Recordings reveal captain shut off fuel switches before Air India crash: Report


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

New details

Newly-reported findings from the Air India crash investigation reveal switches that control fuel to the engines were shut off briefly by the senior captain.

Investigation

Investigators stress the findings are preliminary and do not yet know if the act was deliberate or accidental while acknowledging they are still looking into other potential factors.

Expert analysis

However, some experts suggest the new findings reveal a deliberate act to shut off the fuel switches.


Full story

More details are emerging from the investigation into June’s deadly Air India crash. A black-box recording of the flight’s two pilots reveals the captain turned off switches that controlled the fuel flowing to the aircraft’s two engines, as first reported by The Wall Street Journal on Wednesday, July 16.

The new findings

Sources familiar with the U.S. officials’ early assessment of the evidence told the Journal that the first officer flying the Boeing 787 Dreamliner questioned the senior captain about why he had switched off the fuel flow as the plane took off and climbed. The first officer reportedly expressed shock and then alarm as the captain “seemed to remain calm.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

A preliminary finding from the investigation, released during the week of July 6, summarized the recording but didn’t clearly identify which pilot was speaking during the exchange. The report from India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau noted that one pilot asked the other why he’d moved the switches to the “cutoff” position, while the other pilot denied having done so.

Revelations in that report also strongly suggest it was the captain who turned off the fuel switches, according to sources familiar with the matter. The report, however, stopped short of concluding whether it was intentional or accidental.

Why it matters

The new findings may lead to a better understanding of how the tragic events of the June 12 crash unfolded.

The captain, identified as Sumeet Sabharwal, had decades of experience, while the copilot, identified as Clive Kunder, was relatively early in his career.

According to the Journal, Kunder would have most likely “had his hands full pulling back on the Dreamliner’s controls” during takeoff, while Sabharwal, the one in charge of overseeing operations, “would have been more likely to have had his hands free.”

The report shows the fuel switches were moved one second apart – and approximately 10 seconds later, the switches were both back on. The jetliner crashed shortly after takeoff near Ahmedabad airport, killing 242 people. There was only one survivor.

The initial data has prompted some U.S. officials to call for a criminal investigation into the crash.

Some experts suggest a deliberate act

A former senior NTSB official who assisted in the U.S.-led probe into the crash of EgyptAir Flight 990 in 1999, Ben Berman, told the Journal that the preliminary report, which shows that the fuel switches were shut off in succession, just one second apart, indicates a deliberate action.

Berman added that, prior to the fuel shutoff, there was no indication of trouble during what should have been a routine takeoff and ascent.

“There was nothing to prompt the crew to perform emergency procedures, become stressed, or do anything except rotate the nose up and retract the landing gear, like they had done so many times before,” Berman told the Journal.

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

Of the 241 people on board when an Air India plane crashed on June 12, only one survived. He reportedly “walked away” from the wreckage before being treated at a hospital.

Investigators push back against early conclusions

However, the preliminary report did not reach any definitive conclusion about what exactly led to the crash or why the fuel switches were shut off. The report does not rule out potential design flaws or equipment issues as potential factors in the aviation disaster. Investigators are also being assisted by aviation medicine and psychology experts.

The chief executive of Air India, Campbell Wilson, has called on airline staff to refrain from drawing early conclusions about the tragedy and described the investigation as “far from over.” A representative for the airline said Air India is continuing to cooperate with the ongoing investigation.

When pressed for comment on the Journal’s report about the pilots, a press officer for India’s Ministry of Civil Aviation and Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau declined to elaborate.

The ongoing probe

As the Journal notes, aviation crashes potentially involving deliberate actions are especially hard to solve because of incomplete data and disputed interpretations. Such investigations can often take a year or longer, and final information that emerges can sometimes contradict early findings.

Cockpit recordings have been tightly controlled by Indian investigators and are seen as a key to uncovering the series of events that happened in the flight’s tragic final moments.

NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy has reportedly been fully briefed on the details of the investigation, including cockpit recordings and data from the flight’s data recorder. Homendy said her aim is to quickly find out “whether the crash presented any immediate safety concerns to the traveling public.”

Boeing and the Federal Aviation Administration have not issued any advisories or safety directives to 787 Dreamliner operators in response to the crash.

Tags: , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

Emerging details from the investigation into the Air India crash raise serious questions about cockpit procedures, pilot decision-making and airline safety practices, with potential implications for aviation safety protocols worldwide.

Pilot actions and decision-making

According to preliminary reports cited by The Wall Street Journal, actions taken by the pilots, specifically the switching off of fuel controls, are under scrutiny as critical factors in the crash, influencing the direction and focus of the investigation.

Investigation and transparency

Authorities such as India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau and the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board are conducting a comprehensive probe, with officials urging caution against drawing early conclusions and emphasizing the need for transparency and accurate findings.

Aviation safety and accountability

The incident has prompted calls for further review of airline safety measures, operational training and possible criminal investigation, underscoring the broader impact of the findings on aviation industry standards and public confidence.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 110 media outlets

Debunking

Pilot associations and several experts challenge the interpretation that pilot error, specifically intentional fuel cut-off, is proven. According to the Federation of Indian Pilots, the preliminary report “makes no mention of the pilots turning off the switches,” stating that such speculation is not supported by the data released.

History lesson

Past aviation incidents, such as the 2019 All Nippon Airways Boeing 787 incident, were cited as examples where technical malfunctions — not pilot error — caused fuel cutoff. These historical parallels highlight the importance of exhaustive investigations and caution against early attributions of human error without complete evidence.

Quote bank

"Assigning blame before a thorough, transparent, and data-driven investigation is both premature and irresponsible," said the Federation of Indian Pilots. Air India CEO Campbell Wilson advised staff, the investigation was "far from over." Civil Aviation Minister Kinjarapu Ram Mohan Naidu stated, “one should not jump to conclusions till the final report is released.”

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the Air India crash probe with an emphasis on individual accountability and human error, using emotionally charged terms like “doomed” and “deliberately cut off fuel” to highlight the captain’s potential misconduct and cockpit chaos.
  • Media outlets in the center adopt a technical, neutral tone, de-emphasizing personal blame and spotlighting regulatory inspections clearing mechanical fault.
  • Media outlets on the right zero in on the pilot’s demeanor with phrases such as “eerily calm” and speculates on mental health issues, often deploying sensationalist language that stokes suspicion while advancing alternative causal theories like software glitches.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

116 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A junior pilot asked the captain why the fuel switches were off before the crash, indicating surprise and panic, as reported by The Wall Street Journal.
  • The captain appeared calm during the incident, according to the report.
  • Air India Chief Executive Campbell Wilson stated that the report identified no cause and did not make recommendations.
  • The Airline Pilots' Association of India urged caution against premature conclusions, emphasizing that the investigation is ongoing.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • A cockpit voice recording indicates that an Air India junior pilot questioned the captain's decision to turn off the plane's fuel supply switches.
  • Indian regulators have ordered airlines to inspect the locking mechanisms on fuel control switches of Boeing aircraft following the crash of an Air India jet.
  • Air India found no issues with the locking mechanisms on the fuel control switches of its Boeing 787 aircraft during precautionary inspections.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A report states that Captain Sumeet Sabharwal cut the fuel flow of flight AI 171 after takeoff, resulting in a crash that killed 240 passengers, according to The Wall Street Journal.
  • The AAIB's preliminary report noted that one pilot asked about the fuel switch but did not identify who turned it off after takeoff.
  • U.S. aviation expert Mary Schiavo disputes claims of human error, suggesting a software glitch in the Boeing 787 caused the fuel cut-off.
  • The Federation of Indian Pilots criticized the interpretation of the preliminary report, urging against premature conclusions that harm crew integrity.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™