Rare loss for federal prosecutors trying to charge DC sandwich thrower


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Grand jury indictments

Federal prosecutors from the Department of Justice did not secure an indictment from a grand jury against Sean Dunn for throwing a sandwich at a Customs and Border Protection officer.

Potential influence of public opinion

The Customs and Border Protection officer targeted was part of a deployment by President Donald Trump to address crime in Washington, D.C.—a move reportedly unpopular among D.C. residents who serve on grand juries.

Legal implications

Prosecutors can present cases to grand juries repeatedly if indictments are not returned, as the constitutional ban on double jeopardy does not apply before a trial.


Full story

Federal prosecutors from the Department of Justice failed to get an indictment from a grand jury against Sean Dunn, the man who threw a Subway sandwich at a Customs and Border Protection officer. It marks the second time this week a Washington, D.C., grand jury rejected an indictment from the U.S. Attorney’s office.

Grand jury indictments

Federal prosecutors wanted to bring felony assault charges against Dunn and needed a grand jury to approve of that. A grand jury is made up of up to 23 citizens, of which 12 need to vote in favor of the indictment.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

How often are prosecutors able to get those indictments?

“Almost always,” Andrew Leipold, professor at the Univ. of Illinois School of Law, told Straight Arrow News. “Prosecutors routinely get indictments when they want them.”

Leipold added it’s “pretty rare” for grand juries to reject indictments, known as no true bill.

“It doesn’t happen very often, in part because prosecutors are repeat players,” Leipold said. “They go in front of grand juries all the time. They know what they need to present to get an indictment, and if they don’t think they have it, then they just won’t bring the case to the grand jury in the first place.”

Recent data on grand jury rejections is hard to find but data from 2010 shows of the 193,000 cases pursued by U.S. attorneys, only 11 of them, or 0.006%, ended because a grand jury did not return an indictment.

“It’s very rare for a prosecutor of any kind in front of a grand jury to fail to obtain an indictment,” Heather J. Mattes, a Pennsylvania criminal defense attorney, told Straight Arrow News. “Because first of all, the prosecutors control the information that goes before the grand jury.”

Unlike a trial jury, a grand jury only hears from the prosecution. They also only need “probable cause” to indict, whereas a trial jury needs “beyond a reasonable doubt” to convict.

What happened in Sean Dunn’s case?

“I like to think that what happened here was that the grand jurors saw the evidence and they said, ‘this doesn’t deserve a grand jury indictment,’ that you haven’t proven your case,” Mattes said. “You have to show that somebody is doing something that rises to the level of a federal felon. And I can’t tell you what was in the minds of the jurors, but it certainly is encouraging to think that these prosecutions were turned back by fellow Americans who saw who judged the quality of these prosecutions for themselves.”

Video showed Dunn throwing the sandwich at the officer so what happened is not likely what motivated jurors to make that decision. Grand juries are also secretive, and jurors do not need to explain their decision.

“Jurors may have thought, our responsibility is not just to decide whether the prosecutor could prove its case, but to decide whether charges should be brought in the first instance,” Leipold said.

The 37-year-old Dunn threw the sandwich at the agent who was deployed by President Donald Trump to curb crime in the city. Crime has gone down since the deployment but the move has been unpopular with D.C. residents who make up the grand juries.

“It was an act of resistance by a panel of citizens who often would follow the lead of the local prosecutor,” Jeffrey Fagan, law professor at Columbia University, told Straight Arrow News. “But this is a federal case, and the rejection of the charges by a federal prosecutor is a rejection of the federal enforcement program. Given polling showing consistent public disapproval of the policy, it’s not a surprise that the grand jury would nullify the attempt to impose a criminal charge, or any charge.”

What happened in Sidney Reid’s case?

The rejection in the Dunn case comes just two days after another Washington, D.C., grand jury declined a third time to indict Sidney Reid. Reid stands accused of assaulting an FBI agent during an inmate swap with ICE.

If grand juries fail to return an indictment, prosecutors can keep trying as long as they want.

Double jeopardy prevents someone from being tried twice for the same crime. However, if a grand jury refuses to indict, that person hasn’t been put in jeopardy at all.

“There’s no legal bar to that,” Leipold said. “Whether it’s a good idea or not…reasonable people might debate that one.”

