Trump admin ordered to fully fund SNAP benefits for November


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

$9B for November

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is mandated to use other programs to fund November’s $9 billion SNAP benefit.

Judge upset over Trump

Judge John McConnell Jr. said during a hearing he took exception to President Trump’s threats to not fund SNAP until the government reopens.

Order issued after WIC funded

The judge made the Thursday ruling after the USDA used other nutritional assistance programs to fund the Women and Infant Children program.


Full story

A federal judge in Rhode Island ordered President Donald Trump’s administration to fully fund the nation’s food stamps program by Friday, days after mandating officials to use contingency funds for the program, lawyers announced. The newest order could help more than 40 million Americans who are enrolled in SNAP benefits.

U.S. District Court Judge John J. McConnell Jr. made the ruling Thursday in a lawsuit brought forth by several nonprofit organizations and localities that argued the administration “plunged SNAP into crisis,” according to court documents. McConnell previously ordered the Trump administration to partially fund and distribute benefits as soon as possible.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

“The evidence shows that people will go hungry, food pantries will be overburdened and needless suffering will occur,” McConnell said during a hearing, NBC News reported.

The groups are being represented by legal advocacy group Democracy Forward and DeLuca, Weizenbaum, Barry and Revens Law in Rhode Island. They filed the lawsuit last week after the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers the program, said it would suspend benefits as of Saturday, Nov. 1, should the government remain closed.

“Today is a major victory for 42 million people in America,” Skye Perryman, CEO of Democracy Forward, said in a news release. “The court could not be more clear – the Trump-Vance administration must stop playing politics with people’s lives by delaying SNAP payments they are obligated to issue.”

Congress has failed to pass a funding bill and the government has been shut down since Wednesday, Oct. 1.

A pause in food assistance forced communities to rely heavily on food banks that are already helping furloughed federal workers.

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

SNAP benefits are calculated by subtracting 30% of a household’s monthly net income from maximum benefits for household size.

Trump admin ordered to fund SNAP

McConnell noted during his ruling that Trump has flouted ignoring his orders. Days after Trump’s threat, the White House said that Trump wasn’t threatening aid, but expressing frustration about needing to use emergency funds to cover it.

“In fact, the day before the compliance was ordered,” McConnell said, according to ABC News, “The president stated his intent to defy the court order when he said, ‘SNAP payments will be given only when the government opens.’”

He added that the Trump administration didn’t act to make sure that SNAP benefits were delivered this year.

The Trump administration previously agreed on Nov. 1 to use $4.65 billion in contingency funds to partially fund SNAP, which covered 65% of the $9 billion needed to fund the program. They, however, declined to use appropriations set aside for child nutrition programs as it affected the nation’s free and reduced-price school lunch program.

McConnell’s order Thursday mandates the administration to tap into those programs after the USDA used the program to fund the Women and Infant Children nutrition program, CNN reported.

“Without SNAP funding for the month of November, 16 million children are immediately at risk of going hungry,” McConnell said. “Children are immediately at risk of going hungry. This should never happen in America.”

Alex Delia (Deputy Managing Editor) and Lawrence Banton (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A federal judge has ordered President Donald Trump's administration to fully fund SNAP, affecting over 40 million Americans, amid ongoing government shutdown and legal disputes about access to food assistance.

Food assistance

Ensuring continued funding for SNAP addresses immediate food security needs for millions who rely on these benefits, especially vulnerable populations.

Government shutdown

Delays in passing a funding bill and subsequent shutdown have directly threatened the distribution of vital benefits, highlighting the intersection of governmental actions and public welfare.

Judicial intervention

Legal action compelled the executive branch to act, showcasing the judiciary’s role in upholding benefit programs and directing government compliance with obligations to citizens.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 166 media outlets

Behind the numbers

The SNAP program serves about 42 million Americans, costing between $8.5 billion and $9 billion per month. Initial plans to provide only 50% of benefits would have left nearly 5 million people with no payment for November.

Do the math

A family of four now stands to receive about $646 for November under the revised 65% allotment rather than the initial $497 at 50%. SNAP typically provides $190 per person monthly on average.

Quote bank

“Without SNAP funding for the month of November, 16 million children are immediately at risk of going hungry,” said Judge John McConnell. “We shouldn’t have to force the President to care for his citizens,” said Skye Perryman of Democracy Forward.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left framed the SNAP funding issue as the administration being "ordered" after a "legal smackdown" for "political reasons," emphasizing "steep cuts" despite revised benefits.
  • Media outlets in the center factually detailed the judge's order, the administration's appeal, and the practical unlikelihood of immediate payments, quoting the judge's "simply unacceptable.
  • Media outlets on the right highlighted "partial benefits" being "higher than estimated" and included the $4.65 billion funding figure, often de-emphasizing judicial intervention by focusing on administrative adjustments or obligations.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

331 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The judge stated that the administration needed to ensure timely delivery of benefits to avoid hunger and suffering among households.
  • Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins acknowledged that it would take several weeks to deliver the SNAP payments despite the order issued by the judge.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Wednesday, the U.S. Department of Agriculture told a federal court that allotments to SNAP beneficiaries for November will be 65% of their normal rate amid the ongoing shutdown.
  • After lawmakers failed to pass a funding bill, the Trump administration initially said benefits would be frozen but told a judge it would use contingency funds for partial payments during the 36-day shutdown.
  • The revision means a family of four in the lower 48 will receive about $646, up from $497, while the program serves 42 million Americans and timing for benefits to more than 40 million recipients remains uncertain.
  • Katie Bergh warned "Almost 5 million people will receive no benefits at al," and Center for Budget and Policy Priorities estimates USDA will spend about $3 billion, not $4.65 billion.
  • USDA warned it could take weeks or even months to deliver SNAP benefits, and Karoline Leavitt, White House press secretary, said "The recipients of the SNAP benefits need to understand it's going to take some time to receive this money."

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A federal judge in Rhode Island ruled that the Trump administration must fully fund SNAP benefits for November by Friday, citing concerns about the impacts of partial funding on recipients' lives.
  • U.S. District Judge John J. McConnell Jr. Stated that the defendants failed to consider the practical consequences of only providing 65% of the maximum benefit for SNAP.
  • The Trump administration previously announced it would not seek additional funds for SNAP payments, placing the responsibility on Congress to appropriate them.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

Timeline

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.