Trump admin asks SCOTUS to deport 176 Venezuelan migrants


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Supreme Court appeal

The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to lift its pause on deporting nearly 200 Venezuelan migrants accused of gang ties. Officials cited a violent standoff at a Texas detention center to justify the urgency.

Historic legal basis

The administration is invoking the 1798 Alien Enemies Act for expedited deportation, citing national security risks tied to the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang. This is the fourth recorded use of the law and the first during peacetime.

Mass deportation context

The case comes amid record U.S. deportation efforts, with flights to Mexico increasing ninefold and negotiations expanding to include nations like Panama and Rwanda. Critics say legal safeguards are being sidelined.


Full story

The Trump administration has formally asked the U.S. Supreme Court to lift its temporary block on deporting nearly 200 Venezuelan migrants detained in Texas. The administration argues the migrants — alleged members of the gang Tren de Aragua — pose serious safety risks while in U.S. custody.

The filing follows an April standoff at Bluebonnet Detention Facility, where 23 detainees reportedly barricaded themselves, blocked surveillance cameras and threatened U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) staff with violence.

What happened inside the Texas detention center?

According to a sworn declaration by ICE’s Dallas Field Office director, the 23 migrants at Bluebonnet Detention Facility barricaded a housing unit for several hours on April 26. The group allegedly threatened to take hostages, damage property and harm federal officers.

ICE transferred the detainees to another facility, citing a credible threat to staff and other inmates. The solicitor general said this incident underscores the urgency of removing detainees under the Alien Enemies Act or other legal avenues.

Why is a centuries-old law being used to deport migrants?

President Donald Trump has invoked the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, a rarely used wartime law, to justify these deportations. Historically employed during declared wars, the law allows expedited removal of foreign nationals from hostile nations.

The administration argued that the gang-linked detainees present a national security threat and are too dangerous for long-term detention. This marks the fourth use of the statute in U.S. history and the first outside a formal war declaration.

The Supreme Court paused the deportations in April, requiring the government to allow migrants to challenge their removal. As of May 12, the administration claimed that no detainees had filed habeas petitions despite being notified of their rights. Solicitor General D. John Sauer asked the court to narrow its injunction or permit deportations under different immigration laws.

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

ICE has deported over 142,000 people this year, including nearly 40,000 Mexican nationals and thousands more from Central and South America.

Where are the deportees going?

Officials previously deported many Venezuelan migrants under the policy by flying them to El Salvador and holding them in facilities designated for high-risk individuals. Immigration advocates have raised concerns about conditions in those prisons. Meanwhile, deportation flights have surged. ICE has deported more than 142,000 people this year, including 38,000 Mexican nationals and thousands more from Central and South America, according to the Border Report.

What’s the broader immigration context?

This case comes as the Trump administration pushes for the largest mass deportation in U.S. history. Flights to Mexico have increased from one per week to nine. The U.S. is negotiating with countries like Panama, Honduras and Rwanda to take in deportees.

Critics said these efforts, including using the Alien Enemies Act, sideline due process and strain international partnerships.

What could the Supreme Court decide?

The justices are weighing whether emergency nationwide injunctions like the one halting these deportations are constitutionally appropriate. A related case involving birthright citizenship and executive authority limits may influence how courts can broadly block immigration actions. Legal experts said the ruling could redefine the balance of power between the executive branch and the judiciary in immigration enforcement.

Devan Markham (Morning Digital Editor), Jonah Applegarth (Production Specialist), and Kaleb Gillespie (Video Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , ,

Why this story matters

The Supreme Court’s decision on whether the Trump administration can deport nearly 200 Venezuelan migrants under the Alien Enemies Act could set major precedents for executive authority, due process rights, and the future of U.S. immigration enforcement.

Executive power

The case highlights the extent to which the executive branch can use rarely invoked statutes, like the Alien Enemies Act, to carry out immigration and deportation policies, raising questions about presidential authority.

Due process rights

The Supreme Court’s pause on deportations centers on whether migrants are being afforded adequate legal avenues to challenge their removal, underscoring ongoing debates about legal protections for non-citizens.

Immigration policy

The administration's push for mass deportations and use of international agreements to transfer detainees reflect broader shifts and controversies in American immigration enforcement and its impact on foreign relations.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 15 media outlets

Context corner

The use of the Alien Enemies Act dates back to 1798 and was typically reserved for wartime contexts. Recent actions mark a rare invocation of this law to expedite deportations, primarily targeting suspected gang members. The tension between national security and individual rights is a recurring theme in historical U.S. immigration policy debates.

Debunking

Claims regarding the gang affiliations and dangerous conduct of the detainees rely on government and ICE statements. There has not yet been independent confirmation of individual affiliations or the alleged incidents inside detention centers. Civil liberties organizations argue that many detainees have not been convicted of crimes in U.S. courts and challenge the substance of government claims.

Policy impact

The invocation of federal statutes such as the Alien Enemies Act impacts noncitizen detainees, especially those accused of gang ties. The policy intensifies detention or removal procedures, while legal blocks create uncertainty. Community advocates worry about broader impacts on immigrant rights and legal precedents for due process in deportation proceedings.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the Trump administration’s request to deport nearly 200 Venezuelan migrants primarily as a politicized attack on judicial independence, spotlighting Trump’s “rant” against “Radical Left Judges” and stressing humanitarian concerns over “expedited deportations,” thereby adopting a critical, emotionally charged tone.
  • Media outlets in the center de-emphasizes partisan language, detailing complex legal issues like class certification and habeas corpus rights.
  • Media outlets on the right emphasize national security and law enforcement, highlighting the detainees as “alleged gang members” from a “terrorist organization” and portraying the Supreme Court’s injunction as obstructing necessary action, employing assertive, security-focused rhetoric.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

15 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The Trump administration has appealed to the Supreme Court to resume deportations of Venezuelan men under the Alien Enemies Act, impacting over 500,000 immigrants from several countries, including Venezuela.
  • President Donald Trump criticized the judicial system via social media, urging for immediate deportations of criminals from the United States.
  • Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized the independence of the judiciary, stating, "The judiciary is a co-equal branch of government, separate from the others, with the authority to interpret the Constitution as law."
  • The Supreme Court temporarily halted deportations of a group of Venezuelan men in Texas, which was seen as a rebuke to Trump’s expedited deportation strategy.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On May 12, the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to remove an injunction that currently blocks the deportation of alleged members of a Venezuelan criminal organization, authorized under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, from custody in Texas.
  • This action followed a federal judge’s order halting removals of 176 detainees linked to Tren de Aragua, a Venezuelan group declared a terrorist organization by Trump in March 2025.
  • The detainees, including petitioners A.A.R.P. And W.M.M., face expedited deportations amid legal disputes over class certification and individual habeas rights in lower courts.
  • Trump expressed on Truth Social that if authorities are prevented from promptly deporting murderers and other criminals, the country’s future is at risk, adding that 90% of Americans support such deportations.
  • The Supreme Court’s decision on the injunction and authority under the Alien Enemies Act will affect ongoing deportations and highlights tensions between executive action and judicial oversight.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to lift a block on deporting Venezuelan citizens linked to a gang under the Alien Enemies Act.
  • U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer indicated that detainees are considered dangerous and should not be kept in prolonged detention.
  • The ACLU Foundation argued that individual detainees face difficult legal challenges without class certification, which was denied by the federal court.
  • The Supreme Court is reviewing the case following lower court decisions, with dissenting opinions from Justices Alito and Thomas regarding the deportation blockade.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

  • No coverage from Other sources 0 sources

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

Timeline