Skydance-Paramount deal could land Trump even more than $16M: Report


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Paramount settlement

Trump said the $16 million settlement with Paramount included an additional advertising agreement.

Reported side deal

Skydance, which is seeking a merger with Paramount, reportedly offered public service ads promoting Trump’s causes.

Side deal denial

Paramount denies any connection to a reported public service announcement agreement.


Full story

Questions are swirling over what President Donald Trump received in a settlement with Paramount, CBS’s parent company. Paramount agreed to pay Trump $16 million to settle a lawsuit he filed over the network’s editing of a “60 Minutes” interview with Kamala Harris.

However, some reports suggest that a side deal may have been involved. Following the settlement announcement, President Trump told reporters a second agreement was on the table, worth more than the $16 million in free advertisement.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

According to a White House pool report, Washington Post reporter Cat Zakrzewski asked Trump on Thursday, July 3, about the settlement. He responded, “We did a deal for about $16 million plus 16 million, or maybe more than that in advertising.”

Report suggests Skydance offered PSA deal

The New York Post reported last week that Skydance—the company pursuing a merger with Paramount pending FCC approval—allegedly told Trump it would run between $15 million to $20 million worth of public service announcements promoting causes associated with him.

Skydance CEO David Ellison is the son of Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, a known ally of the president.

While Trump appeared to lump the advertising deal in with Paramount’s settlement, the company has denied any connection to a public service announcement arrangement with Skydance. The merger between Paramount and Skydance has not yet received regulatory approval.

Paramount denies side deal included in settlement

A Paramount spokesperson said in a statement, “Paramount has no knowledge of any promises or commitments made to President Trump other than those set forth in the settlement.”

Paramount says the $16 million payout covers Trump’s legal fees, as well as a donation to his future presidential library. The company also agreed to release transcripts of future “60 Minutes” interviews with presidential candidates — but made clear it will not issue an apology.

Skydance has not commented on the alleged public service announcement deal.

According to Paramount, even if a separate agreement exists between Skydance and the Trump administration—which has not been confirmed—Paramount says it is not involved.

Some Democrats and journalists are calling for an investigation into the $16 million settlement, labeling it a possible bribe to secure approval for Skydance’s $8 billion merger with Paramount. Paramount has denied the allegation.

Alex Delia (Deputy Managing Editor), Lawrence Banton (Digital Producer), and Zachary Hill (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The settlement in which Paramount agreed to pay $16 million to resolve a lawsuit from President Donald Trump over a "60 Minutes" interview editing dispute raises questions about press freedom, legal strategy and the influence of political power over media companies engaged in sensitive regulatory and business maneuvers.

Press freedom

Many legal experts and advocacy groups, as reported by NPR and Reuters, warn that such settlements may set a precedent encouraging further legal action against news organizations, potentially undermining First Amendment protections and journalistic independence.

Media lawsuits and legal tactics

The use of consumer protection and other non-defamation laws, described by critics in the Wall Street Journal and other outlets, represents a shift in legal strategies against media organizations and may encourage similar future attempts to challenge editorial decisions outside traditional libel standards.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 529 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Paramount agreed to a $16 million settlement, which is substantially less than the $20 billion initially sought by Trump. The payment will go toward Trump’s future presidential library and covers legal fees, not personal payouts. This figure is similar to settlements by other media companies with Trump, such as ABC’s $15 million and Meta’s $25 million, reflecting significant legal costs for media organizations.

History lesson

There is historical precedent for political figures taking legal action against media outlets, but traditionally, U.S. courts have upheld strong First Amendment protections for the press. Legal experts referenced in these articles note that using consumer protection laws in this manner is relatively new, raising questions about evolving tactics to challenge news organizations.

Oppo research

Opponents of the settlement—including press freedom organizations, some CBS journalists, and Democratic lawmakers—argue that settling could embolden further lawsuits against media companies and potentially chill press freedom. They have voiced opposition in open letters, threatened lawsuits against Paramount’s board, and raised the possibility of congressional inquiries or legal scrutiny for potential bribery or regulatory manipulation.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the $16 million Paramount settlement as a troubling capitulation that “weaponizes the courts” and threatens First Amendment freedoms, emphasizing Trump’s claims as “dubious” and the settlement as an “outrageous” blow to journalistic independence.
  • Media outlets in the center de-emphasize the partisan conflict, focusing on corporate pressures and merger implications.
  • Media outlets on the right hails the settlement as a “win for the American people,” portraying Paramount and CBS as “forced to pay” for “deceptively editing” Kamala Harris’ interview, using charged language like “massive” and “deceptively” to underscore media bias and vindicate Trump.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

131 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Paramount Global has agreed to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit from President Trump regarding a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris.
  • The settlement will allocate funds to Trump's presidential library, with no direct payments made to him or Rep. Ronny Jackson.
  • As part of the agreement, 60 Minutes will release transcripts of presidential candidate interviews after airing, subject to legal concerns.
  • Trump alleged that the interview was deceptively edited to mislead the public, a claim CBS denied during the lawsuit.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On July 2, 2025, Paramount Global agreed to pay $16 million to settle President Trump's lawsuit over edits made to a '60 Minutes' interview with Kamala Harris.
  • The lawsuit stemmed from Trump's claim that CBS deceptively edited Harris' answer, which he called 'horrendous' and election-threatening, to boost her chances in November 2024.
  • CBS acknowledged editing the interview as routine and faced FCC scrutiny, with Chairman Carr ordering release of raw footage confirming the network's account amid a news distortion inquiry.
  • The settlement includes a release of all claims against CBS reporting, with Paramount stating no money will go directly to Trump, allocating funds to his future presidential library, and promising transcript transparency.
  • Paramount chose to settle to avoid costly litigation and ease FCC approval of its $8 billion Skydance sale, though the decision sparked criticism for ceding First Amendment ground and prompted executive departures.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Paramount has agreed to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit from Donald Trump over the editing of a "60 Minutes" interview with Kamala Harris, as reported by CBS.
  • The settlement funds will go to Trump's planned presidential library, and Paramount stated it does not involve an apology.
  • As part of the settlement, Paramount will publish transcripts of future "60 Minutes" interviews with presidential candidates, with some redactions allowed for legal reasons.
  • The controversy has raised concerns about media freedom and Trump's influence over news coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

Timeline

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.