Ms. Rachel’s Gaza posts sparked calls for an investigation into foreign propaganda, raising questions about influencers and global issues.

Nathan Congleton/NBC via Getty Images

Kennedy Felton Lifestyle Correspondent/Producer

Lifestyle

Pro-Israel group calls on AG to investigate Ms. Rachel for Gaza posts

Apr 9

Listen

Kennedy Felton Lifestyle Correspondent/Producer

By Kennedy Felton (Lifestyle Correspondent/Producer), Harry Fogle (Video Editor)

YouTube star Ms. Rachel is facing calls for a federal investigation after posting about children killed in Gaza. A pro-Israel group claims her content may amount to paid foreign propaganda, though there is no evidence that Ms. Rachel has been paid by any person or entity.
The controversy has reignited debates around influencers posting about global conflicts and potential ties to foreign interests.
Ms. Rachel has previously stated that her interest in advocacy work began when she saw a video of a Palestinian child who survived an airstrike in Gaza.

Full Story

YouTube star Ms. Rachel is facing scrutiny over her recent Gaza posts. A pro-Israel group is calling for a federal investigation into whether her content amounts to paid foreign propaganda, though there is no evidence that Ms. Rachel has been paid by any person or entity.

Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News™

The group, StopAntisemitism, sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi asking for an inquiry into Ms. Rachel’s recent social media activity according to the New York Post. They argue her videos may have violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), a law requiring individuals paid by foreign governments to disclose that relationship.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Although there is no public evidence that Ms. Rachel — whose full name is Rachel Griffin Accurso — received any payment, the request for an inquiry has ignited a broader conversation. Questions are mounting about influencers, foreign interests, and how platforms like TikTok and Instagram are being used to shape public opinion around the war in Gaza.

Posts that prompted calls to investigate

Ms. Rachel, best known for her educational YouTube series for toddlers, posted a video on TikTok in December 2024 talking about the number of child deaths in Gaza since the war broke out. That video alone received more than 14,000 comments, with many users praising her for speaking out. A few others questioned the post, asking why she didn’t also highlight Israeli victims.

She also collaborated on a March 2025 video with a friend she says lost his home in Gaza. In another recent post with World Food Programme USA, Ms. Rachel spotlighted food insecurity in four regions, including Gaza.

The advocacy group StopAntisemitism took issue with these posts. In their letter, they wrote: “Given the vast sums of foreign funds that have been directed toward propagandizing our young people on college campuses, we suspect there is a similar dynamic in the online influencer space.”

While Ms. Rachel hasn’t spoken publicly about the recent allegations, she has said in previous interviews that her interest in advocacy began when she saw a video of a child who had survived an airstrike in Gaza. Speaking to The Independent, Ms. Rachel said, “The look in his eyes has stayed in my mind. No child should experience that kind of fear, shock and terror.”

Similarly, while promoting a fundraiser on Instagram in May 2024, Ms. Rachel said she “care[s] deeply for all children,” adding, “Palestinian children, Israeli children, children in the US – Muslim, Jewish, Christian children – all children, in every country. Not one is excluded.”

Claims of misinformation

StopAntisemitism also accused Ms. Rachel of spreading misinformation. One example they cited was her sharing of an image showing a severely malnourished child with protruding limbs. Without providing any evidence, the group claimed the child had cystic fibrosis, and was not suffering from starvation.

The Washington Post, meanwhile, quoted the boy’s mother as saying he suffers from both starvation and cystic fibrosis.

A larger pattern of influencer involvement

Ms. Rachel is far from the only influencer caught in the crosshairs of this issue. The Jerusalem Post reported in 2023 that around five dozen individuals claiming to be independent journalists were participating in what the outlet called a propaganda campaign against Israel. Together, they reached over 100 million social media followers.

One prominent example was Plestia Alaqad, a journalist with more than 4 million followers. She posted a video about an October 2023 bombing at Gaza’s Al-Ahli Hospital, claiming it killed more than 1,000 people. The Jerusalem Post cited international investigations estimating fewer than 50 deaths.

However, The Associated Press reported conflicting numbers. Gaza’s health ministry originally claimed 500 people were killed, later revising the toll to 471. U.S. intelligence estimates range from 100 to 300 casualties. Responsibility for the blast remains disputed.

