Pentagon now says it will take Iran up to 2 years to restore nuclear capabilities


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Pentagon assessment

After nearly two weeks of various assessments, the Pentagon now says the air strikes on Iran’s nuclear program set it back by up to two years.

Previous conflicting reports

The analysis was released Wednesday after President Trump had previously assessed the nuclear program as “obliterated.”

Questions on severity

There had been questions as to just how severe the damage was, with various national and international experts weighing-in, in the days that followed.


Full story

In the nearly two weeks since the U.S. attacked three Iranian nuclear facilities, several reports revealed conflicting information on the devastation. Now, the Pentagon has released its official damage assessment of the attacks.

What does the Pentagon report say?

Pentagon intelligence experts said Wednesday, July 2, that the strikes set back Iran’s nuclear program by up to two years. The assessment is notably more measured than President Donald Trump’s earlier claim that the attack “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell says the strikes “degraded” Iran’s nuclear program at key sites including Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. However, when reporters pressed Parnell about the intelligence assessment, he maintained the administration’s position had not changed and that the sites were “completely obliterated.”

“It’s delayed by one to two years. I think we’re probably closer to two years,” he said. “It’s not just enriched uranium or centrifuges or things like that. We destroyed the components that they would need to build a bomb.” 

How quickly could Iran rebuild?

The question now is how fast Iran might be able to rebuild those facilities and resume uranium enrichment — the core process for developing a nuclear weapon.

The Fordo facility sits buried deep within a mountain, which makes it especially difficult to strike. Natanz remains Iran’s largest enrichment site. Some analysts have raised the possibility that Iran may have preemptively moved material or stored critical components elsewhere.

What are other experts saying?

A senior official with the International Atomic Energy Agency said the U.S. inflicted “a very serious level of damage,” though some essential infrastructure may still be intact. According to the IAEA, Iran could potentially restart centrifuge operations and begin producing enriched uranium “in a matter of months.”

The Wall Street Journal reports that United Nations officials are urging international inspectors to verify the current state of Iran’s nuclear program. Meanwhile, ABC News reports Republican lawmakers have voiced satisfaction with the administration’s handling of the strikes, while Democrats remain skeptical. 

CIA Director John Radcliffe stated that credible intelligence confirms U.S. airstrikes “severely damaged” Iran’s nuclear program.

Jason Morrell (Morning Managing Editor), Shianne DeLeon (Video Editor), and Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

The United States' recent airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites have resulted in reported delays to Iran's nuclear program, raising global questions about nuclear proliferation and the potential for regional instability.

U.S. military action

American airstrikes targeting key Iranian nuclear facilities represent a significant development in the ongoing tensions between the United States and Iran.

Iran's nuclear program

The extent of damage to Iran's nuclear infrastructure and the potential for rebuilding influence the broader debate around nuclear capabilities and international security.

International response and verification

Calls from the IAEA and the United Nations for verification, alongside differing domestic political reactions, highlight the importance of independent assessment and global oversight in nuclear nonproliferation efforts.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 94 media outlets

Global impact

The strikes have heightened international tension and uncertainty, particularly in the Middle East. They have affected diplomatic efforts, as Iran suspended cooperation with the IAEA, complicating external verification. Allies of the US reportedly approve of the action, believing it contributes to stability, while international watchdogs emphasize the risks of escalation and lack of transparency.

History lesson

Previous attempts to set back Iran’s nuclear program through sabotage and cyberattacks have met with partial, often temporary, success. Military strikes represent a more direct approach than diplomatic negotiations or sanctions, but history shows such actions can lead to retaliatory escalation and do not necessarily halt underlying technical knowledge or ambition.

Oppo research

Skeptics, including some Democrats and international organizations, raise concerns over the effectiveness and transparency of the strikes. The International Atomic Energy Agency and European officials express doubts about the proclaimed extent of the damage and worry about the cessation of inspections, warning that Iran’s program may recover more rapidly than claimed.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left cast Trump’s claims of having “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear program as exaggerated, spotlighting intelligence leaks and the Defense Intelligence Agency’s “low-confidence” assessment to fuel skepticism and question the administration’s credibility, thus employing wary and critical rhetoric.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right embrace strong, affirmative language like “reveals” and “closer to 2 years,” framing the strikes as a decisive military success and confidently affirming Trump’s narrative, often dismissing nuanced intelligence doubts as irrelevant.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

94 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The Pentagon stated that U.S. strikes have set back Iran's nuclear program by up to two years, according to Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell.
  • Parnell confirmed the destruction of key sites at Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan, emphasizing that intelligence reports support this assessment.
  • Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi acknowledged severe damage from the strikes, saying, "the facilities have been seriously and heavily damaged."
  • Sean Parnell reported that intelligence suggests the air and missile strikes "obliterated" three key nuclear facilities, weakening Iran’s ability to construct a bomb.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • In June, the U.S. military launched Operation Midnight Hammer, using B-2 bombers to strike Iran's nuclear sites at Natanz, Fordo, and Isfahan.
  • This attack aimed to degrade Iran's nuclear program, which Pentagon officials and allies assess was set back by one to two years, although a low-confidence report suggested only months.
  • Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell stated the targeted facilities have been completely obliterated, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the bombs hit precisely as planned.
  • International Atomic Energy Agency head Rafael Grossi said the damage was severe but not total and Iran could resume uranium enrichment in months; Trump disputed the report, attacking media coverage sharply.
  • The strikes' setback to Iran's nuclear ambitions may enhance regional stability, but Iran retains capabilities to rebuild, and intelligence assessments vary on the program's exact status.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The Pentagon stated that U.S. airstrikes have set back Iran's nuclear program by one to two years, according to spokesperson Sean Parnell.
  • Defense officials, including President Donald Trump, argued that the strikes had a devastating impact on Iran's nuclear ambitions.
  • Iran retaliated with a symbolic attack on the U.S.'s Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar after the airstrikes.
  • Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, warned that Iran could restart uranium enrichment in months, despite reported damage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

Timeline