Republicans are concerned about Trump admin’s handling of sensitive intel


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Worry on Capitol Hill

A new survey found 76% of members of Congress are concerned about the Trump administration's handling of sensitive materials. That includes 100% of Democrats and 52% of Republicans.

'Signalgate'

The survey was conducted after a reporter revealed former National Security Adviser Mike Waltz accidentally added him to a group chat that included sensitive attack plans.

No next steps

Staffers doubt there will be a congressional investigation into the matter, nor legislation changing the rules for handling classified info.


Most members of Congress, including Republicans, are concerned about the Trump administration’s handling of sensitive materials. A new survey of senior staff on Capitol Hill from Punchbowl News found 76% said their boss is worried.

Breaking it down by party, 100% of Democrats said they’re concerned, in addition to 52% of Republicans.

When was the survey conducted?

The survey began April 7, two weeks after The Atlantic’s Editor-in-Chief Jeffrey Goldberg revealed former National Security Adviser Mike Waltz accidentally added him to a Signal group chat in which cabinet members discussed the political implications and attack plans for air strikes on Houthi rebels in Yemen. They concluded the survey on April 28, three days before Waltz was removed as national security adviser and nominated by President Donald Trump to be the next U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.

What do lawmakers think of ‘Signalgate?’

Lawmakers didn’t see that coming. When asked “What do you think will happen as a result of the Signal chat scandal,” 59% said nothing, 21% said Waltz is likely to be fired, and 9% said Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is likely to be fired.

84% of respondents said their bosses are concerned about Goldberg being added to the chat, including 98% of Democrats and 70% of Republicans.

The staffers also didn’t think Congress would do anything about the incident, which has become known as “Signalgate.” Just 5% said Congress will pass new laws regarding handling of classified documents and 25% said Congress will open an investigation. 

Republicans control Congress so that means they decide whether to open an investigation and what the scope would be.

Tags: , , , ,

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

Concerns about the handling of sensitive materials and secure communications at the highest levels of the U.S. government highlight potential risks to national security and oversight processes.

Handling of sensitive info

Improper communication regarding national security topics raises concerns about information security and the safeguarding of classified material.

Congressional oversight

Lawmakers' reactions reflect skepticism about institutional accountability and the likelihood that any legislative or investigative response will result from the incident.

Political implications

The incident's timing and the responses of both parties suggest broader impacts on political dynamics, appointments, and public trust in government operations.

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more