Coordinated campaigns on both sides

The controversy around Ms. Rachel’s Gaza posts is unfolding amid broader revelations of online influence campaigns. In May 2024, The New York Times reported that Meta and OpenAI had disrupted a covert operation originating in Israel. That campaign used AI-generated content and hundreds of fake accounts posing as Americans to push pro-Israel messaging toward U.S. lawmakers.

The report said Israel’s Ministry of Diaspora Affairs had earmarked $2 million for the campaign. However, the ministry denied any involvement.

Controversy around StopAntisemitism

StopAntisemitism argues that Ms. Rachel’s Gaza posts may violate federal law if she was compensated in any way by foreign groups.

The group has garnered controversy in the past with its ‘Antisemite of the Week’ posts. Climate activist Greta Thunberg and rapper Macklemore have booth been featured.

However, while they acknowledge Ms. Rachel is entitled to her personal opinions, they maintain that transparency is key — especially when someone with her reach speaks on international issues.

Tags: attorney general, Gaza, Hamas, Investigation, Israel, Palestine, Social Media, YouTube

[KENNEDY FELTON]

She’s known for teaching millions of toddlers their ABCs, but now Ms. Rachel is at the center of a political storm.

An advocacy group is calling on the Justice Department to investigate whether her recent posts about Gaza could amount to paid propaganda. While there’s no public evidence she received any money, the push to investigate is sparking a much bigger conversation about influencers, human rights, and whether some social media voices are being compensated to share content on behalf of foreign interests.

“Over 14,000 precious children have been unalived in Gaza,” Ms. Rachel, whose full name is Rachel Griffin Accurso, said in one of the posts in question. She has posted several political videos on TikTok and Instagram to her millions of followers.

This TikTok alone has over 14,000 comments, many thanking her for using her platform to raise awareness. Others questioned the post, asking, “What about Israeli children?”

In a more recent post from March, she collaborated with a friend who she says lost his home in Gaza. In another collaboration post, this time with World Food Programme USA, she highlighted food crises in four regions, including Gaza.

The New York Post first reported that Jewish advocacy group StopAntisemitism sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, objecting to some of Ms. Rachel’s content. Part of it reads, “Given the vast sums of foreign funds that have been directed toward propagandizing our young people on college campuses, we suspect there is a similar dynamic in the online influencer space.”

The group also claims she amplified “misinformation from Hamas and other anti-Israel sources,” pointing to an image she shared of a severely malnourished child with protruding ribs. StopAntisemitism alleges the child has cystic fibrosis, not starvation. However, according to The Washington Post, the child’s mother says he suffers from both starvation and cystic fibrosis.

Ms. Rachel is one of the most popular children’s YouTubers, known for educational songs that help toddlers develop language skills. But she’s now part of a growing debate—accusations that influencers across the globe are being encouraged or paid to post content that supports one side of the war.

In 2023, The Jerusalem Post reported on five dozen individuals claiming to be independent journalists who collectively reached over 100 million social media followers. The outlet described it as part of a coordinated “propaganda campaign against Israel.”

For example, one journalist with four million followers posted a video in October 2023 claiming more than 1,000 people were killed in the bombing of Gaza’s Al-Ahli Hospital. The Jerusalem Post cited international independent investigations that estimated fewer than 50 deaths. However, AP News reported varying figures. Gaza’s health ministry initially said 500 Palestinians were killed, later revising the number to 471. American intelligence estimated 100 to 300 deaths.

Last May, according to The New York Times, Meta and OpenAI said they disrupted a covert campaign originating in Israel. The effort reportedly used AI-generated content and fake American accounts to influence U.S. lawmakers with pro-Israel messaging. Israel’s Ministry of Diaspora Affairs was reported to have designated $2 million for the effort, though they have denied any involvement.

As for Ms. Rachel, StopAntisemitism argues her posts may violate the Foreign Agents Registration Act. The group clarifies she’s entitled to her opinions, but if anyone is being paid by a foreign government or group to influence American audiences, they’re legally required to disclose that.

Bias Summary

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this comparison

Bias Comparison

Media outlets on the left framed a pro-Israel group’s call to investigate Ms. Rachel for alleged Hamas propaganda as an aggressive “attack,” highlighting her support for Gaza and emphasizing the suffering of Palestinian children, referencing the ICJ’s finding of a plausible risk of genocide.

Media outlets on the right amplified the “Hamas propaganda” accusation, alleging Ms. Rachel ignored Israeli victims and spread “misinformation,” portraying her as unsympathetic to Jewish children.

Report an issue with this comparison