State AGs sue 23andMe over auction, say don’t sell customer DNA


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Pending auction

More than two-dozen state Attorneys General sued to block 23andMe's impending bankruptcy auction, arguing customers should have a say.

Sensitive data

The company holds biological samples, DNA data, health-related traits and medical records for 15 million customers around the world. 

DNA in the wrong hands

23andMe board member Anne Wojcicki said she is concerned that China is leading the way in biotech and wants to obtain more genetic information.


Full story

More than two dozen states are suing the genetic testing company 23andMe over its proposed bankruptcy sale, stating customers did not sign up to have their DNA sold to the highest bidder. The bipartisan attorneys general argue that customers should have control over their personal information and that it cannot be sold like ordinary property.

“This isn’t just data – it’s your DNA. It’s personal, permanent, and deeply private,” Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield stated. 

The company holds biological samples, DNA data, health-related traits and medical records for approximately 15 million customers worldwide.

What will happen to the private information?

There are two bidders – Regeneron, a biotech company, and the nonprofit medical research organization TTAM Research Institute. They are both American enterprises, and both agreed to keep the current privacy and consent policies in place. 

“Not only did they say they’re not going to change anything. They also agreed to that in their contract, which is an asset purchase agreement, in writing,” 23andMe Interim CEO Joseph Selsavage told Congress Tuesday

The company says it has the following principles: 

  • Never share individual-level data without the user’s consent.
  • Clearly communicate how data is used and give customers control over their data-sharing preferences. 
  • Use industry-standard encryption, access controls and monitoring systems to protect data.
  • Personal information and genetic data are stored separately to protect identity. 

“All of your personal information, meaning your name, your address, your email, was in a separate database, that was stored separately, that very few people could connect it then with the genetic information,” Founder and Board Member Anne Wojcicki stated. “Few people in the company could put that key together.”   

Selsavage said genetic data storage is both digital and physical, all of which can be deleted or destroyed at a customer’s request. 

System is not perfect

In 2019, the Pentagon instructed all service members not to use consumer DNA kits, as sharing personal, sensitive genetic information with outside parties poses both personal and operational risks. It also warned that some results could be inaccurate, which could create problems for military members who are required to report medical issues. 

In October 2023, it was revealed that 23andMe experienced a cyber attack that affected approximately 7 million customers. An investigation revealed that it was a credential stuffing campaign in which scammers obtained usernames and passwords on the dark web and attempted to use them on multiple sites, hoping that people use the same email and password across various accounts.

Concerns raised

Now, there are concerns that the data could fall into the hands of a foreign adversary, particularly China.

“I do not believe that anyone in this bankruptcy process should have a Chinese tie,” Wojcicki said. 

WuXi Healthcare Ventures, a Chinese company, invested $10 million in 23andMe in 2015. Regeneron has close ties with multiple Chinese companies with which it has exclusive licensing deals for medical products. 

“I am concerned about China and how China is leading in biotechnology. And I am concerned that China has been super clear that they would like to have the most genetic information, they would like to lead,” Wojcicki said. 

What happens next?

There will be another round of bidding in the coming days, and a sale hearing is set in bankruptcy court for June 17. 

Snorre Wik (Photographer/Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , ,

Why this story matters

A coalition of states has filed a lawsuit to block 23andMe from selling personal genetic data during bankruptcy proceedings without customer consent, highlighting legal and ethical concerns about privacy and control over sensitive biological information.

Data privacy

Control over how personal genetic and health information is handled is central due to the sensitive and permanent nature of DNA data, as emphasized by state attorneys general.

Consent and ownership

The debate about whether customers' genetic data can be treated as ordinary property in bankruptcy underscores fundamental questions of consent and individual rights over immutable personal information.

Corporate responsibility

23andMe's bankruptcy, previous data breaches, and assurances by potential buyers to uphold privacy policies raise wider issues about how companies are expected to protect consumer data even during financial distress or ownership changes.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 72 media outlets

Context corner

Genetic testing companies like 23andMe rose in popularity in the past decade, with many consumers embracing at-home DNA kits. However, such services collect highly personal data. Recent high-profile data breaches, changing business landscapes and increased regulatory scrutiny have highlighted ongoing questions about ownership, use and protection of genetic information.

Oppo research

Opponents of the data sale, including state attorneys general, assert that such transfers treat genetic information as mere property rather than sensitive personal data. They argue this risks misuse, identity theft, and loss of consumer control. They are seeking explicit, informed consent requirements and more robust legal protections against inappropriate data sales.

Policy impact

The collective lawsuit could establish new precedents for how sensitive genetic and health information is handled during corporate bankruptcy or sale. Consumers may gain stronger rights over their personal data, and companies involved in collecting such information could face stricter legal requirements for consent and protection of user data in the future.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the lawsuit as a critical defense of deeply personal, immutable genetic data, emphasizing the moral imperative of protecting consumer privacy and highlighting practical steps like data deletion, coupled with concerns over limits in existing privacy laws and past data breaches.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right de-emphasize those emotional tones and focus more neutrally on the necessity of the lawsuit to safeguard privacy amid bankruptcy, portraying 23andMe as a "struggling firm" whose sale to Regeneron may still uphold privacy policies.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

72 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • 27 states and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit in bankruptcy court to block the sale of personal genetic data by 23andMe without customer consent.
  • Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield stated that personal genetic data is too sensitive to be sold without express, informed consent.
  • The lawsuit emphasizes that customers should control their deeply personal information, which cannot be sold like ordinary property.
  • A court-appointed consumer privacy ombudsman will examine the sale's impact on consumer privacy and report to the court.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Monday, a group consisting of 27 states along with the District of Columbia initiated legal action in bankruptcy court to prevent 23andMe from selling customers’ genetic information without their permission.
  • The lawsuit followed 23andMe's Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing on March 23 and its announced agreement with Regeneron Pharmaceuticals to sell the company.
  • 23andMe holds biological samples and sensitive genetic data from over 15 million users collected through at-home DNA tests, raising concerns about data privacy and misuse.
  • Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield highlighted that genetic data is highly personal, enduring, and sensitive, and stressed that such information should not be treated or traded as typical property without obtaining clear permission.
  • The legal challenge and consumer warnings to delete accounts highlight widespread concerns about protecting personal genetic information amid 23andMe's financial distress and sale process.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • 27 states and the District of Columbia filed a lawsuit to block 23andMe from selling personal genetic data without consent on Monday.
  • Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield stated that biological samples and medical records are too sensitive to sell without customer consent.
  • The lawsuit asserts that customers should control their personal information and not be treated like ordinary property.
  • A court-appointed consumer privacy ombudsman is set to report on the sale's impact on consumer privacy by Tuesday.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™