The Trump administration stopped five coal plants from retiring before 2026


Summary

Indiana and Colorado plants

The Department of Energy ordered two coal-fired power plants in Indiana and one in Colorado to keep operating past planned retirement dates at the end of 2025.

Broader policy

The Trump administration has already ordered two other coal plants to stay open while also offering federal funding to the coal industry.

Coal critics

The policy of ordering coal plants to stay open has faced legal challenges from critics who say it will cost ratepayers more money and increase pollution.


Full story

Late Tuesday evening, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued an emergency order to keep a 446-megawatt unit of the Craig Station coal plant in Craig, Colorado operating for 90 days. The Craig plant was the fifth coal power plant the Trump administration prevented from retiring in 2025.

Last week, the DOE ordered two coal-fired power plants in Indiana to stay open past planned closure dates on New Year’s Eve. The orders are the latest step in the Trump administration’s strategy to keep aging power plants running in the name of grid reliability; critics say that strategy unnecessarily prolongs the use of expensive and polluting power plants. 

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

“Keeping these coal plants online has the potential to save lives and is just common sense,” Energy Secretary Chris Wright said in a press release. Wright added that the grid needs power sources that are reliable in all weather conditions.

One DOE order calls for keeping open two coal units of the R.M. Schahfer Generating Station in Wheatfield, Indiana. The units began operating in 1983 and 1986. A second order will keep one unit at the F.B. Culley Generating Station in Warrick County running. It began operating in 1966. Combined, the three units can generate 950.7 megawatts of power — enough electricity to power roughly half a million homes. 

Why is the Trump administration pushing for more coal power? 

The DOE has also ordered coal power plants in Michigan and Washington state to extend operations past originally planned shut-down dates. 

The trend started in May with the 1,560-megawatt J.H. Campbell coal plant in West Olive, Michigan, which had a planned shut-down date at the end of that month. Two of the coal plant’s units were built in the 1960s and a third in 1980. 

The emergency order to keep it open cited electricity shortages on the midwest power grid and invoked the DOE’s authority under the Federal Power Act of 1920 and the Department of Energy Organization Act of 1977. The DOE also cited a January executive order from President Donald Trump declaring a national energy emergency. 

The emergency order said retiring the Campbell plant “would further decrease available dispatchable generation” throughout the region. As other midwest power plants had already retired, the Trump administration said keeping Campbell running was necessary to prevent shortages during summer months. The 90-day order was extended in August and again in November. 

In mid-December, a similar order extended the operations of a coal power unit at the Centralia Generating Station in Centralia, Washington. 

“The Trump administration will continue taking action to keep America’s coal plants running so we can stop the price spikes and ensure we don’t lose critical generation sources,” Wright said in a press release.

The DOE has taken similar actions to postpone the retirement or increase the capacity of power plants running on gas and oil in Maryland and Pennsylvania. 

What do opponents of keeping coal plants running say? 

The administration’s policy to keep coal plants open has faced backlash and legal challenges since the first extension of operations at the Campbell plant in Michigan.

“Mandating aging, unreliable and costly coal plants to stay open past their retirement is a guaranteed way to needlessly hike up Americans’ electricity bills and make air pollution worse,” said Ted Kelly, a director and lawyer at the nonprofit Environmental Defense Fund, in a press release

EDF is part of a coalition of groups challenging the extension of the Campbell plant in court. Michigan’s Attorney General has also filed a suit. 

The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, a nonprofit that tends to favor renewable energy, noted in a blog post that the Campbell plant has largely been operating in the red in recent years, and the cost of operating a 60-year-old facility will likely be passed on to ratepayers. 

In response to the latest extensions in Indiana, the nonprofit Earthjustice said the two coal power plants are “plagued with mechanical issues, and one unit cannot operate without major repairs.” The group’s press release said DOE is now “forcing households to pay more for coal’s deadly air and toxic water pollution.”

What will happen to coal plants in 2026? 

Litigation involving extensions of coal plant operations will extend into next year. The current 90-day extensions will expire in February and March. The DOE may simply re-issue the emergency orders, as it has already done twice for the Michigan plant.

Dozens of coal plants are slated to retire between now and 2028. Combined, they can produce 27 gigawatts of electricity, according to data analysis from Canary Media. That’s more than half the amount of power needed to keep electricity flowing on a hot summer day in California.

Tags: , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

Decisions by the Department of Energy to keep aging coal plants open highlight ongoing debates over energy reliability, environmental impacts, and the direction of future U.S. energy policy.

Energy reliability

The Department of Energy and administration officials cite grid reliability and the need for dispatchable power sources as reasons for extending coal plant operations, pointing to potential shortages if older plants are retired too quickly.

Environmental and health concerns

Advocacy groups and some local officials argue that continuing to operate older coal plants increases air and water pollution and health risks, with opposition highlighting the potential costs to both communities and ratepayers.

Policy and legal disputes

The extension orders have sparked legal challenges and debates about the federal government’s authority, the economic viability of aging infrastructure, and the broader future of energy generation in the United States.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

19 total sources

Key points from the Right

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.