Postal Service finalizes mail ballot rule as courts block enforcement


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Full story

The U.S. Postal Service has finalized new rules for handling mail ballots in federal elections, but said it will not enforce them for this year’s midterms unless courts lift injunctions blocking President Donald Trump’s mail-voting executive order.

The final rule, effective Aug. 21 and scheduled for publication in the Federal Register on Aug. 26, amends the Domestic Mail Manual for mail-in and absentee ballots used in federal elections. The Postal Service said the rule is intended to improve visibility of ballot mail, create state-specific participation lists and aid enforcement of federal law.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the Straight Arrow app today to get the stories that matter free from manipulation, bias or agenda.™

Point phone camera here

Under the rule, election officials or authorized mail vendors would have to use envelopes with the official Election Mail logo. States also would have to submit voter names, addresses and barcode information through a new Federal Ballot Mail Portal before outbound federal ballot mailings are accepted.

Postal employees would verify outbound federal ballot mailings before accepting them, using information submitted to the portal. Ballot mailings that do not comply would be returned to the authorized ballot mailer for correction. The rule does not apply the same verification process to ballots voters return to election offices.

Executive order blocked by courts

The rule grew out of Trump’s March 31 executive order, which directed federal agencies to take steps the administration said would strengthen election integrity. The order called for state-by-state citizenship lists and directed the Postal Service to develop rules governing mail ballots in federal elections.

The policy has been blocked in litigation brought by 23 states and the District of Columbia. U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Massachusetts ruled June 25 that core provisions of the order exceeded presidential authority and violated the separation of powers. She barred federal agencies, including the Postal Service, from implementing those provisions for the Nov. 3 election and any earlier federal elections in the plaintiff states.

Talwani later issued a separate injunction in a case brought by the League of Women Voters of Massachusetts and other voting-rights groups, blocking the Postal Service from implementing the mail-ballot portion of the order for this year’s elections. The Postal Service acknowledged those injunctions in the final rule and said it will not take action to implement the rule for the 2026 election unless the government obtains relief.

The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to allow the order to take effect while the litigation continues. The administration argues the lower court orders prevent agencies from carrying out policy work and could run out the clock before the midterms. The states challenging the order say the Constitution gives states and Congress authority over federal election administration.

The agency said it will not inspect ballot contents, determine voter eligibility, maintain voter rolls or count ballots. It said information in the portal would come from election officials and would be used to create state-specific mail-in and absentee participation lists that could help election officials and law enforcement identify potential anomalies.

The final rule excludes primary elections and ballots covered by the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act. It also says states remain responsible for voter eligibility and election administration.

In a statement, Michael McNulty, senior policy director for Issue One, a bipartisan political reform organization, acknowledged the rule is currently blocked, but called it “an attempt to weaponize USPS as part of the Trump administration’s efforts to take over elections.”

“If it holds up in court, it would mean postal workers shift from neutral transporters of a state-led process to a federal gatekeeper of states’ outbound mail ballots — requiring states to provide USPS with voter-level ballot information and giving USPS authority to reject ballots that do not meet the new federal requirements,” McNulty said.

Round out your reading

Tags: , , ,

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

New federal rules governing how mail ballots are processed exist on paper but are currently blocked by courts from taking effect in 2026 federal elections, leaving the practical impact on voters uncertain.

Rules blocked for now

Two federal injunctions bar the Postal Service from enforcing the new mail-ballot rules for 2026 elections, meaning current mail-voting procedures remain unchanged for now.

Supreme Court could change this

The Trump administration has asked the Supreme Court to lift the injunctions, which, if granted, could activate the new requirements before the midterms.

New submission rules exist

Under the finalized rule, election officials would be required to register ballot mailing data through a new federal portal before outbound ballots are accepted by postal workers.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 39 media outlets

Context corner

Under the U.S. Constitution, states hold primary authority over election administration. Mail-in voting expanded during the 2020 election cycle amid the COVID-19 pandemic and has remained elevated, with roughly a third of all recent federal votes cast by mail.

Diverging views

Outlets on the left frame the rule as an unconstitutional federal overreach that threatens voter access and could suppress turnout. Outlets on the right tend to present the rule as a straightforward election integrity measure aligned with President Donald Trump's executive order, with less emphasis on disenfranchisement concerns.

Policy impact

If implemented, the rule would require states to submit voter names, addresses and unique barcodes to USPS before ballots could enter the mail system. States that do not comply would have their ballots rejected, potentially affecting military members, seniors and voters who move close to Election Day.

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the USPS rule as “tighter” measures that could “block” ballots, stressing apparent conflict with injunctions and the government’s claim it “cannot enforce” them.
  • Media outlets in the center bridge these narratives, portraying mail voting as “restricted” while detailing the practical possibility of refusing noncompliant ballots.
  • Media outlets on the right foreground voter-list requirements and preparation for implementation, while “despite court stoppage” and “hurdles,” suggesting administrative overreach yet emphasizing procedural safeguards.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

39 total sources

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™