Slotkin refuses voluntary DOJ interview over ‘illegal orders’ video


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Slotkin refuses

Sen. Elissa Slotkin says she will not voluntarily sit down with the Department of Justice for an interview regarding a video she and five other Democrats made, urging military members to ignore unlawful orders.

Her remarks

Slotkin criticized the Trump administration’s response, saying she will not “legitimize their actions” and suggested she could sue over alleged First Amendment violations.

Houlahan refuses

Rep. Chrissy Houlahan later said she, too, will not voluntarily participate in an interview.


Full story

Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., says she will not voluntarily participate in a Department of Justice investigation tied to a video she and five other Democratic lawmakers released urging U.S. military members to ignore unlawful orders. 

In a video posted on X on Thursday, Slotkin said she sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro, informing them she will not sit for a voluntary interview.

The letter described the lawmakers’ message as “uncontroversial and incontrovertible,” according to The Washington Post.

Slotkin criticized the Trump administration’s response to the video, saying, “I am not going to legitimize their actions.” 

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Administration’s response

The video was first posted on Slotkin’s account in November and featured Sen. Mark Kelly and Reps. Jason Crow, Chris Deluzio, Maggie Goodlander and Chrissy Houlahan — all veterans of the armed services or intelligence community.

After the video’s release, President Donald Trump accused the lawmakers of sedition in a Truth Social post, calling their actions “punishable by DEATH.” The administration later launched an investigation into the lawmakers involved. 

Separately, the Pentagon ordered a review of Kelly that could result in his retirement rank being downgraded, along with a reduction in his military pay. However, a federal judge has since expressed skepticism about that effort and is expected to rule next week.

Slotkin says she will not voluntarily comply with the DOJ’s request. 

What Slotkin is saying

“The video was public. I’ve done a ton of public talking about it since then, including now, and our constitution is crystal clear on the issue of freedom of speech,” Slotkin said in her video posted on X Thursday. 

She said some lawyers advised her to keep her head down and stay quiet, but she rejected that approach. 

“That’s exactly what the Trump administration and Jeanine Pirro want — they’re purposely using physical and legal intimidation to get me to shut up,” Slotkin said. “More importantly, they’re using that intimidation to deter others from speaking out against the administration. The intimidation is the point, and I’m not going to go along with that.”

In the video, Slotkin also said she would consider suing for “infringement of my constitutional rights.”

Houlhan also refuses

Rep. Houlahan posted her own video on Thursday, saying she will also not voluntarily sit down for an interview. 

“I will not be doing that,” Houlahan said, adding that the video was released by six members of Congress “who have won this nation’s uniform or served in its defense.”

She said, “It told the truth. It stated facts. It reiterated the law. And it exercised speech explicitly protected by the First Amendment.”

Pirro’s office declined to comment on the matter, and the Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Tags: , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The dispute involving Senator Elissa Slotkin’s refusal to participate in a Justice Department investigation over a video urging the military not to follow illegal orders raises concerns about free speech, government power, and the boundaries of political dissent.

Free speech and constitutional rights

The case centers on whether members of Congress can be investigated or prosecuted for publicly reminding military members of their legal obligation to refuse unlawful orders, highlighting debates over First Amendment protections for lawmakers.

Government investigation and intimidation

Multiple sources report that Senator Slotkin and other lawmakers perceive the investigation as an attempt by the Trump administration to silence or intimidate political opponents, raising questions about the appropriate use of federal law enforcement.

Civil-military relations and legal orders

The events spotlight the responsibilities of military personnel regarding unlawful orders, the role of elected officials in communicating these duties, and the broader implications for the relationship between the military, intelligence agencies, and civilian government.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 79 media outlets

Context corner

The principle that military personnel are obligated to refuse illegal orders is a long-standing doctrine in U.S. military law, emphasized by the Uniform Code of Military Justice and reiterated during previous national debates on military conduct.

History lesson

Past incidents, such as the My Lai Massacre during the Vietnam War, have reinforced the legal and ethical obligation of military personnel to disobey unlawful orders, a principle codified in U.S. military law.

Policy impact

The inquiry and related fallout could influence future congressional speech involving military issues, and disciplinary action against lawmakers with military backgrounds may impact civil-military relations and legal precedent.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame Senator Slotkin's refusal of a Justice Department inquiry as "hitting back" against a "sham probe" driven by "retribution" and "intimidation," even highlighting her considering a lawsuit.
  • Media outlets in the center neutrally describe the situation as "escalating a dispute.
  • Media outlets on the right portray her as "rejecting" a legitimate inquiry, labeling the involved lawmakers the "seditious six" and emphasizing she is "under federal investigation.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

81 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Democratic Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan is refusing to voluntarily comply with a Justice Department investigation into a video about resisting illegal orders, according to her lawyer's letters to U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro and Attorney General Pam Bondi.
  • Slotkin asserted that her constitutional rights have been infringed and that litigation is being considered, indicating a significant escalation in the dispute with the Justice Department.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Thursday, Sen. Elissa Slotkin declined a DOJ interview, with Bharara stating, "It is therefore perplexing that the Department of Justice has begun an inquiry into the matter."
  • A 90-second video posted last November urged U.S. service members to refuse unlawful orders, and the FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C. sought voluntary interviews of the six lawmakers.
  • Threats against Slotkin included a bomb threat to Slotkin's Michigan farm, swatting of Slotkin's parents, and a police detail for Slotkin's brother amid the fallout from the video.
  • Slotkin's legal team argued that her constitutional rights were infringed and that the refusal shifts the burden to the Justice Department to decide on escalation or retreat.
  • The video coincided with U.S. Military Caribbean airstrikes linked to at least 126 deaths and triggered Pentagon administrative actions against Sen. Mark Kelly, highlighting broader institutional and political fallout.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan refuses to cooperate with a Justice Department investigation regarding a video she organized, urging military members to resist illegal orders.
  • Slotkin's legal team informed U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro that she will not agree to a voluntary interview and is seeking to preserve relevant documents for anticipated litigation.
  • Slotkin reported threats against her family and stated that her constitutional rights had been infringed, indicating that she is considering litigation against the Justice Department.
  • Slotkin has connected with other lawmakers involved in the video controversy and emphasized the importance of fighting back against the Justice Department's inquiry.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.