Texas National Guard troops arrive in Illinois


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Troops arrive in Illinois

Texas National Guard troops arrived in Illinois on Tuesday after President Trump ordered troops to Chicago.

Troop deployment legality

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson have strongly opposed the deployment of Texas National Guard troops to Illinois. They describe the action as "illegal and dangerous" and have filed a lawsuit alleging that the deployment is unconstitutional and violates state sovereignty.

Duration and logistics

There is currently no announced timeline for how long the Texas National Guard troops will remain in Illinois. Defense contractors are reportedly preparing housing and dining facilities for at least 250 soldiers as part of the effort.


Full story

The Texas National Guard has arrived in Illinois despite strong opposition from state and city leaders who call the deployment illegal and dangerous. Aerial video shows troops at the U.S. Army reserve center in Elwood, about fifty miles southwest of Chicago.

The troops are part of a federal immigration enforcement mission that President Donald Trump ordered. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott also showed his support, calling the troops his state’s “elite national guard.”

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker said he has had no contact from the administration or the guard about their arrival, calling the move chaotic and dangerous

Abbott replied to Pritzker’s comments, stating that he had fully authorized the president to call up 400 Texas National Guard members.

Trump defended the deployment, saying he’s using his lawful authority to protect federal officers and assets.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Attorney General Pam Bondi also supported the deployments during a Senate Committee oversight hearing on Tuesday. She said cities need the National Guard to “protect the national buildings.”

The comment came after Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., asked if the deployments were “best practice.”

“I’m having a real struggle right now with the National Guard being deployed and masking the abject failure of leaders in the state and local level,” Tillis said. “Are we masking an underlying problem that will come back the minute that we leave?”

So far, there’s no timeline for how long the troops will remain in Illinois. However, defense contractors said they’re preparing housing and dining facilities for at least 250 soldiers.

Illinois lawsuit

The troops boarded a plane to Chicago as Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson held a press conference asking troops to stay out of Illinois.

“Illinois will not let the Trump administration continue on their authoritarian march without resisting,” Pritzker said. “We will use every lever at our disposal to stop this power grab because military troops should not be used against American communities.”

On Monday, the two filed a lawsuit to block the deployment, calling it unconstitutional and a violation of state sovereignty. Trump, Attorney General Pam Bondi and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth are all listed as defendants.

“The American people, regardless of where they reside, should not live under the threat of occupation by the United States military, particularly not simply because their city or state leadership has fallen out of a president’s favor,” the lawsuit read in part.

In response to the lawsuit, a White House spokesperson said, “President Trump will not turn a blind eye to the lawlessness plaguing American cities.”

Their case is scheduled for tomorrow.

Similar lawsuit in Oregon

A similar lawsuit was filed in Oregon when Trump ordered troops to Portland. Over the weekend, a federal judge blocked that deployment, accusing the White House of circumventing federal law and violating the Constitution by using the military when no significant threat or insurrection existed.

The judge’s temporary order remains in effect until Oct. 18 as the Trump administration appeals the case.

Jason K. Morrell (Morning Managing Editor), Emma Stoltzfus (Video Editor), and Devan Markham (Morning Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The arrival of Texas National Guard troops in Illinois, despite legal and political opposition, highlights significant questions about federal authority, state sovereignty and the use of the military in domestic affairs amid ongoing disputes over immigration enforcement and public safety.

Federal versus state authority

The deployment has sparked legal and political battles over the extent of federal power to order military actions within states that object, raising constitutional issues surrounding states' rights and governmental checks and balances.

Use of military in domestic affairs

Sending National Guard troops into major American cities for missions related to law enforcement and immigration enforcement generates debate about the military's proper role within U.S. borders and the historical separation between the military and domestic policing.

Immigration enforcement and protest response

The deployment is closely tied to federal immigration operations, with sources reporting clashes and protests, illustrating the controversy and community resistance that can arise when immigration policies are implemented through enhanced law enforcement tactics.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 266 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Police and media sources widely report that homicide rates in Chicago have fallen, with recent statistics showing a year-over-year decrease of around 28-33 percent. This suggests a disconnect between claims of increasing violence and official crime data.

Context corner

Historically, the National Guard is typically under state control and deployed in response to emergencies or disasters. The federalization of Guard units over the objections of state governors is a rare and highly contested action in U.S. governance.

Policy impact

Legal action and new executive orders—such as Chicago’s ban on allowing federal agents to use city-owned property for operations—increase tensions between federal and local governance and impact how law enforcement interacts with immigrant communities.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the Texas National Guard's deployment of up to 400 troops as a punitive "Trump crackdown" and "invasion," emphasizing political overreach against Democratic cities and highlighting declining crime rates, like a 33% homicide drop in Chicago, to portray it as unnecessary escalation amid lawsuits and 49% public opposition.
  • Media outlets in the center neutrally detail the 200-troop, 60-day mobilization and judge's temporary allowance without partisan tones.
  • Media outlets on the right present it as a vital "federal protection mission" in a "war zone," focusing on violent incidents against agents, such as vehicle attacks, and deriding "lefty officials'" ICE-free zones as "SICK" for aiding criminals.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

266 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • National Guard troops from Texas arrived in Illinois for a planned deployment to Chicago, despite strong opposition from local officials, including Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson and Illinois Governor JB Pritzker.
  • The exact mission of the troops is unclear, but President Donald Trump has characterized Chicago as crime-ridden, despite local crime statistics showing reductions in incidents like homicides.
  • Illinois and Chicago have filed lawsuits against the Trump administration to block the deployment, which officials call unconstitutional and illegal.
  • Democratic leaders have vowed to resist the deployment, arguing that the use of the National Guard against local wishes sets a dangerous precedent.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Members of the Texas National Guard have arrived in Illinois to support federal immigration enforcement after being deployed by President Donald Trump, despite opposition from local officials including Illinois Governor JB Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson.
  • Illinois Governor JB Pritzker filed a lawsuit against Trump, claiming the deployment is unlawful and violates state sovereignty, while asserting that the troops should not be in Illinois.
  • Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson condemned the deployment as illegal and unconstitutional, stating it aims to suppress dissent against federal immigration policies.
  • Trump defended the deployment, claiming that it is necessary to restore order, while critics label it as politically motivated and unlawful.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.