Nuclear impact: Scientists say NASA should blow up asteroid headed for moon


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Nuclear option

An asteroid with a 4% chance of hitting the moon has some researchers proposing that it be blown up using nuclear bombs.

Uncertainties

The research has yet to be peer reviewed, and it’s unknown whether officials would be willing to fund the mission.

Going nuclear

Researchers argue that the nuclear option is the best, given time constraints and the potential impact on astronauts in space.


Full story

Researchers, including some from NASA, say the best option to stop an asteroid with a 4% chance of smashing into the moon and a .00081% chance of slamming into Earth may be to nuke it. Earlier this year, the asteroid, dubbed 2024 YR4, made Straight Arrow News headlines as its odds of hitting Earth rose to the highest on record before plummeting to a tiny fraction of a percent. 

Still, astrophysicists are concerned that a potential collision with the moon might pose a danger to the astronauts aboard the International Space Station (ISS), who could be hit by debris in the aftermath.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Why DART wouldn’t do the trick

A study submitted for peer review to the Journal of the Astronautical Services found that the best available option to prevent an impact with the moon would be to blow up the asteroid.

That would be an entirely different approach than NASA’s 2022 Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART), which successfully changed the trajectory of an asteroid named Dimorphos by ramming an object into it at high speed. 

Scientists argue that there isn’t enough time to conduct a reconnaissance mission, which would need to be launched by late 2028, given the uncertainty about the asteroid’s weight and size.

Researchers estimate the asteroid’s weight could be as high as 2 billion pounds, leaving a DART mission out of the question. 

The nuclear option

The team further asserts that a so-called “kinetic disruption mission,” which would entail blowing up the asteroid into smaller pieces, would take up to seven years to develop. Instead, they argue that a “nuclear disruption” mission, with a launch window between late 2029 and late 2031, would be the most effective solution.

The plan involves deploying a pair of 100-kiloton nuclear bombs capable of traveling to the asteroid. Futurism.com reports that such bombs are five to eight times more powerful than the nuclear bombs that the U.S. dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima in 1945.

Uncertain future

Much remains uncertain about the response to the asteroid’s threat.

The Trump administration carried out major budget cuts at NASA earlier this year, and it is unclear whether the White House would want to dedicate money to the mission, given the asteroid’s minimal chance of impacting the moon and even smaller chance of hitting Earth in December 2032.

Tags: , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

Researchers are considering using nuclear devices to prevent a potentially hazardous asteroid from impacting the moon or Earth, highlighting the complexities of planetary defense and funding for space missions.

Planetary defense strategies

Scientists are exploring the use of nuclear devices as a potential response to asteroid threats, reflecting ongoing efforts to develop effective methods for planetary protection.

Mission feasibility and timing

Astrophysicists cite limited time and uncertainties about the asteroid's size and weight as challenges to using traditional methods like DART, influencing the choice of a nuclear disruption mission.

Funding and policy challenges

Budget decisions and political factors may affect NASA’s ability to conduct urgent asteroid mitigation missions, especially with recent funding cuts and uncertainty about future support.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.