Supreme Court rejects revisiting decision legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide


Summary

Supreme Court decision

The Supreme Court stated it will not reconsider its 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.

Obergefell v. Hodges

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of nationwide recognition of same-sex marriage, determining that the right to marry is protected under the Fourteenth Amendment's due process and equal protection clauses.

Kim Davis's actions

Kim Davis, then a Kentucky county clerk, refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples after the Supreme Court's 2015 decision, citing her religious beliefs.


Full story

The Supreme Court said it will not revisit its ruling that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide. The case was brought by Kim Davis, a former Kentucky court clerk who refused to issue a marriage license to same-sex couples after the court’s 2015 decision. 

The court turned away Davis’ appeal to overturn a lower-court decision ordering her to pay $360,000 in damages and attorney’s fees to a couple denied a marriage license. Davis said she refused to issue same-sex marriage licenses because of her religious beliefs. 

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

What was the 2015 decision? 

In June 2015, the court ruled 5-4 in favor of nationwide recognition of same-sex marriage in Obergefell v. Hodges. Chief Justice John Roberts, along with current Justices Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito, dissented from the majority opinion.

Since the decision, Thomas has called for erasing the ruling. Alito has criticized the decision but recently said he was not advocating its reversal. Roberts hasn’t spoken on the subject since he wrote his dissenting opinion. 

Justices Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan voted in favor.

The decision held that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. Before the decision, 36 states and Washington, D.C. had legalized same-sex marriage. 

Since the 2015 decision, nearly 600,000 same-sex couples have gotten married, according to the Williams Institute

After the Supreme Court released its decision, 14 counties in three southern states continued to deny marriage licenses to same-sex couples. One of those counties was in Kentucky, where Davis worked.

She contacted the governor’s office, requesting an executive order to protect clerks who oppose the ruling. Kentucky law requires county clerks to issue marriage licenses in their name. Davis then began turning away same-sex couples before denying marriage licenses to all couples. 

A judge held Davis in contempt of court after she failed to comply with court orders saying she must issue marriage licenses to all qualified couples, including same-sex couples. The judge jailed Davis for eight days but released her after her staff began issuing licenses on her behalf without her name on the form. Kentucky state lawmakers later enacted a law that removed the names of all county clerks from state marriage licenses. 

Davis later ran an unsuccessful bid for reelection as county clerk in 2018.

Tags: ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The Supreme Court's decision to uphold its 2015 same-sex marriage ruling reinforces existing marriage rights while clarifying how lower courts address conflicts involving religious objections by public officials.

Same-sex marriage rights

The ongoing affirmation of marriage rights for same-sex couples underscores the lasting legal authority of the 2015 Supreme Court decision and its impact on hundreds of thousands of couples.

Religious objections in public service

The case highlights ongoing legal and ethical questions surrounding the responsibilities of public officials whose personal religious beliefs may conflict with their official duties.

Supreme Court precedent

The refusal to revisit its prior decision demonstrates the weight of Supreme Court precedent and its role in guiding lower courts and public officials on constitutional issues.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 78 media outlets

Context corner

Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015 established same-sex marriage as a constitutional right. The Kim Davis case became prominent when she, as a county clerk, refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples due to religious objections.

Do the math

Kim Davis was ordered to pay $100,000 in damages to the couple and $260,000 for their attorneys’ fees and expenses. News reports state the total is $360,000. The population of married same-sex couples has doubled since 2015.

Policy impact

The outcome maintains marriage equality across the U.S., ensuring same-sex couples retain the right to marry and access associated legal protections. Rulings reinforce that government officials must carry out constitutional rights regardless of personal beliefs.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Sources

  1. USA Today

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the Supreme Court's decision as upholding a "landmark" achievement, using terms like "legalizing" and "long-shot effort" to convey relief and dismiss the challenge, often highlighting "feared the conservative court" and the $360,000 damages Kim Davis faced.
  • Media outlets in the center maintain neutrality with phrases like "rejects bid," uniquely providing broader context on the court's conservative majority and previous abortion rights reversal.
  • Media outlets on the right de-emphasize these fears and the specific damage amount, instead focusing on Davis's "bid" to overturn the ruling, implicitly acknowledging the conservative challenge.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

283 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The Supreme Court rejected an appeal from Kim Davis to overturn its decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
  • The Supreme Court rejected a call to overturn its decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide on Monday.
  • Justice Clarence Thomas is the only justice who has called for erasing the same-sex marriage ruling from 2015.
  • Justice Amy Coney Barrett suggested that same-sex marriage may be treated differently than abortion because people have relied on the decision.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • The Supreme Court rejected a petition seeking to overturn their 2015 ruling that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
  • The case was brought by former Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis, who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
  • While some conservative justices have criticized the 2015 decision, the court declined to revisit the precedent legalizing same-sex marriage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The Supreme Court rejected a case on Monday to overturn its 2015 same-sex marriage ruling.
  • Kim Davis argued for a private First Amendment religious defense after she was found to have violated a judge's order regarding same-sex marriage licenses.
  • David Ermold and David Moore sued Davis after she denied them a marriage license, leading to a jury awarding them $360,000 in damages.
  • The couple's attorneys claimed Davis waived her right to challenge the ruling earlier in the litigation, stating the Supreme Court should uphold this representation.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Sources

  1. USA Today

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.