Supreme Court lets Trump administration block passport sex markers


Summary

Supreme Court decision

The Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to restrict passport gender markers to only male or female, halting a lower court's order.

Reasoning for ruling

The Supreme Court's unsigned order stated that displaying a passport holder's sex at birth "no more offends equal protection principles than displaying their country of birth."

Policy background

President Donald Trump issued an executive order restricting official recognition to only two sexes, male and female, determined by birth certificates and "biological classification."


Full story

The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed the Trump administration to block transgender and nonbinary people from choosing any sex other than male or female on their passports. The ruling comes as a lawsuit over the administration’s ban plays out in court. 

The decision halts a lower-court ruling that required the government to continue allowing people to select male, female or X on their passports to reflect their gender identity on new or renewed passports.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

What did the justices say?

The court said President Donald Trump’s policy, implemented through an executive order earlier this year, doesn’t seem to discriminate against transgender people.

“Displaying passport holders’ sex at birth no more offends equal protection principles than displaying their country of birth,” the unsigned order said.

The order said that the government was just stating a “historical fact” and not subjecting anyone to biased treatment. 

The Supreme Court’s three liberal justices dissented, saying passports listing only a gender at birth make transgender people vulnerable to violence, harassment and discrimination. 

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson noted that Trump’s executive order called transgender identity “false” and “corrosive.” 

Trump also declared that the U.S. would recognize only two sexes: male and female. This would be decided by birth certificates and “biological classification.”

What is the case’s history?

In June, a judge blocked Trump’s executive order on passports after a group of nonbinary and transgender people sued the government. Some in that group said they were afraid to submit applications.

An appeals court later left that judge’s order in place. But in an appeal to the Supreme Court, Solicitor General D. John Sauer pointed to a previous ruling on minors receiving gender transitioning health care and argued that Congress gave the president power over passports. Sauer said that power overlapped with the president’s authority over foreign affairs. 

The court took more than a month to reach its decision, the longest for any emergency case from Trump’s second term, according to CNN.

Alan Judd (Content Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The Supreme Court ruling on passport sex designation policies affects federal recognition of transgender and nonbinary identities and shapes the ongoing legal and policy debate on rights for transgender people in the United States.

Legal authority

The case centers on the scope of presidential power over passports and immigration, with the Supreme Court weighing in on the president’s authority to determine passport policies and recognition criteria.

Transgender rights

The decision influences how the federal government recognizes transgender and nonbinary individuals, directly impacting their ability to obtain documentation that reflects their gender identity.

Equal protection

Debate over whether limiting passport sex options constitutes discrimination raises broader questions about equal protection under the law and the rights of marginalized groups.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 109 media outlets

Community reaction

According to several sources, LGBTQ advocacy groups, civil rights organizations and affected individuals describe the decision as harmful and distressing, expressing concerns about increased risks of harassment, violence and difficulties in travel and identification.

History lesson

Historically, US passports required only male or female sex identification until policies began changing in the 1990s, with more inclusive measures in 2021. The current policy reverts to earlier, less flexible definitions.

Policy impact

The new policy eliminates self-selection of gender markers on passports, impacting transgender and nonbinary individuals who may be forced to use documents that do not reflect their identity, which can result in misidentification or safety concerns.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the Supreme Court's passport decision as "targeting transgender people" and a "discriminatory policy," highlighting its "blow" to rights.
  • Media outlets in the center while noting a "setback for LGBTQ rights" and a "crackdown," maintain a more measured tone.
  • Media outlets on the right celebrate the ruling, using terms like "Smacks Down" and emphasizing "biological sex" or "birth sex" as "immutable characteristics," asserting the government is "merely attesting to a historical fact.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

228 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The Supreme Court has allowed President Donald Trump's administration to enforce a policy preventing transgender and nonbinary individuals from selecting passport sex markers that correspond with their gender identity, effective immediately.
  • This ruling stops a lower court's order that permitted applicants to choose male or female options for passports, limiting them based on their birth certificates.
  • Three dissenting justices expressed concerns over the imminent harm the new policy may cause to transgender individuals during ongoing litigation.
  • The Trump administration claims that requiring applicants to display their biological sex is consistent with historical practices and does not violate equal protection principles.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to enforce rules requiring U.S. passports to display biological sex at birth, blocking transgender and nonbinary people from choosing gender-aligned markers.
  • President Donald Trump ordered on Jan. 20 that government IDs, including passports, reflect sex assigned at birth, prompting the State Department to change passport rules accordingly.
  • Since 1992, the State Department allowed sex marker changes with doctor certification, and President Joe Biden added the "X" gender marker in 2021; plaintiffs argue limiting markers to birth sex causes harassment and harms travel safety.
  • By a 6-3 vote, justices allowed the Trump administration to enforce its passport policy while litigation continues in lower courts, removing the "X" gender marker and putting injunctions on hold.
  • Jon Davidson warned, `'Forcing transgender people to carry passports that out them against their will increases the risk that they will face harassment and violence and adds to the considerable barriers they already face in securing freedom, safety, and acceptance. We will continue to fight this policy and work for a future where no one is denied self-determination over their identity,' Davidson said.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The Supreme Court allowed Donald Trump's administration to enforce a policy blocking transgender and nonbinary individuals from choosing passport sex markers according to their gender identity, while a lawsuit continues.
  • This ruling overturns a lower-court order that permitted individuals to select male, female, or X markers on passports.
  • The court stated that displaying sex at birth does not violate equal protection principles, claiming it only attests to a historical fact.
  • The dissenting justices argued that the policy exposes transgender individuals to increased risks of violence, harassment, and discrimination.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.