Trump calls Hawley a ‘second-tier Senator’ over stock trading bill


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Criticism

President Donald Trump criticized GOP Sen. Josh Hawley following a vote on a bill that would ban federal elected officials from trading or owning stock.

Response

Hawley responded to the president’s criticism, saying he wants Trump’s support and stressed that the president would not be impacted by the law.

Pelosi’s support

Former Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has expressed support for the bill and framed it as an issue of public interest.


Full story

Republican U.S. Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri is defending his proposed bill to ban stock trading by federal lawmakers — as well as by the president and vice president — in the face of criticism from President Donald Trump.

The legislation passed a key hurdle Wednesday, clearing the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee in an 8-7 vote. Hawley was the lone Republican to side with Democrats in advancing the bill.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Trump lashes out on Truth Social 

In a Truth Social post, Trump dubbed Hawley a “second-tier Senator” and accused him of “playing right into the dirty hands of Democrats.”

“I don’t think real Republicans want to see their President, who has had unprecedented success, TARGETED, because of the ‘whims’ of a second-tier Senator named Josh Hawley!” Trump claimed.

Hawley responds: ‘I want results’ 

Hawley said he hopes Trump will support the bill and is open to making changes to gain his approval. 

“Listen, I want the president to sign the bill, so I’m happy to do whatever it would take to get him to say, ‘Yes, this is good.’” Hawley said after Trump’s social media post. “I want results.”

Hawley emphasized that under the current version, Trump would not be required to divest his holdings during his current term. The bill would ban stock trading for executive and legislative branch officials immediately — but mandates divestment only at the start of their next terms.

The bill gains Pelosi’s support

Hawley originally dubbed the bill the PELOSI Act, after former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, whose family’s trades have drawn GOP scrutiny.

“[Trump’s] not covered by the PELOSI Act, but Nancy Pelosi is,” Hawley said. 

The bill has since been renamed the HONEST Act. Pelosi said she supports the measure and plans to vote for it. 

“The American people deserve confidence that their elected leaders are serving the public interest — not their personal portfolios,” Pelosi said in a statement.

Trump tried to soften the rules — and failed 

Republican lawmakers had attempted to work with the Trump team to include a carve-out for the presidency, but Hawley and Democrats blocked the effort. Trump also criticized Hawley for opposing a separate GOP amendment that would have specifically targeted the stock trades of Pelosi and her husband, Paul Pelosi. However, while her husband is a trader, the former speaker’s office acknowledged that Nancy Pelosi does not personally own stock.

“We have an opportunity here today to do something that the public has wanted to do for decades,” Hawley said to the panel. “And that is to ban members of Congress from profiting on information that frankly only members of Congress have on the buying and selling of stock.”

A longstanding concern in Washington

Lawmakers from both parties have long faced scrutiny over stock trading while in office. During the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, some members were found to have traded stocks after receiving closed-door briefings. Unlike the general public, federal lawmakers are not always held to the same insider trading laws. 

If the legislation is signed into law, it would immediately ban elected officials, including the president, from purchasing stocks, and would bar them from selling stocks for 90 days after the law takes effect. It also mandates that elected officials divest from all covered commodities, but they would not be required to do so until the beginning of their next term in office — which would exempt Trump from the ban.

Trump also targets Grassley 

Trump’s attack on Hawley comes just a day after he criticized Republican U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley on Truth Social.

On Tuesday, Trump pressured Grassley to get rid of the Senate’s 100-year-old tradition known as a “Blue Slip” that often requires bipartisan support on presidential nominations of federal judges. That custom forces both federal senators from any one state to agree to move forward a nominee for a vote. 

“Senator Grassley must step up,” Trump wrote on Tuesday, July 29, while saying he helped the long-time senator get reelected. 

Grassley responded on Wednesday and said he was “offended” by Trump’s comments.

Jason K. Morrell (Morning Managing Editor) and Matt Bishop (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A bill to ban stock trading by federal lawmakers and top officials is advancing in Congress, drawing rare bipartisan support, high-level Republican criticism and renewed debate on ethics and accountability in government.

Stock trading ban

Proposed legislation would prohibit federal lawmakers, executive and legislative officials, the president and the vice president from trading stocks while in office, aiming to address concerns about conflicts of interest and to restore public trust in government decision-making.

Political tensions

The bill has become a source of disagreement within the Republican Party, as President Donald Trump criticized Senator Josh Hawley for advancing it, illustrating divisions over transparency and accountability measures.

Government ethics

The story highlights longstanding scrutiny over elected officials' access to sensitive information and questions about their personal financial interests, fueling ongoing debates on ethics reform in Washington.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 61 media outlets

Behind the numbers

Polling cited by several sources indicates that over 80% of voters support a ban on congressional stock trading. About one in five lawmakers traded stocks related to their committee work as reported in a 2022 New York Times investigation.

Common ground

All sources agree that the issue of congressional stock trading has raised concerns about conflicts of interest and public trust in government, and that the HONEST Act seeks to address this by extending a trading ban to Congress, the president and vice president.

Debunking

Reports referenced allegations of insider trading by public officials but note that former Speaker Nancy Pelosi does not personally own stocks, according to her office. Previous investigations have not resulted in official findings of criminal wrongdoing by targeted lawmakers.

History lesson

Previous attempts to ban congressional stock trading, including the STOCK Act in 2012, have not fully prevented controversial trades. Enforcement gaps and public skepticism have led to renewed pushes for stricter legislation like the HONEST Act.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left emphasize the stock trading ban bill as a necessary and critical ethics reform effort, framing Senator Hawley’s bipartisan support as a break from GOP resistance and portraying Trump’s “second-tier senator” label as part of his attempts to enforce party loyalty.
  • Not enough unique coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right cover Trump’s blunt rebuke as justified defense against a “Democrat-backed” measure, using charged language such as “sabotage” to cast the bill — and Hawley’s vote — as threats to GOP interests.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

61 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • President Donald Trump criticized Senator Josh Hawley, calling him a "second-tier Senator," after Hawley's proposal to ban stock trading by Congress members advanced with bipartisan support.
  • Hawley stated that the legislation fulfills a public demand to address stock trading by lawmakers and did not respond immediately to Trump's comments on social media.
  • The Honest Act, supported by Hawley and Peters along with Democrats, aims to prevent Congress members and top officials from engaging in stock trading while in office.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • Trump criticized Senator Josh Hawley as a "second-tier Senator" on Truth Social after a vote concerning stock-trading legislation.
  • Trump accused Hawley of aligning with Democrats and described him as a pawn in their alleged efforts against him.
  • Hawley was the only Republican senator to support the stock trading bill when it was released from committee.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • President Donald Trump criticized Senator Josh Hawley for supporting the HONEST Act, which aims to ban stock trading for lawmakers, calling Hawley a "second-tier" Senator and implying that he is aiding Democrats.
  • Senator Josh Hawley denied that the White House lobbied against the bill and stated that the bill is necessary to prevent conflicts of interest among lawmakers.
  • Support among the public for banning Congress from trading stocks remains high.
  • The Senate committee advanced the HONEST Act, designed to ensure public trust, with all Democrats and Hawley voting in favor, while most Republican members opposed it.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.