Taylor Swift buys back music catalog after years-long industry battle


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Music ownership

Taylor Swift now owns the master recordings of her first six albums, which were sold in 2019 when her record label contract expired. Swift described the moment as highly emotional.

Re-recordings strategy

Swift’s re-recorded albums, labeled as "Taylor’s Version," were produced to regain control over her music after her original recordings were sold by Big Machine Records.

Industry impact

Swift's efforts have influenced other artists, including John Fogerty, who is re-recording his Creedence Clearwater Revival classics and referencing Swift's approach.


Full story

It’s not a love story, it’s a victory anthem! After years of public battles and strategic re-recordings, Taylor Swift now owns the original master recordings for her first six albums.

Why didn’t Swift own her music?

In 2019, Swift’s former label, Big Machine Records, sold her catalog to music executive Scooter Braun. At just 15 years old, Swift signed a standard industry contract that gave the label ownership of her masters in exchange for production, promotion and distribution support.

Owning master recordings means controlling how, when and where music is used — and collecting the majority of profits from those uses. Until now, Swift never had that control.

Swift broke the news in an Instagram post, encouraging fans to read the full statement on her website.

“I’ve been bursting into tears of joy at random intervals ever since I found out that this is really happening,” Swift wrote. “I really get to say these words: All of the music I’ve ever made… now belongs… to me. And all my music videos. All the concert films. The album art and photography. The unreleased songs.”

The meaning behind ‘Taylor’s Version’

Albums like “Red” and “1989” were re-released with “Taylor’s Version” added to the title because of this ownership issue. Swift re-recorded those early albums to override the originals with new masters she could control.

No help from Scooter Braun

A source told People that Braun had no involvement in the purchase. Braun sold Swift’s masters to Shamrock Holdings in 2019 for $300 million. Swift said she purchased the masters from Shamrock.

“Taylor now owns all of her music, and this moment finally happened in spite of Scooter Braun, not because of him,” the source said.

No official purchase price has been confirmed. According to Rolling Stone, the rumored $600 million price tag is inaccurate.

What about RepTV?

Fans had hoped for a re-record of the “Reputation” album, which was her final release under Big Machine. But in her letter, Swift shared that she had only just begun that process.

She said the album is tied to a specific moment in her life and doesn’t feel it can be improved by redoing it.

The cost of creative control in the industry

Braun previously represented other artists like Justin Bieber and Ariana Grande. However, Braun and Bieber recently had a falling-out over Bieber’s current financial crisis.

In 2022, Bieber canceled his “Justice World Tour” after doctors diagnosed him with Ramsay Hunt syndrome, a condition triggered by a shingles outbreak that affects facial nerves near the ear. Part of Bieber’s face was left paralyzed as a result. He had already received a $40 million advance from concert promoter AEG.

Braun’s company, Hybe, reportedly covered the debt, with an agreement that Bieber would pay it back over 10 years. However, according to TMZ, documents obtained from an independent PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) audit show Bieber stopped paying and still owes over $8.8 million.

John Fogerty gets inspired by ‘Taylor’s Version’

In a separate music update, legendary artist John Fogerty is re-recording 20 of his “Creedence Clearwater Revival” classics. According to Rolling Stone, he says, “I wanted to call it ‘Taylor’s Version.’”

His new LP, “Legacy: The Creedence Clearwater Revival Years,” will be released August 22 and will include fresh takes on his best-known songs.

A billion-dollar tour and a legacy reclaimed

Taylor Swift’s recent achievements underscore her influence in the music industry. 

Swift’s “Eras Tour,” which ran from March 2023 through December 2024, had 149 shows across five continents and grossed over $2 billion. It marked the highest-grossing concert tour in history. 

“1989 (Taylor’s Version)” sold 1.653 million equivalent album units, outselling the original version’s first week numbers by 28%, according to Fortune

Variety reports “Red (Taylor’s Version)” broke two Spotify records at the time of its 2021 release — most-streamed album in a day by a female and most-streamed female in a single day.

According to Billboard, in July 2023, “Fearless (Taylor’s Version)” earned 1.47 billion on-demand streams, which didn’t include user-generated content, as compared to the 680.39 million streams for the original “Fearless” since the re-recording was released. 