Following their third failure to secure an indictment, U.S. Attorney for D.C. and former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro’s office filed misdemeanor charges against Reid.

“The system worked,” Mattes said.

Cost to taxpayers

Grand juries aren’t free.

“You have to pay the court stenographer,” Mattes said. “You have to pay the supervising judge who is in charge of the grand jury. You have to pay the prosecutors. You have to pay the guards and the agents and the people who are coming as witnesses. You’re using federal funds to pursue these people in this manner.”

It’s unclear if prosecutors plan to charge Dunn with a misdemeanor or try another grand jury.

“It depends on whether the Department of Justice decides they want to impanel a couple more grand juries for a guy who threw a sandwich at somebody,” Mattes said.

Tags: , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A federal grand jury's rare refusal to indict Sean Dunn after he threw a sandwich at a Customs and Border Protection officer raises questions about prosecutorial discretion, public sentiment, and the use of federal legal resources.

Grand jury process

Grand juries almost always return indictments when prosecutors seek them, making this rejection an uncommon outcome that prompts scrutiny of both procedure and standards for bringing federal charges.

Public sentiment and legal outcomes

The response of grand jurors, who represent local citizens, may reflect growing dissatisfaction with certain federal policies and enforcement actions, highlighting the role of community perspectives in the legal system.

Resource allocation in prosecution

Bringing cases before grand juries and repeated attempts at indictment have financial costs for taxpayers, leading to questions about the efficient use of federal legal and judicial resources.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the grand jury’s refusal to indict Sean Dunn as a political victory against what they depict as Trump’s “militarized occupation” and “dictatorial federal takeover” of D.C., casting Dunn as a “folk hero” and emphasizing the chilling effect on LGBTQ+ communities.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right highlight the grand jury’s decision as a manifestation of “jury nullification” and a “sharp rebuke” to federal overreach, using terms like “political theater” and dismissing federal prosecution as excessive.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

107 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Federal prosecutors could not secure a felony indictment against Sean Dunn for allegedly throwing a sandwich at a Customs and Border Protection officer, despite video evidence and Dunn's confession, as reported by CBS News.
  • Sean Dunn, a former DOJ employee, was fired following the incident where he called law enforcement agents "f—— fascists" before throwing the sandwich, according to an affidavit from the Justice Department.
  • A federal grand jury declined to indict Dunn, despite video evidence and a confession, signaling skepticism towards the prosecution's case, as highlighted by the New York Times.
  • Public opinion in D.C. shows that many residents oppose the increased federal presence, with a recent poll indicating that 80% oppose Trump's policing surge, according to a Washington Post-Schar School poll.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On August 27, 2025, a D.C. grand jury declined to indict Sean Charles Dunn, a former Justice Department employee, for allegedly throwing a sandwich at a federal officer, multiple outlets reported.
  • On Aug. 10, the confrontation unfolded when Sean Charles Dunn threw a sandwich at 14th and U Streets NW, and the video went viral, leading to his firing from the Justice Department shortly after.
  • Affidavits and video evidence showed Sean Charles Dunn threw a sub-style sandwich at agent Gregory Lairmore and called officers 'fascists'; Pirro spokesman Timothy Lauer said, `In line with President Trump's directive to make DC safe, U.S. Attorney Pirro has made it clear that the old way of doing things is unacceptable.`
  • The U.S. Attorney's Office could try again to indict Sean Charles Dunn, though prosecutors may downgrade charges to a misdemeanor; Dunn was fired by the DOJ after his arrest.
  • Legal analysts note the decision joins other grand jury rejections in D.C., reflecting juror resistance to the Trump administration's federal law-enforcement surge in Washington, D.C., which has led to more than 1,000 arrests.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A federal grand jury refused to indict Sean Dunn for throwing a Subway sandwich at a federal law enforcement officer, according to The New York Times.
  • Dunn gained notoriety for his actions against the Trump administration's presence in D.C., leading to his arrest by 20 officers in riot gear.
  • The grand jury's decision highlights the unpopularity of federal actions in D.C., suggesting a possibility of jury nullification.
  • The Times described the grand jury's refusal to indict as a 'remarkable failure' and a 'sharp rebuke' to the U.S. Attorney's Office.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.