Oklahoma halts Bible distribution plan in public schools


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Reversal

Oklahoma’s new Superintendent Lindel Fields will not continue the previous plan to distribute Bibles in public school classrooms.

Challenge

The decision follows a lawsuit challenging the mandate on religious liberty grounds.

Expansion

Meanwhile, Texas is moving forward with optional Bible-based lessons in schools.


Full story

Oklahoma’s new state superintendent says he will not move forward with his predecessor’s plan to distribute Bibles in public classrooms, according to reports. The decision comes after the Oklahoma Supreme Court gave Superintendent Lindel Fields until Oct. 28 to decide on the matter.

“We plan to file a motion to dismiss, and have no plans to distribute Bibles or a Biblical character education curriculum in classrooms,” Fields said in a statement, as reported by KOKH News. “If resources are left to be allocated, the timing is fortunate since the team and I are currently reviewing the budget.”

Former Oklahoma Superintendent Ryan Walters was pushing a policy to put Bibles in public school classrooms before he left the position earlier this month. He argued that the Bible should be included, not necessarily for religious reasons but because it influences history, literature and culture.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Lawsuit prompted by Bible mandate

In response to Walters’ plan, a group of people, including parents and faith leaders in Oklahoma, filed a lawsuit challenging the Bible-in-classrooms mandate, arguing that it would violate students’ religious liberty. The previous officials involved in the case, including former Superintendent Ryan Walters, have left office, meaning Fields is now legally responsible for decisions related to the case.

First Amendment freedoms

In Abington School District v. Schempp (1963), the Supreme Court ruled that public schools cannot sponsor Bible readings or prayer, as this violates the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause.

The state’s high court wanted to know, by Oct. 28, if Fields intended to continue fighting for the Bible mandate or drop it.

Tara Thompson, interim communications director for the state’s education department, said the agency will drop the mandate, end the lawsuit and plan to give schools new instructions on how to move forward.

Texas moves ahead with optional Bible curriculum

Oklahoma’s decision to step back from putting Bibles in classrooms comes as Texas moves forward with optional Bible-based lessons. Last year, the Texas Board of Education voted to allow schools to teach lessons based on the Bible. No school is required to use the Bible-based curriculum. The lessons are optional, and individual schools or districts can decide whether or not to use them.

Supporters of the Texas lessons said the Bible adds important historical and cultural context. In contrast, opponents said it could exclude students of other beliefs and violate constitutional law by mixing religion with public education.

Tags: , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

Oklahoma's decision to rescind a mandate requiring Bibles in public school classrooms highlights ongoing debates about religious freedom, state policy and the separation of church and state in public education.

Separation of church and state

The reversal of the Bible mandate addresses constitutional concerns and public debates about the proper boundary between religion and public education, a key issue raised in legal challenges and statements by civil rights groups.

State education policy

The shift in leadership and policy direction demonstrates how changes in state administration can directly affect educational mandates and guide the curriculum choices for schools across Oklahoma.

Legal and community response

Legal action and resistance from civil rights groups, parents, and school districts illustrate widespread scrutiny and the role of judicial oversight in shaping the implementation of controversial education policies.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 47 media outlets

Context corner

The controversy reflects longstanding debates in the United States about the separation of church and state, specifically the appropriateness of religious materials in public education as defined by constitutional law and local community standards.

Diverging views

Articles in the left category focus more on civil rights concerns and opposition to religious mandates, whereas right-leaning sources emphasize local control over curriculum and frame the rescinding as a matter of respecting district autonomy and resource allocation.

Underreported

The direct perspectives and reactions from students, teachers and school district leaders who would have implemented or opposed the Bible mandate are not widely covered in the articles.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

47 total sources

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.