North Korea refloats destroyer after failed launch, with possible Russian assistance


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Global embarrassment

Following a global embarrassment after a failed launch, a North Korean naval destroyer has been refloated and repairs are underway.

Timeline

Kim Jong Un has ordered the ship be ready for a meeting later this month. The pace at which North Korea is moving on repairs has surprised some U.S. military analysts.

Punishment

Kim Jong Un has vowed to punish those responsible for what he deemed criminal negligence that caused the ship to initially capsize. Four people have been detained over the incident.


Full story

North Korea said it has refloated a capsized 5,000-ton destroyer and towed it to the northeastern port of Chonglin for repairs, a key step in restoring what it called a major upgrade to Kim Jong Un’s naval arsenal. The development was reported by North Korean state media on Friday, June 6, and confirmed by satellite imagery reviewed by Reuters earlier this week.

Repairs underway

According to the official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA), technicians will inspect the hull before beginning full restoration work. The next phase – drying out the ship’s electronics and other seawater-damaged systems – is expected to take up to 10 days at a dry dock in the nearby port of Rajin, according to the Associated Press.

Satellite imagery taken by Planet Labs on Thursday, June 5, shows the warship upright and afloat near the same pier where the launch mishap occurred.

What we know about the ship

The high-tech destroyer is Pyongyang’s newest and most advanced warship. It’s part of a broader shift to modernize North Korea’s navy, whose fleet still includes Soviet-era ships in poor condition. The destroyer is believed to be the second of its class, following one unveiled in April. North Korea touted the vessel as its largest and most technologically sophisticated to date.

State media claims the ship is equipped with air and missile defense systems and can launch nuclear-capable ballistic and cruise missiles. During a previous missile test, Kim Jong Un personally observed as the ship conducted a live-fire drill. The destroyer is expected to enter active service by early 2026.

Moscow’s role and military impact

Western analysts believe the ship was built with the help of Moscow and warned that while Pyongyang’s naval technology remains inferior to those of Western powers, the new destroyers are still a potential threat that boosts North Korea’s military capabilities.

The launch failure on May 21 was reportedly caused by a new technique North Korea was testing, which caused the ship to slide off the slipway prematurely. The hull was smashed in the fall, though the bow remained stuck on the ramp. Just one day later, state media claimed the damage was not as severe as initially believed – a conclusion echoed by analysts who examined satellite images.

Fallout from the embarrassment

Kim Jong Un labeled the incident an act of “criminal negligence” and ordered punishment for those involved. He said the mishap harmed “the prestige of the state” and vowed consequences at a forthcoming ruling party meeting later this month. At least four officials have been detained.

Beating the clock

Kim has reportedly ordered repairs be completed in time for that party meeting – a timeline many experts were skeptical of. According to KCNA, the effort is on track and promises “the perfect restoration of the destroyer will be completed without fail.”

The speed of the operation has surprised military observers.

“Sheer manpower and – let’s face it – an innovative approach to righting the ship, delivered a solution in two weeks that people like me didn’t expect for four to six,” analyst Carl Schuster, a former U.S. Navy captain, told CNN.

How was the destroyer refloated?

CNN reports that North Korea was able to refloat the ship by attaching “aerostatic balloons” to the vessel’s hull to balance and subsequently get it upright again, as shown by satellite imagery.

Schuster added that if Pyongyang can coordinate the same resourcefulness to repairs, the destroyer may be ready for operations much sooner than expected.

“Nearly everything is doable if you are willing to commit the resources and have the human talent to employ it,” Schuster said.

Evan Hummel (Producer), Lawrence Banton (Digital Producer), Shianne DeLeon (Video Editor), and Matt Bishop (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , ,

Why this story matters

North Korea's rapid recovery and repair of a new destroyer following a major launch failure draws attention to the nation's ongoing military modernization efforts and its implications for regional security and international relations.

Military modernization

The restoration of the advanced destroyer is part of North Korea’s broader efforts to upgrade its largely outdated navy, as reported by state media and confirmed by independent satellite imagery.

International collaboration

Western analysts cited by Reuters believe that North Korea may have received assistance from Moscow in constructing the warship, highlighting potential alliances that could affect the regional balance of powers.

Leadership and accountability

Kim Jong Un's public response to the destroyer’s launch mishap — including orders for punishment and expedited repairs — shows the significance of military prestige and internal discipline in North Korea’s political system.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 82 media outlets

Global impact

The incident has international resonance, particularly regarding military cooperation between North Korea and Russia. Observers in Washington and Seoul express concern that assistance from Russia could enhance North Korea’s naval and nuclear capacities, with potential regional security implications for East Asia and possibly impacting international sanctions enforcement and technology transfers.

History lesson

Naval mishaps during launches are not new in military history, but North Korea rarely admits such failures publicly. In previous cases of military or civil failures, North Korean leadership has often responded with harsh disciplinary measures. The public acknowledgment and rapid response reflect both internal pressure and increased external scrutiny due to commercial satellite monitoring.

Underreported

One underreported aspect is the potential environmental and safety impact of the failed launch on the local Chongjin community. Most reporting centers on political, technical and military implications, but there is little information about possible pollution, hazards to local fishermen or disruptions to port activities arising from the capsized warship and its salvage operations.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left framed the capsized North Korean warship chiefly as a technical failure underscored by Kim Jong Un’s visible stress, emphasizing terms like “debacle” and “botched” that suggest incompetence but also highlight repair challenges and worker pressures.
  • Media outlets in the center agreed on the ship’s damaged state, the use of balloons in the salvage, and the significance of the incident to North Korea’s naval ambitions, revealing divergent priorities rooted in broader ideological and geopolitical views.
  • Media outlets on the right amplified the event as a dramatic humiliation for the regime, using emotionally charged language such as “disaster,” “criminal act,” and “farcical rescue mission,” while stressing harsh punishments and regime repression to underscore North Korea’s authoritarian brutality.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

82 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™