hunting are crucial for supporting wildlife conservation, highlighting a delicate balance between raising resources for preservation and potential harm to protected species.

Legal and regulatory differences

The story illustrates contrasting national approaches to trophy hunting in Africa, emphasizing how laws and enforcement can affect both conservation practices and the fate of wildlife populations.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 42 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Reports indicate the trophy hunter paid between $35,000 and $46,000 to kill Blondie. Zimbabwe is home to about 1,500 wild lions, with Africa’s total wild lion population estimated at 20,000. Trophy hunting generates somewhere between $15 million and $20 million annually for Zimbabwe.

Debunking

Zimbabwe’s National Parks official confirmed the hunt was legal and appropriately permitted. However, critics claim hunting regulations regarding lion age were not upheld in this case.

Diverging views

Left-leaning articles emphasize the moral and ecological outrage, denouncing trophy hunting as unethical and calling for bans, while right-leaning sources focus more on legality, the financial aspects and present hunting as contentious but occasionally necessary for conservation funding.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

42 total sources

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.