In 2023, “Speak Now (Taylor’s Version)” broke the record for the most No. 1 albums among women, surpassing Barbra Streisand.

In her letter to fans, Swift didn’t just celebrate a business victory. She also reflected on the emotional toll that drove her fight for ownership of her masters. She also expresses gratitude to her fans.

“The passionate support you showed [the re-recordings] and the success story you turned ‘The Eras Tour’ into is why I was able to buy back my music,” Swift wrote.

Joey Nunez (Video Editor), Alex Delia (Deputy Managing Editor), and Lawrence Banton (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , ,

Why this story matters

Taylor Swift's acquisition of her original master recordings highlights issues of artist rights and control in the music industry, setting a precedent for creative ownership and possibly inspiring other musicians to pursue similar actions.

Artist ownership

Swift's recovery of her masters brings attention to the importance of artists, having control over their own creations and financial futures.

Music industry contracts

The story exposes how standard industry contracts often leave young artists without ownership of their work and can shape the trajectory of their careers and rights.

Inspiration and impact

Swift's actions have motivated both fans and other artists, such as Creedence Clearwater Revival singer John Fogerty, to take steps toward reclaiming their own musical legacies.

Get the big picture

Behind the numbers

Most reports cite that Shamrock Capital bought Taylor Swift's catalog for an estimated $300-360 million, a figure described as close to what Swift paid to reacquire the rights. Several sources, including Billboard, state that rumors of a $600 million to $1 billion purchase price are inaccurate, emphasizing that the transaction’s actual sum is considerably lower.

Community reaction

Communities of Swift’s fans enthusiastically celebrated the news, seeing Swift’s action as a victory for artists’ rights. The supportive reaction extends to fellow musicians, some of whom have stated that Swift’s efforts have emboldened them to seek or negotiate better control over their own work.

Context corner

Ownership of master recordings is a longstanding point of contention in the music industry. Artists commonly sign contracts early in their careers relinquishing master rights to labels in exchange for promotion and support. Swift’s high-profile negotiations and public disputes have brought widespread awareness to an otherwise industry-specific issue.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame Taylor Swift’s acquisition of her masters as a poetic justice and emotional victory for artist empowerment, emphasizing the moral struggle against corporate control and celebrating her cultural re-recordings as fan-driven triumphs.
  • Media outlets in the center maintain neutral, factual tones focused on industry context and Swift’s tour-funded financing, de-emphasizing emotional or adversarial angles.
  • Media outlets on the right highlight the financial magnitude — citing the rumored $360 million buyback — and underscores Swift’s individual grit amid a hostile history with Scooter Braun, portraying him as a bullying antagonist and framing the deal as a savvy business maneuver.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

251 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Taylor Swift has regained control over her entire music catalog by purchasing it back from Shamrock Capital, who had acquired it from Scooter Braun.
  • Swift said, "All of the music I’ve ever made now belongs to me," expressing gratitude toward her fans and Shamrock Capital.
  • The sale includes rights to Swift's videos, concert films and unreleased songs, marking a significant moment for artistic ownership.
  • Swift rerecorded four of her first six albums as part of her effort to regain ownership, with each release being a commercial success.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • Taylor Swift completed the buyback of her entire music catalog, including masters previously held by Shamrock Capital, by May 30, 2025.
  • This buyback followed a long dispute beginning in 2019 after her former label sold her master recordings to Scooter Braun and Shamrock Capital without offering her a purchase option.
  • During the dispute, Swift re-recorded and released four albums as "Taylor's Version" to regain control over her work and affirm artist rights.
  • She thanked fans for their support in a letter, saying, "all of the music I've ever made now belongs to me," and described the deal as "honest, fair, and respectful."
  • Owning her full catalog grants Swift complete autonomy over her music and related content, signaling a notable example in artist ownership debates.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Taylor Swift has bought back the rights to her first six albums from Shamrock Capital, six years after they were sold to Scooter Braun's Ithaca Holdings.
  • Swift expressed joy and gratitude, stating, "I really get to say these words: All of the music I've ever made…now belongs…to me."

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™