Trump administration secures 15% cut of Nvidia, AMD China chip sales


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Revenue sharing

Nvidia and AMD will remit 15% of revenue from China AI-chip sales to the U.S. government in exchange for export licenses covering Nvidia’s H20 and AMD’s MI308. After Jensen Huang met President Trump, licenses began issuing; projections suggest the payments could top $2 billion by year’s end.

Policy reversal

The administration reversed an April ban in July to allow lower-spec chips, with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick saying the U.S. should “stay one step ahead” and not sell its “best” chips. Former officials Peter Harrell and Christopher Padilla warned the 15% requirement is unprecedented and may resemble an unconstitutional export tax.

China pushback

China’s cyberspace regulator raised “backdoor” concerns about Nvidia’s H20, and a CCTV-linked account urged buyers to avoid the chips. Nvidia denied any backdoors, spyware or kill switches, calling such vulnerabilities unacceptable.


Full story

Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices have agreed to give the U.S. government 15% of revenue from artificial intelligence chip sales in China under a new arrangement with the Trump administration. The payments are tied to the companies obtaining export licenses for their products – Nvidia’s H20 and AMD’s MI308 – which earlier national security rules had restricted.

According to people familiar with the agreement, Nvidia Chief Executive Jensen Huang met with President Donald Trump at the White House last week to finalize the terms. The Commerce Department began issuing export licenses two days later. The deal could generate more than $2 billion for the federal government by year’s end. That number is based on analyst projections of $15 billion in H20 sales for Nvidia and $800 million for AMD in China.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Why is the arrangement unusual?

Export controls have traditionally been used to protect national security, not as a means to raise revenue. Some former officials and trade experts say the 15% requirement could resemble an export tax, which the Constitution forbids. They warn that it sets a precedent for linking security policy to financial gain.

Peter Harrell, a former White House economic adviser, argued that the deal violates the U.S. Constitution’s ban on export taxes. Christopher Padilla, a former export control official in the George W. Bush administration, described it as “unprecedented and dangerous,” suggesting it could be perceived as bribery or blackmail.

What led to the policy shift on AI chip sales?

In April, the Trump administration banned sales of certain AI chips to China over security concerns. The White House reversed course in July, shortly before a new round of trade talks with Beijing, allowing sales of the lower-spec H20 chip designed for the Chinese market. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has said the U.S. will not permit exports of Nvidia’s most advanced chips, but will allow sales of less powerful models to maintain a competitive edge.

Huang argued that a full ban would cede the Chinese market to domestic competitor Huawei, which could use the profits to accelerate its own AI development. He said keeping American companies in the market would help sustain U.S. leadership in AI technology.

How has China responded?

China’s Cyberspace Administration summoned Nvidia officials last month over concerns that the H20 could contain security “backdoors.” A social media account linked to state broadcaster CCTV warned the chips were not advanced, safe or environmentally friendly. They said consumers could choose not to buy them. Nvidia has denied the presence of backdoors, spyware or remote shutdown features, calling such vulnerabilities dangerous and unacceptable.

Chinese officials have also pushed to expand domestic chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. technology. Reports indicate Beijing may seek U.S. concessions on high-bandwidth memory chips as part of broader trade negotiations ahead of a potential summit between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping.

Jake Larsen (Video Editor), Jason K. Morrell (Morning Managing Editor), and Julia Marshall (Morning Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The new agreement requiring Nvidia and AMD to pay a percentage of AI chip sales revenue to the U.S. government for export licenses to China raises questions about export policies, national security and trade practices amid U.S.-China technology competition.

Export controls and revenue

The deal's use of export license revenue marks a departure from traditional export controls, leading experts to question its legality and implications for future trade policy.

U.S.-China technology competition

The arrangement directly impacts the competitive landscape between U.S. and Chinese technology sectors, influencing market dynamics and efforts to maintain U.S. leadership in AI.

Legal and ethical concerns

Critics argue that the agreement may conflict with constitutional restrictions on export taxes and sets a precedent that could blur lines between security policy and financial motives.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 149 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Nvidia generated about $17 billion from China in the last fiscal year (13% of its total), AMD made $6.2 billion there (24% of its total). Analysts estimate the US government could collect over $2 billion annually from the 15% revenue share.

Community reaction

The tech industry and some policy experts are expressing concern and confusion, with several analysts labeling the move unprecedented. Critics include security specialists fearing national security risks and business analysts noting the financial impact on the companies involved.

Context corner

Export controls on advanced chips were initially imposed for national security, with previous bans under the Biden administration. The US and China have ongoing tech and trade disputes, with export controls and tariffs often used as leverage in negotiations.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left emphasize the national security risks of Nvidia and AMD’s deal to pay 15% of China chip sales revenue to the U.S., framing it as "trading away national security protections for Treasury revenue" and spotlighting sharp critiques from former Biden officials, using skeptical language like "wild" to question the rationale.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right highlight economic competitiveness and political strategy, portraying the arrangement as an "unprecedented" revenue-sharing success and a positive step following Trump’s engagement, employing terms like "major revenue-sharing deal" with a tone of cautious optimism.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

149 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Nvidia and AMD will pay 15% of their revenue from chip sales to China to the U.S. government, according to a U.S. official.
  • The U.S. Commerce Department has started issuing licenses for H20 chip sales to China, despite prior restrictions from the Trump administration.
  • Nvidia expressed compliance with U.S. government rules and hopes to resume chip shipments soon, according to a spokesperson.
  • Alasdair Phillips-Robins criticized the arrangement, suggesting it compromises national security for financial gain.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Nvidia and AMD will pay 15% of their revenues from chip sales to China to the U.S. government under a deal with the Trump administration for export licenses.
  • Nvidia's revenue-sharing includes 15% from its H20 chip sales, and AMD's from its MI308 chip sales, as confirmed by a U.S. official.
  • This agreement is unusual and has drawn criticism from national security experts who fear it may enhance China's military capabilities.
  • Experts criticize the financial concession for export approval, arguing it could blur national security and economic strategy lines.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.