Supreme Court asked to overturn gay marriage ruling


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Supreme Court petition

Kim Davis, a former Kentucky county clerk, has appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider its Obergefell v. Hodges decision, which granted equal marriage rights to gay Americans.

Religious freedom claims

Davis asserts that her religious beliefs prevented her from issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

Legal expert perspectives

Lower courts have dismissed Davis' claims and most legal experts do not believe the Supreme Court will take her case.


Full story

The U.S. Supreme Court could overturn its decision that gave equal marriage rights to gay Americans. An appeal of a high-profile case has asked the justices to reconsider their decision.

Appeal to the Supreme Court

Kim Davis, a former Kentucky county clerk, spent six days in jail in 2015 after refusing to issue marriage licenses to gay couples on religious grounds.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

She’s now appealing the verdict, which cost her more than $350,000.

Her petition argues she’s protected by the First Amendment and the decision to extend marriage rights to same-sex couples in the Obergefell v. Hodges decision was “egregiously wrong” and “deeply damaging.”

“Obergefell was not grounded in the Nation’s history or traditions, nor could it have been because it was not rooted in any Nation’s history or traditions,” the petition reads.

They argue the Constitution makes no reference to same-sex marriage.

Davis’ claims of religious devotion were called into doubt when it came to light that she had been divorced three times despite Biblical objections. Davis said in a statement that the separations occurred before she found religion. “I am not perfect,” she said in a statement to CNN in 2015. “No one is. But I am forgiven.”

She said her deep religious beliefs prevented her from issuing the licenses, and it’s believed she’s one of only a few Americans with the legal precedent to bring this case to the Supreme Court.

Lower courts have already dismissed Davis’ claims, and most legal experts don’t believe the high court will take her case.

“Not a single judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals showed any interest in Davis’s rehearing petition, and we are confident the Supreme Court will likewise agree that Davis’s arguments do not merit further attention,” William Powell, attorney for the now-married couple that sued Davis, told ABC News.

Roe v. Wade

Davis’ petition said the issue of gay marriage should be treated like the issue of abortion. The lawyer cited the Dobbs decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade.

“As with abortion in Dobbs, ‘[b]ecause the Due Process Clause does not secure any substantive rights, it does not secure a right to [samesex marriage],’ id., and especially not a right to receive a same-sex marriage license from a specific government official, regardless of that individual’s religious convictions,” the petition reads.

Conservative Justice Clarence Thomas is also cited in the petition and has shown interest in revisiting the Obergefell decision.

Trump on gay marriage

The White House has not commented on the case.

President Donald Trump has had varied stances on gay marriage over the years. Most recently, press secretary Karoline Leavitt told NBC News rolling back same-sex marriage was not a campaign promise from Trump.

The president has targeted the transgender community with several executive orders, including barring transgender athletes from competing in women’s sports and banning transgender people from the military.

Tags: ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don't just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A Supreme Court appeal challenges the 2015 decision legalizing same-sex marriage, raising questions about constitutional rights, religious freedom and the future of marriage equality in the United States.

Marriage equality

The outcome could affect the legality and recognition of same-sex marriage across the country, impacting the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals to marry.

Religious freedom

Kim Davis argues her First Amendment rights protect her refusal to issue marriage licenses, highlighting ongoing tensions between religious beliefs and public duties.

Precedent and constitutional interpretation

The appeal draws from parallels with the Dobbs decision and ongoing debates about the role of precedent, particularly concerning social issues not explicitly addressed in the Constitution.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 98 media outlets

Do the math

There are about 823,000 married same-sex couples in the U.S., nearly 600,000 of whom wed after 2015. Davis was ordered to pay $100,000 in emotional damages and $260,000 in attorneys' fees.

History lesson

Prior to Obergefell, marriage laws were determined by individual states with 35 states prohibiting same-sex marriage by statute or constitution. Previous attempts to challenge Obergefell have been denied by the Supreme Court.

Policy impact

If Obergefell were overturned, it would likely not affect existing marriages but could allow many states to ban new same-sex marriages, resulting in a patchwork of marriage laws affecting LGBTQ+ couples' rights across the U.S.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don't just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left portray Kim Davis’ Supreme Court petition as a “dangerous” and “discriminatory” attack on marriage equality, using emotionally charged language like “upend” and “terrifying” to frame conservative efforts as hostile threats to LGBTQ+ rights.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right emphasize “religious liberty” and constitutional First Amendment protections, describing the Obergefell ruling as “egregiously wrong” and a “legal fiction” and portraying Davis as a victim fighting government overreach.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

98 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Kim Davis, the former Kentucky county clerk, is appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn its 2015 decision on same-sex marriage, claiming protection under the First Amendment.
  • Davis seeks to reverse a $100,000 jury verdict and $260,000 in attorney fees while arguing her denial of licenses was based on religious freedom, with support from Liberty Counsel.
  • The Supreme Court will decide this fall whether to hear Davis' appeal, which could threaten federal protections for same-sex marriage and revert authority to individual states.
  • As of 2024, approximately 69% of Americans support same-sex marriage, yet some conservative groups and states are pushing against the ruling.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • The U.S. Supreme Court faces a decision in the coming months on Kim Davis’ petition urging reversal of Obergefell v. Hodges.
  • Davis argues her actions are protected by the First Amendment’s free exercise clause and that Obergefell v. Hodges was "egregiously wrong."
  • Lower courts have rejected Davis’ defense, and attorneys for David Ermold and David Moore said they are confident the Supreme Court will decline review.
  • If granted review, oral arguments could take place next spring with a decision by June 2026 –– existing marriages remain valid under the 2022 Respect for Marriage Act.
  • Amid efforts in at least nine states to restrict LGBTQ+ marriage rights, the Court's decision could shift the issue back to the states.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The Supreme Court may hear a case that could overturn the nationwide right to same-sex marriage after Kim Davis requested a review of the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling.
  • Davis, a former Kentucky county clerk, was jailed for six days in 2015 for refusing to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple due to her religious beliefs.
  • Davis claims that her First Amendment rights were violated and argues that the Obergefell decision was "egregiously wrong" and should be reversed.
  • Several lawmakers have supported Davis' petition, arguing that the issue of marriage should be left to the states, while her attorney claims Obergefell threatens religious liberty.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™