States sue Trump admin for secretly sharing Medicaid data with ICE, DHS


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Personal data lawsuit

A 20 state coalition is suing the Trump administration over the alleged illegal transfer of Medicaid recipients’ private health data to federal immigration agencies.

Reduction of care

The lawsuit argues that data sharing violates HIPAA and decades of federal privacy protections, potentially deterring people from seeking care.

Stop data transfers

The states are asking the federal court to block further data transfers and prevent use of any information already shared.


Full story

A coalition of 20 states is suing the Trump administration, accusing it of illegally sharing the private health records of Medicaid recipients with federal immigration authorities. The lawsuit, filed Tuesday, July 1, in U.S. District Court, alleges the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services quietly gave the Department of Homeland Security access to millions of individuals’ sensitive medical and immigration data without notice, consent or legal authority.

States say privacy laws were broken

The complaint argues the data transfer, made in June, violates federal law and decades of privacy protections. The attorneys general say that the move could deter vulnerable communities from seeking medical care and exacerbate public health outcomes.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Emails and a memo obtained by The Associated Press revealed that HHS instructed Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) staff to quickly turn over data, including immigration status, on millions of people enrolled in federal health programs. Reportedly, the DHS received the information. Sources say CMS staff had just 54 minutes to comply with the request.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta is leading a coalition of 19 other states, including New Jersey, Illinois, Colorado, Massachusetts, Arizona, Hawaii and New York. They claim HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. authorized Immigration and Customs Enforcement to access Medicaid data from states that provide coverage to noncitizens under federally supported health plans.

The lawsuit focuses on federal and state laws designed to protect people’s personal information, especially health data. One of the key laws is the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA, which sets strict rules for how medical information can be collected, stored and shared to protect patient privacy.

State attorneys general want a federal judge to stop HHS from sharing personal health data with immigration agencies like ICE and Homeland Security.

DHS says it has received the data to ensure Medicaid benefits are only provided to those who are legally eligible. However, the lawsuit argues that Congress has already extended emergency Medicaid to anyone living in the U.S., regardless of their immigration status.

“The Trump Administration has upended longstanding privacy protections with its decision to illegally share sensitive, personal health data with ICE,” Bonta said. “I’m sickened by this latest salvo in the President’s anti-immigrant campaign. We’re headed to court to prevent any further sharing of Medicaid data — and to ensure any of the data that’s already been shared is not used for immigration enforcement purposes.”

Hospitals are required under federal law to treat anyone in a life-threatening emergency. Some states, like California and New York, go beyond that, using their own funds to offer full coverage to migrants residing in the country illegally.

Federal rules give states flexibility

States that opt into Medicaid run their own programs within federal guidelines. They decide who qualifies and what is covered, but federal funding only applies to services permitted by law.

As of January 2025, more than 78 million Americans were enrolled in Medicaid or CHIP, which helps cover kids in families who earn too much for Medicaid but not enough for private insurance, according to California’s Attorney General’s Office.

In May, federal health officials announced plans to tighten Medicaid oversight, citing concerns that some states might be using federal dollars to cover care for people without legal status. CMS said the change follows an executive order from President Donald Trump aimed at stopping taxpayer-funded benefits from going to migrants residing in the U.S. illegally.

Alex Delia (Managing Editor), Lawrence Banton (Digital Producer), and Zachary Hill (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Why this story matters

This lawsuit is a clash between privacy rights and immigration enforcement, raising questions about how sensitive health data is handled and protected in regard to state and federal laws.

Privacy and data security

Numerous state attorneys general allege that the federal government's transfer of Medicaid data to the Department of Homeland Security violated established federal privacy protections, including HIPAA, highlighting ongoing debates over how sensitive health data is managed and shared.

Healthcare access and public health

According to state officials and the lawsuit, the data-sharing practice may deter eligible individuals from seeking necessary medical care, potentially exacerbating public health risks and putting greater strain on safety-net providers.

Immigration enforcement and legal boundaries

The reported use of personal health data to support immigration enforcement efforts brings into question the legal limitations on interagency data sharing and the broader implications for how public benefit programs interact with federal immigration priorities.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 106 media outlets

Behind the numbers

At the heart of the lawsuit is the transfer of Medicaid data for millions of enrollees. According to sources, over 78 million Americans are covered by Medicaid and CHIP programs. California alone has 2 million non-citizens covered by state-funded Medicaid programs, and the federal government argues that data review is necessary to prevent misuse of public funds.

Context corner

Historically, Medicaid data has been confidential and used solely for healthcare administration and eligibility verification. The complaint asserts that for decades, federal policy separated health and immigration data to build trust and ensure public health goals. Recent policy changes, opponents argue, reverse these protections, raising concerns about broader uses of sensitive data in government oversight and enforcement.

History lesson

Since Medicaid’s inception in 1965, personal health data has been protected under federal law, including HIPAA. Historically, such data was shielded from law enforcement use except in limited circumstances, supporting public health efforts. Any deviation from this longstanding separation between health and enforcement data represents a significant policy departure, opponents argue.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frames the Medicaid data sharing primarily as a privacy violation weaponizing personal health information against immigrant communities, emphasizing terms like “deportation officials” and a “chilling effect” that threatens vulnerable populations’ access to care.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right stress oversight and fraud prevention, depicting the lawsuits as politically motivated “lawfare” by “far-left” states aiming to shield undocumented immigrants, using language that connotes accountability and legality, such as “protecting taxpayer dollars” and describing the data transfer as “lawful.”

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

106 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Colorado, alongside 19 other states led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, is suing the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to block the transfer of Medicaid data to immigration officials, claiming it violates the law.
  • The lawsuit argues that the data release creates fear among noncitizens, possibly deterring them from enrolling in Medicaid, which could impact healthcare access.
  • U.S. Health and Human Services spokesperson Andrew Nixon defended the legality of the data sharing, stating it was to verify Medicaid eligibility and protect taxpayer dollars.
  • California Attorney General Rob Bonta emphasized that this action undermines privacy protections and could prevent individuals from seeking necessary emergency health care.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Tuesday, Washington and 19 other states filed a lawsuit in California against HHS for sharing Medicaid data with DHS, including ICE, without notifying states.
  • The lawsuit challenges the June 13 data transfer that enabled the federal government to access sensitive Medicaid information for immigration enforcement, which plaintiffs say violates federal law.
  • The information transferred encompassed personal details such as individuals' full names, residential locations, Social Security identifiers, immigration information, and medical claim records for millions of Medicaid participants across several states.
  • Washington Attorney General Nick Brown emphasized that Medicaid information has long been safeguarded under confidentiality rules and called on the court to prevent any additional sharing of this data for immigration enforcement activities.
  • The lawsuit argues the data sharing may cause immigrants to avoid healthcare, worsen health outcomes, and break trust, especially in immigrant and mixed-status families targeted by the administration.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A coalition of 20 states, led by California, is suing the Trump administration for unlawfully sharing Medicaid data with federal immigration officials.
  • The lawsuit claims that Health and Human Services violated multiple federal privacy laws by transferring personal data on millions of enrollees to the Department of Homeland Security without consent.
  • Plaintiffs allege this data sharing jeopardizes public health, raises costs for states, and undermines trust in healthcare services for immigrants.
  • Health and Human Services maintains the action was legal, asserting it intended to protect Medicaid benefits for individuals entitled to receive them.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™