Paramount, CBS scrap DEI initiatives after lawsuit settlement


Summary

Lawsuit challenged DEI

A former "SEAL Team" freelance writer sued CBS and Paramount, claiming diversity policies cost him a staff job.

Hiring changes

The two companies agreed to end policies like numerical diversity goals and DEI funding bonuses.

Industry impact warning

America First Legal said the outcome should serve as a warning to other entertainment companies using similar hiring practices.


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Lawsuit challenged DEI

A former "SEAL Team" freelance writer sued CBS and Paramount, claiming diversity policies cost him a staff job.

Hiring changes

The two companies agreed to end policies like numerical diversity goals and DEI funding bonuses.

Industry impact warning

America First Legal said the outcome should serve as a warning to other entertainment companies using similar hiring practices.


Full story

A lawsuit brought by a former CBS writer has led to changes at both CBS Studios and its parent company, Paramount Global. The case challenged how diversity initiatives were being applied behind the scenes, prompting updates to hiring practices.

Former “SEAL Team” freelancer Brian Beneker filed the lawsuit in February 2024, where he claimed he was denied a staff writer job because he is a heterosexual white man.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Allegations of discrimination

Beneker, who had written for “SEAL Team” since 2017, said he was passed over for staff positions multiple times. He alleged that those hired instead were non-white, LGBTQ+ or female, despite having fewer screenwriting credits and less experience.

In 2020, CBS announced a diversity pledge for its reality shows. The company said 50% of cast members for the 2021–22 season would be “Black, Indigenous, or People of Color (BIPOC).”

America First Legal, which represented Beneker, said a similar 50% quota was also set for writers’ rooms by the 2022–23 season. Beneker argued that the policy violated employment laws.

Paramount and CBS settlement terms

CBS attempted to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing its hiring decisions were protected under the First Amendment. However, the judge denied the motion, stating that the issues should be addressed through a motion for summary judgment.

Fast forward to April 2025 and the two sides have reached a settlement.

As part of the agreement, Paramount and CBS agreed to end certain DEI practices. According to America First Legal, the companies agreed to:

  • End numerical goals related to race, ethnicity, sex or gender.
  • Stop collecting demographic data on applicants.
  • Remove a 5% funding bonus for programs advancing DEI goals.

Paramount had already notified employees in February 2025 that it was winding down its DEI policies, according to a memo obtained by CNBC.

Nick Barry, senior counsel for America First Legal, praised the outcome.

“America First Legal is pleased to see Paramount and CBS publicly back off their DEI requirements and return to merit-based considerations,” Barry said. “Diversity quotas that discriminate on the basis of race are unlawful. Others in the entertainment industry should take note.”

The full terms of the settlement were not disclosed. However, America First Legal confirmed that Beneker voluntarily dismissed his claims following the amicable resolution.

Neither CBS nor Paramount has publicly addressed the settlement.

Tags: , , ,

Why this story matters

The outcome of the lawsuit filed by Brian Beneker against CBS highlights ongoing tensions regarding diversity initiatives in the entertainment industry and raises questions about meritocracy in hiring practices.

Diversity policies

The case sparks a broader examination of how diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies are implemented, potentially influencing hiring practices across the entertainment sector.

Legal implications

The legal resolution underscores the contentious intersections of federal civil rights laws and corporate diversity initiatives, setting precedents for future litigation in similar cases.

Industry impact

The resolution may prompt other media companies to reassess their DEI practices, either in response to legal scrutiny or public pressure, influencing the overall landscape of the entertainment industry.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 13 media outlets

Context corner

Historically, diversity quotas have aimed to rectify systemic imbalances in various industries, including entertainment. The recent settlement reflects a larger movement against such initiatives as perceived government influence on corporate policies, paralleling past debates on affirmative action and diversity in hiring, revealing ongoing tensions between meritocratic ideals and representation.

Diverging views

The left-leaning articles typically argue that the rollback of DEI initiatives jeopardizes representation and the progress achieved in the industry. In contrast, right-leaning articles celebrate the settlement as a victory against perceived discrimination against white male workers, positioning it as a necessary return to meritocracy over diversity quotas, thus reflecting fundamentally opposing views on the issue.

Policy impact

The rollback of DEI initiatives may lead to a less diverse workforce in creative fields, potentially impacting the quality and representation of stories produced in mainstream media. This shift could discourage marginalized voices in storytelling, reversing decades of progress aimed at inclusivity in Hollywood.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left de-emphasized the broader impact on Hollywood, focusing instead on the legal arguments, the timeline, and the settlement's limited impact on existing DEI policies, characterizing CBS's diversity goals as potentially amounting to an "illegal quota."
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right highlighted Bill Owens' resignation from "60 Minutes," connecting it to pressure from the Trump administration.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

14 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • CBS has settled a lawsuit with Brian Beneker, who claimed discrimination based on illegal diversity quotas that favored certain groups.
  • The settlement terms remain undisclosed, and it follows a trend where companies like Paramount have rolled back their diversity policies due to government pressure.
  • Beneker alleged that CBS's diversity goals created illegal quotas affecting hiring practices, which were labeled as discriminatory by America First Legal, the group representing him.
  • The lawsuit survived a dismissal by the court, allowing for a settlement after mediation, but questions about diversity policies remain unresolved.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

  • No coverage from Center sources 0 sources

Key points from the Right

  • CBS and Paramount Global settled a lawsuit with Brian Beneker, who alleged racial discrimination related to promotion denials based on his demographic background and corporate inclusion policies.
  • The settlement comes after Beneker worked on "SEAL Team" since 2017 but was repeatedly overlooked for promotion due to CBS's diversity policies.
  • AFL Senior Counsel Nick Barry expressed approval of CBS's decision to back off DEI initiatives, emphasizing a return to merit-based hiring.
  • The case signals potential for future legal challenges regarding unfair treatment based on hiring practices in the entertainment industry.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™