Trump admin sued over holding over $1B for sanctuary cities and states


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Federal victim, survivor funds

New Jersey and 21 other attorneys general are challenging the Trump administration for withholding more than $1 billion in Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) grants.

Support for crime victims

The grants fund services such as advocacy, emergency shelter, forensic exams, medical and funeral costs and lost wages, helping millions of victims annually.

Federalism concerns

The lawsuit argues the DOJ’s conditions exceed its authority, violate federalism principles and target sanctuary jurisdictions.


Full story

New Jersey is joining 21 other state attorneys general in a lawsuit to recover more than $1 billion in federal funds intended for crime victims and survivors. The coalition says the Trump administration is unlawfully withholding the grants unless states comply with its immigration enforcement requirements.

Background on VOCA and its purpose

The lawsuit, filed Monday in Rhode Island’s federal district court, cites that Congress passed the Victims of Crime Act more than 40 years ago to address the criminal justice system’s long-standing neglect of crime victims, which a presidential task force once called a “national disgrace.” 

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

“First put in place by Ronald Reagan after a study of how victims of crime were treated in this country uncovered widespread systemic failures and how we support those who have endured these unimaginable traumas,” New Jersey Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin said during a virtual press conference

VOCA set up grant programs to help states provide critical services to victims and survivors, including advocacy, emergency shelter, forensic exams for sexual assault, medical and funeral expenses and compensation for lost wages. The complaint says all of these programs total more than $1 billion this year alone, which have helped states support public safety and assist victims. 

Between 2021 and 2024, states used VOCA funds to aid an average of 8.5 million crime victims annually and paid more than 200,000 claims each year for victims’ losses.

Allegations against the Trump administration

“Playing politics with the lives of people who have suffered so greatly is reckless, it is cruel, and in this case, it is illegal,” said Platkin. We are filing suit today to stand up for our residents and for the law, which prevents these unlawful conditions on congressionally authorized funding. We look forward to blocking these conditions and preventing further harms to crime victims.”

The lawsuit claims the Trump administration, through the Department of Justice, is conditioning federal crime victim funds on states’ cooperation with its immigration enforcement priorities. To receive the grants, states would have to assist the Department of Homeland Security with civil immigration enforcement.

Sanctuary jurisdictions and federal enforcement

On Aug. 5, the Department of Justice released an updated list of sanctuary jurisdictions, which it says hinder federal immigration enforcement. The list includes states such as California, Colorado, Delaware, Illinois, Rhode Island and Oregon. The DOJ has also filed lawsuits against various states and cities, arguing their sanctuary policies conflict with federal law.

The filing argues that this approach violates basic principles of federalism and separation of powers. According to the coalition, Congress did not authorize the Justice Department to tie these grant programs to states’ participation in immigration enforcement. 

The lawsuit is co-led by the attorneys general of New Jersey, California, Delaware, Illinois and Rhode Island and is supported by a coalition of 16 additional states and the District of Columbia. They are asking a judge to issue an injunction to block the Trump administration from withholding the funds.

Tags: , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The lawsuit determines whether federal funding for millions of crime victims can be withheld based on states’ cooperation with immigration enforcement, directly affecting the resources available to survivors.

Federal funding restrictions

The case addresses whether the federal government can lawfully withhold crime victim funds from states based on compliance with immigration enforcement requirements.

Victim support programs

The outcome could affect millions of crime victims who rely on federally funded services such as advocacy, shelter and compensation for losses.

Federalism and state autonomy

The lawsuit highlights ongoing debates about the extent of federal power over states, particularly regarding conditions attached to grant funding and the interplay with immigration policies.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.