Senators push sweeping Russia sanctions as Trump urges caution


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Sanctions push

A bipartisan Senate bill would impose severe economic penalties on Russia if it refuses to negotiate a ceasefire with Ukraine. The legislation has more than 80 Senate co-sponsors and includes sweeping primary and secondary sanctions.

Tariff trigger

The bill proposes a 500% tariff on imports from any country that continues buying Russian oil, gas, uranium or petroleum products. It also bans U.S. purchases of Russian sovereign debt and blocks investments in affiliated entities.

White House caution

Despite Senate momentum, the Trump administration has warned that sanctions could derail peace talks. Secretary of State Marco Rubio says Russia may soon propose a ceasefire framework.


Full story

A bipartisan group of U.S. senators is advancing legislation that would impose sweeping sanctions on Russia if President Vladimir Putin refuses to engage in serious ceasefire negotiations with Ukraine. The bill, titled the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025, was introduced by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and currently has more than 80 Senate co-sponsors.

“If we can get a ceasefire and negotiations, great. We’ll wait,” Graham said in an interview with Bloomberg. “But if Putin keeps playing games, we are going to move.” He added that the Senate may act on the bill within days if no progress is made.

The push reflects growing frustration in Congress over Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine and the lack of concrete progress in peace talks, despite recent diplomatic outreach by President Donald Trump.

What would the sanctions bill include?

Tariffs

A proposed bipartisan bill would slap 500% tariffs on countries that continue buying Russian oil and gas unless Putin stops stalling on ceasefire negotiations.

The legislation would authorize the president to impose sanctions on the Russian government, military, state-aligned financial institutions and energy companies. The bill also includes a 500% tariff on imports from any country that continues to buy Russian oil, natural gas, uranium or other petroleum products.

Additionally, the bill would:

  • Ban U.S. purchases of Russian sovereign debt
  • Prohibit investments by U.S. financial institutions in Russian state-linked entities
  • Bar the listing or trading of Russian-affiliated companies on U.S. securities exchanges
  • Freeze the assets and revoke visas of Russian political and military leaders
  • Prohibit uranium imports from Russia and impose sanctions on buyers of Russian-origin uranium abroad
  • Require blocking of SWIFT-like financial services for sanctioned Russian banks

Under Section 4 of the bill, these sanctions would be triggered by a presidential “covered determination” that Russia has refused to negotiate peace, violated a peace agreement or launched another military invasion of Ukraine.

How is the White House responding to the legislation?

Despite overwhelming Senate support, the Trump administration has urged lawmakers to hold off. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told senators on Tuesday, May 20, that new sanctions risk undermining fragile backchannel talks. “If you start threatening sanctions, the Russians will stop talking,” Rubio said at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing.

Rubio added that Russia is expected to submit a proposed ceasefire “term sheet” in the coming days, which will allow U.S. officials to assess Moscow’s intentions.

Could the bill advance without Trump’s support?

The measure would also need to pass the House, where GOP leadership remains closely aligned with the Trump White House. Graham acknowledged that if the administration opposes the legislation, lawmakers might attempt a discharge petition to force a vote, a maneuver that circumvents leadership.

Still, backers of the bill remain confident. “We are beyond pleased that we now have 81 cosponsors,” Graham and Blumenthal said in a joint statement, describing the sanctions as “hard-hitting.”

U.S. Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker told Bloomberg TV he believes the administration and Congress will ultimately work in tandem. “I fully expect that that will be hand in glove and hopefully advance the peace process ultimately,” Whitaker said.

Jonah Applegarth (Production Specialist), Kaleb Gillespie (Video Editor), and Matt Bishop (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

A bipartisan Senate push for new sanctions against Russia, contingent on its actions in Ukraine, highlights ongoing U.S. legislative efforts to influence Moscow’s behavior while exposing divisions within the American government over diplomatic and punitive strategies.

Bipartisan legislation

Broad bipartisan Senate support for the proposed sanctions bill demonstrates strong legislative resolve to hold Russia accountable for its actions in Ukraine, regardless of party affiliation.

Diplomatic versus punitive measures

The tension between imposing new sanctions and pursuing diplomatic negotiations, as highlighted by contrasting views from Congress and the Trump administration, underscores key policy debates over the best approach to encouraging peace in Ukraine.

Impact on U.S.-Russia relations

The possibility of expansive new sanctions and associated tariffs, along with threats to block Russian access to international financial systems, may have significant repercussions for U.S.-Russia ties and the broader geopolitical landscape.

Timeline

Timeline