
South American soccer head: Expand 2030 World Cup to 64 teams
By Chris Francis (Sports Reporter), Joey Nunez (Video Editor), Oly Noneza (Motion Graphic Designer)
- The head of CONMEBOL, the governing body of South American soccer, called on FIFA to expand the 2030 World Cup. He is the second official to call for a 64-team tournament.
- Alejandro Domínguez said expansion would be a unique way to honor the 100th anniversary of the world’s biggest sporting event.
- The U.S., Canada and Mexico will host the 2026 World Cup, which will be the first to expand from 32 teams to 48.
Full Story
The FIFA World Cup is the world’s biggest and most popular sporting event — by a mile. Now, there is yet another call to make it even bigger, at least for the 2030 competition.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Alejandro Dominguez, president of CONMEBOL, proposed to expand the men's 2030 World Cup from 32 teams to 64 on April 10.
- Dominguez stated, "We are convinced that the centennial celebration will be unique because 100 years are celebrated only once."
- If approved by FIFA, the tournament will have 128 matches, doubling the previous format of 64 games from 1998 to 2022.
- Critics, including UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin, believe a 64-team World Cup would weaken the quality of play and devalue the qualifying program.
- Alejandro Dominguez, CONMEBOL president, proposed expanding the 2030 World Cup to 64 teams on Thursday.
- Dominguez made the proposal during CONMEBOL's 80th Ordinary Congress in Buenos Aires.
- The proposed expansion aims to include more nations in the centennial celebration across three continents.
- Dominguez stated this expansion means "nobody on the planet is left out of the party."
- UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin expressed skepticism, calling the proposal "a bad idea."
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Who wants to expand the World Cup tournament?
On Thursday, April 10, the president of CONMEBOL, the governing body of soccer in South America, became the latest high-ranking official to propose expanding the World Cup from 48 teams to 64.
Alejandro Domínguez believes the expansion would be a unique way to celebrate the event’s 100th anniversary. It would also be a one-time change to the format, at least for now.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
The 2030 World Cup is already scheduled to spread out over the largest geographic area in tournament history, with six countries on three continents hosting games. Uruguay, Paraguay, Argentina, Spain, Portugal and Morocco will all have game action. Uruguay, which hosted the first cup in 1930, was the first nation to suggest a 64-team expansion on March 6.
The expansion would likely allow all ten CONMEBOL members to make the tournament, including Venezuela, which has never qualified for the World Cup.
“We are convinced that the centennial celebration will be unique because 100 years are celebrated only once. That is why we are proposing, for the first time, to hold this anniversary with 64 teams on three continents simultaneously,” Domínguez said in a speech to his members. “This will allow all countries to have the opportunity to live the world experience, and so nobody on the planet is left out of the party.”
Who is against the expansion and why?
A bigger party was considered when the World Cup expanded from 32 to 48 teams for the upcoming 2026 event, which will be held in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. But not everyone is on the expansion bandwagon. On April 3, UEFA president Aleksander Čeferin was blunt in his assessment.
“This proposal was maybe more surprising for me than for you,” Čeferin said. “I think it’s a bad idea. I think it’s not a good idea for the World Cup itself, and it’s not a good idea for our qualifiers as well, you know? So, I’m not supporting that idea. I don’t know where it came from.”
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Čeferin alluded to the drawbacks that FIFA will debate, mainly the watering down of the competition and qualifying criteria. Significant travel and logistical challenges will also be a consideration. Having many more teams in a 128-game format means more venues and infrastructure.
Money could be the determining factor. Adding 16 more teams appears to have support from FIFA president Gianni Infantino, who typically sees more competition and more venues as a way to raise money and grow the game.
[Chris Francis]
The world’s biggest and most popular sporting event – by a mile – is the World Cup and there is yet another call to make it even bigger. At least for the 2030 competition.
Thursday, the president of CONMEBOL, the governing body of soccer in South America, became the latest high ranking official to propose expanding the World Cup from 48 teams to 64. Alejandro Domínguez believes the expansion would be a unique way to celebrate the 100th anniversary of the event. It would also be a one-time change at least for now.
The 2030 World Cup is already scheduled to spread out over the largest geographic area in tournament history with six countries on three continents hosting games. Uruguay, Paraguay, Argentina, Spain, Portugal and Morocco. Uruguay, which hosted the first Cup in 1930, was the first nation to suggest a 64 team expansion.
The expansion would likely allow all 10 CONMEBOL members to make the tournament including Venezuela who have never qualified for the World Cup. In a speech to his members Dominguez said. “This will allow all countries to have the opportunity to live the world experience and so nobody on the planet is left out of the party,”
A bigger party was the consideration when the World Cup expanded from 32 to 48 teams for the upcoming 2026 tournament to be held in the US, Canada and Mexico.
But not everyone is on board. Last week, UEFA president Aleksander Čeferin was blunt in his assessment.
[Aleksander Čeferin UEFA president]
“This proposal was maybe more surprising for me than for you. I think it’s a bad idea. I think it’s not a good idea for the World Cup itself and it’s not a good idea for our qualifiers as well, you know? So, I’m not supporting that idea, I don’t know where it came from.”
[Chris Francis]
Some of the drawbacks that will be debated by FIFA as they decide whether to expand are the watering down of the competition and of qualifying criteria. And the significant travel and logistical challenges. Having so many more teams means more venues and more infrastructure.
As you might guess, the bottom line could be the determining factor. Adding 16 more teams appears to have support from FIFA president Gianni Infantino, who typically sees more competition and more venues as a way to raise money and grow the game.
For Straight Arrow News I’m Chris Francis.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Alejandro Dominguez, president of CONMEBOL, proposed to expand the men's 2030 World Cup from 32 teams to 64 on April 10.
- Dominguez stated, "We are convinced that the centennial celebration will be unique because 100 years are celebrated only once."
- If approved by FIFA, the tournament will have 128 matches, doubling the previous format of 64 games from 1998 to 2022.
- Critics, including UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin, believe a 64-team World Cup would weaken the quality of play and devalue the qualifying program.
- Alejandro Dominguez, CONMEBOL president, proposed expanding the 2030 World Cup to 64 teams on Thursday.
- Dominguez made the proposal during CONMEBOL's 80th Ordinary Congress in Buenos Aires.
- The proposed expansion aims to include more nations in the centennial celebration across three continents.
- Dominguez stated this expansion means "nobody on the planet is left out of the party."
- UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin expressed skepticism, calling the proposal "a bad idea."
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Getty Images
More than 100 people detained, dozens of drugs seized in Colorado club raid
Read10 hrs ago -
REUTERS/Chris Helgren
Driver kills at least 11, injures more than 20 others at Vancouver Filipino festival
Read14 hrs ago -
Ukrainian Presidential Press Office via AP
Trump and Zelenskyy hold ‘symbolic’ talk before Pope Francis’ funeral
ReadSaturday -
MARCO BELLO/AFP via Getty Images
Bondi rescinds journalist protections amid focus on government leaks
ReadFriday