Ryan Routh found guilty of attempted Trump shooting, tries to stab himself with pen


Summary

Convicted

A federal jury convicted Ryan Routh of attempting to assassinate Donald Trump at his Florida golf course in 2024.

Evidence

Routh, who represented himself at trial, was found guilty on multiple federal charges after prosecutors linked him to a scoped rifle and a confession letter.

Pre-meditated

The nearly three-week trial revealed Routh had made 17 trips to the golf course while planning the attack.


Full story

A federal jury convicted a man of attempting to assassinate President Donald Trump at his West Palm Beach, Florida, golf course in 2024. Ryan Routh, 59, was found guilty of attempted assassination of a major presidential candidate, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison.

Routh was also found guilty of possessing a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence, assaulting a federal officer, being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition and possession of a firearm with an obliterated serial number.

According to reports, after the verdict was read, Routh attempted to stab himself in the neck with a pen before authorities stopped him.

During the trial in Fort Pierce, Florida, prosecutors argued that Routh had spent several weeks planning to kill Trump. They said Routh was excessively stalking Trump and that he made 17 separate trips to Trump’s golf course before the incident last year.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Rifle found hidden near golf course

According to court documents, on Sept. 15, 2024, Routh was arrested after hiding in a wooded area of Trump International Golf Course, where then-candidate Trump was playing. A Secret Service agent was doing a security sweep around the perimeter of an area and saw part of a man’s face hidden in the brush near the fence line with a rifle pointed at the agent. The man was later confirmed to be Routh.

FBI agents searched the area where he had been hiding and found a SKS semiautomatic rifle equipped with a scope, an extended magazine, and a defaced serial number.

A witness at the trial told the court that Routh left a box at his house in April, after one of Routh’s trips to the area near Trump’s golf course. According to the DOJ, inside the box was a handwritten letter from Routh, admitting, “This was an assassination attempt on Donald Trump but I am so sorry I failed you.”

Trump, DOJ respond to verdict

During the nearly three-week trial, Routh represented himself and argued that he never actually intended to kill anyone. He chose not to testify during his trial.

The incident was the second attempted assassination in a two-month period on Trump’s life. The first attempt happened in July 2024, during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. During that attack, Trump was shot at, and a bullet grazed his ear, resulting in a minor injury. The shooter hit 50-year-old retired fire chief Corey Comperatore, who died from the gunshot wound.

Trump responded to the verdict on Truth Social, writing in part, “This was an evil man with an evil intention, and they caught him. I would also like to thank the Secret Service, Department of Florida Law Enforcement, and the wonderful person who spotted him running from the site of the crime, and acted by following him, and getting all information on car type and license plate to the Sheriff’s Office, IMMEDIATELY, which led to his arrest and conviction. What incredible instinct and foresight this person had — A very big moment for JUSTICE IN AMERICA!”

The Department of Justice also released a statement following the verdict.

“This verdict sends a clear message. An attempt to assassinate a presidential candidate is an attack on our Republic and on the rights of every citizen,” Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a statement. “The Department of Justice will relentlessly pursue those who try to silence political voices, and no enemy, foreign or domestic, will ever silence the will of the American people. I want to thank and congratulate the trial team and our law enforcement partners for their outstanding work and dedication in bringing this case to justice.”

Tags: , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The conviction of Ryan Routh for the attempted assassination of President Donald Trump highlights ongoing concerns about political violence and the protection of public figures during a period of heightened political tension in the United States.

Political violence

The case underscores increasing incidents of political violence targeting public officials, raising questions about security, political discourse, and the stability of democratic processes.

Legal and security response

The swift investigation, prosecution, and conviction, as reported by multiple sources, demonstrate law enforcement and judicial priorities in addressing threats against public figures and maintaining public safety.

Intent and criminal justice

The trial centered on the issue of criminal intent, with prosecutors and Routh disputing his motives and actions, reflecting the legal complexities of prosecuting attempted political assassinations even when a shot was not fired.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 192 media outlets

Context corner

Assassination attempts on major political figures, particularly U.S. presidents, have a long history in America, often sparking national debate about security measures and political polarization.

Diverging views

Right-leaning sources emphasize the premeditated nature of the attack and the swift justice delivered, while left-leaning articles more frequently describe Routh’s courtroom behavior and background, sometimes providing more personal context or questioning mental health factors.

Oppo research

Some opponents of heightened security policies argue increased restrictions at public events could harm freedom of assembly while others cite civil liberties concerns around political surveillance.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

297 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.