Texts from Fox News hosts surface in Smartmatic defamation case


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Smartmatic's claims

Smartmatic’s $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News details internal texts and documents that it says show the network amplified false election claims, despite knowing they were inaccurate.

Text messages

The filing cites messages from Fox hosts and executives, including a directive to emphasize fraud coverage as ratings slipped after the 2020 election.

Fox's response

Fox News denied wrongdoing by pointing to Smartmatic’s legal troubles abroad and arguing its network's reporting was protected under the First Amendment.


Full story

Voting technology company Smartmatic filed a motion for summary judgment on Tuesday in New York’s Supreme Court, laying out its $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News. Smartmatic’s latest filing includes text messages from Fox News hosts, which the company argues illustrate how the network handled election fraud claims after 2020.

Smartmatic claims the network knowingly broadcast false claims that it rigged the 2020 election in favor of former President Joe Biden, damaging its reputation and business in the United States.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Claims of amplified falsehoods

Smartmatic said Fox News amplified unsubstantiated fraud allegations by repeatedly hosting Trump allies, including Trump attorneys Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell, who claimed Smartmatic software altered votes.

According to the court filing, Bret Baier, anchor of “Special Report,” raised concerns about misinformation being aired on the network. 

In a November 2020 text to Fox News Media president Jay Wallace, Baier wrote, “None of that is true as far as we can tell,” referring to fraud allegations. He added: “We need to fact-check this crap.”

According to the filing, Fox’s own research division, known as the “Brainroom,” had told producers that Smartmatic’s role in the 2020 election was limited to Los Angeles County and not tied to Dominion Voting Systems — something Smartmatic said was a key claim made on air.

The filing also included messages from Fox hosts. Jeanine Pirro texted then-Republican National Committee chair Ronna McDaniel, “I work so hard for the party across the country.”

“I’m the # 1 watched show on all news cable all weekend. I work so hard for the President and party,” Pirro texted McDaniel in September 2020, according to Smartmatic’s motion.

Pirro left Fox in May to become U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia.

Ratings pressure and Murdoch involvement

Smartmatic’s motion alleged that Fox executives responded to ratings declines after Biden was declared the winner of the 2020 election by leaning into fraud narratives. 

Rupert Murdoch and his son Lachlan were cited in the filing as urging executives to address audience losses.

“The conclusion reached based on performance analytics: give the audience more election fraud,” Smartmatic stated.

A text from Fox host Jesse Watters to Greg Gutfeld said: “Think about how incredible our ratings would be if Fox went ALL in on STOP THE STEAL.”

Fox denies wrongdoing, arguing its coverage was protected under the First Amendment and that Smartmatic’s financial struggles stem from separate controversies.

Network attorneys highlighted federal indictments against Smartmatic executives accused of bribing officials in the Philippines to secure contracts in 2016.

“Smartmatic’s business and reputation were badly suffering long before any claims by President Trump’s lawyers on Fox News,” a network spokesperson said. “Smartmatic grossly inflated its damage claims to generate headlines and chill free speech. Now, in the aftermath of Smartmatic’s executives getting indicted for bribery charges, we are eager and ready to continue defending our press freedoms.”

Fox News requested sanctions against Smartmatic for allegedly deleting mobile messages that could undermine its defamation case. Smartmatic’s founder Antonio Mugica is accused of ordering the deletion of critical WhatsApp messages just before filing their lawsuit in 2021.

Smartmatic rejects Fox’s argument

Smartmatic said Fox’s arguments are an attempt to shift focus.

“Fox lies, and when caught, they lie again to distract,” a company spokesperson said in a statement. “Fox’s latest filing is just another attempt to divert attention from its long-standing campaign of falsehoods and defamation.”

More context

The case follows Fox’s $787.5 million settlement with Dominion Voting Systems in 2023 over similar election fraud claims.

Smartmatic also alleged in its motion that Fox dismissed political analyst Chris Stirewalt and senior Washington executive Bill Sammon after the network’s early call of Arizona for Biden. The company said Murdoch approved the decision to appease viewers upset by the projection. Fox at the time described the departures as a reorganization and retirement.

The motion cited a communication from Dana Perino, co-host of Fox News show “The Five,” describing a phone call with Stirewalt after his dismissal.

“I explained to him — you were right, you didn’t cave, and you got fired for doing the right thing,” Perino said.

In a November 2020 exchange with producer Megan Albano, Watters described “an audience uprising vs. Fox like I’ve never seen” after the network’s decision to call Arizona for Joe Biden.

The lawsuit, filed in 2021, centers on allegations from the 2020 election, but with no trial date yet scheduled and extensive pre-trial motions ahead, the case could continue well into 2026.

Cassandra Buchman (Weekend Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The Smartmatic lawsuit against Fox News highlights the ongoing legal, reputational, and journalistic challenges facing media outlets in the aftermath of the 2020 US election and the spread of misinformation about election integrity.

Media accountability

The lawsuit underscores the responsibility of media organizations to verify information and the consequences that can result from the broadcast of unsubstantiated claims.

Election misinformation

Claims regarding Smartmatic and the 2020 election spotlight how misinformation can spread through major media channels, influencing public perception and potentially impacting democratic processes.

Legal and financial ramifications

Ongoing defamation litigation and previous settlements indicate significant legal and financial exposure for media companies accused of airing false or misleading content.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 42 media outlets

Context corner

Smartmatic was founded over two decades ago and became notable in global elections technology, including work in Venezuela and then expanding to major U.S. contracts. Its entry to Los Angeles County marked its first U.S. foothold during a period of rapid growth in the election technology industry.

Diverging views

Left-leaning sources focus on the lack of evidence against Smartmatic in U.S. elections and the defamation aspect, while right-leaning sources emphasize the details and implications of the bribery investigations involving Smartmatic executives.

History lesson

Election technology companies, such as Dominion and Smartmatic, have faced intense scrutiny and legal challenges after the 2020 U.S. election, but investigations and lawsuits have not shown evidence of vote tampering by these firms in U.S. contests.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left highlight a narrative deeply skeptical of Smartmatic and Fox News, emphasizing “slush fund” allegations and framing Fox’s reporting as deliberate promotion of “false conspiracy theories” to shield Trump, with emotionally charged language like “victim-blaming” underscoring systemic corruption concerns.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right use terms like “slush fund” to imply financial impropriety and focus on prosecutorial accusations without directly linking Fox News wrongdoing, reflecting a more restrained, accusatory tone that feeds distrust toward Smartmatic itself.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

42 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Federal prosecutors accuse Smartmatic employees of overbilling Los Angeles County for voting machines and creating a slush fund for bribery, according to a criminal case against executives.
  • Smartmatic filed a multibillion-dollar defamation lawsuit against Fox News, claiming the network falsely alleged it was involved in rigging the 2020 election.
  • The U.S. contract worth $209 million is considered the largest election technology deal in U.S. History, as noted by prosecutors.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • Smartmatic, an elections-technology company, faces allegations of using Los Angeles County contract proceeds to finance a 'slush fund' for bribing foreign officials.
  • Federal prosecutors claim Smartmatic co-founder Roger Pinate and colleagues were charged with bribing officials in the Philippines using funds from Los Angeles' $300 million voting machine contract.
  • Smartmatic, which is suing Fox News for defamation over false election rigging claims, denies wrongdoing and says it wins business fairly.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.