Trump cancels plan to send federal agents into San Francisco


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Agents to San Francisco

The Trump administration has reportedly dispatched more than 100 federal immigration and border patrol agents to the San Francisco area.

Details limited

Agents reportedly begin arriving Thursday, but the Department of Homeland Security has not disclosed specifics of the operation.

Opposition

Some Democratic lawmakers have come out against the move, including Rep. Nancy Pelosi, who represents a large portion of San Francisco.


Full story

President Donald Trump said he will not send federal agents into San Francisco after several reports stated he was. The president made the announcement in a Truth Social post on Thursday.

In his post, Trump said friends of his “who live in the area” called him to say they didn’t want him to send more than 100 federal agents into the city. He said that he spoke with San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie on Wednesday and “gave him a chance” to fix crime in the area.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

“I spoke to Mayor Lurie last night and he asked, very nicely, that I give him a chance to see if he can turn it around,” Trump wrote. “I told him I think he is making a mistake, because we can do it much faster, and remove the criminals that the Law does not permit him to remove.”

The president also said that the city has “come together” to tackle crime and stated the push started after he began using federal authorities to arrest criminals in major cities.

What was the original plan for San Francisco?

Before Trump made his announcement, reports stated his administration would deploy more than 100 federal agents for a major immigration enforcement effort in the San Francisco area.

Sources familiar with the effort told the San Francisco Chronicle that agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) were slated to arrive Thursday at Coast Guard Base Alameda near Oakland.

The White House did not release specifics of the operation, but the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE and CBP, released a statement to CBS News regarding the development.

“DHS is targeting the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens — including murderers, rapists, gang members, pedophiles, and terrorists — in cities such as Portland, Chicago, Memphis and San Francisco,” the spokesperson stated. “As it does every day, DHS law enforcement will enforce the laws of our nation.”

Trump may invoke the Insurrection Act

President Donald Trump has also suggested that he may invoke the Insurrection Act, a measure that allows presidents to deploy troops on American soil.

Trump has already sent National Guard troops to Chicago, Memphis, Portland and Washington, and has deployed both the National Guard and the Marines to Los Angeles. He said the deployments were necessary to quell protests, protect ICE facilities and combat “out of control” crime — even though most of those cities have recorded significantly lower crime rates in recent years.

In an interview on Fox News on Sunday, Trump indicated that San Francisco was the next target.

“We’re going to San Francisco and we’ll make it great,” Trump said. “It’ll be great again. San Francisco is a great city. It won’t be great if it keeps going like this. We’re going to San Francisco. The difference is they want us in San Francisco.”

Federal intervention unwelcome

Lurie, a Democrat, said earlier this week that dispatching troops to his city would not help combat the drug crisis, adding that soldiers were not legally authorized to arrest drug dealers. 

City Attorney David Chiu has threatened to sue the Trump administration to prevent the potential deployment of any troops to San Francisco.

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

Violent crime in San Francisco is down substantially since 2019, below the national average, while property crime is slowly falling but still above the average.

The region’s congressional representatives — Rep. Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Kevin Mullin, both Democrats — strongly oppose the surge of immigration enforcement by ICE and CBP.

They indicated on Wednesday that local authorities may arrest federal agents who break California law while performing immigration raids in the San Francisco area.

“While the President may enjoy absolute immunity courtesy of his rogue Supreme Court, those who operate under his orders do not,” the representatives said in a statement. “Our state and local authorities may arrest federal agents if they break California law — and if they are convicted, the President cannot pardon them.”

Scholars question legality of threat

Legal scholars interviewed by The New York Times said that the arrest of federal agents may not be plausible if they are performing official duties. But lawsuits are possible if they are found to have violated the law while conducting immigration raids.

According to the San Francisco Chronicle, parts of California have different rules governing how aggressively federal immigration agents can detain and deport unauthorized immigrants.

Mathew Grisham (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

Federal immigration enforcement and potential military intervention in San Francisco have sparked legal, political and jurisdictional disputes, highlighting tensions between local and federal authorities over immigration and law enforcement policy.

Federal-local conflict

The deployment of federal agents and possible invocation of military measures has raised concerns among local officials who stress the legal and political challenges of federal intervention in city affairs.

Legal challenges

San Francisco leaders and legal scholars have questioned the legality of arresting federal agents acting on duty, reflecting broader uncertainties about the limits of federal authority and state or local legal protections.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 111 media outlets

Behind the numbers

More than 100 federal agents, including U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel, are reported to be deployed to Coast Guard Base Alameda. San Francisco's violent crime rate is described by multiple officials as being at historic lows.

Diverging views

Articles in the left category frame the deployment as a politically motivated tactic to incite unrest and intimidate immigrant communities, while right-leaning sources emphasize enforcing immigration law and public safety, sometimes dismissing claims of political motivation.

Quote bank

"These tactics are designed to incite backlash, chaos and violence, which are then used as an excuse to deploy military personnel," said San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie. "We are leveraging our unique authorities and capabilities to detect, deter, and interdict illegal aliens…" said a Coast Guard statement.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the deployment of "more than 100 federal agents" as a provocative "surge operation" designed to "incite 'chaos and violence'," with language like "flooding" and comparisons to a "dictator's handbook" highlighting perceived political motivations.
  • Media outlets in the center neutrally state "dispatches 100 immigration agents" and include public sentiment that "strongly reject" the federal presence, de-emphasizing political intent or specific enforcement justifications.
  • Media outlets on the right emphasize strong executive action, using "Deploys" and justifying the operation by targeting "worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens" in a "sanctuary jurisdiction," anticipating a "meltdown" from local opposition.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

114 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The Trump administration plans to deploy over 100 federal agents from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to San Francisco for an immigration crackdown starting this week.
  • California Gov. Gavin Newsom condemned the actions, stating they create "conditions for anxiety" in communities.
  • San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie expressed intentions for peaceful protests against what he called "un-American tactics" targeting immigrant communities.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • More than 100 federal agents are heading to the Bay Area for a major immigration operation, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.
  • San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie has stated that sending troops to the city will not make it safer, while President Trump has insisted that the military's presence is being requested in San Francisco.
  • Gov. Gavin Newsom recently threatened to sue the Trump administration if the National Guard is sent to the Bay Area, and he stated that the Guard's presence in Los Angeles has cost taxpayers $120 million.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The U.S. Coast Guard is providing support for U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents in San Francisco to help track down individuals in the country illegally.
  • Over 100 CBP agents are arriving at Alameda to focus on serious criminal illegal aliens.
  • California Gov. Gavin Newsom condemned the deployment, warning that it would provoke violent protests.
  • Trump asserted that San Francisco was once one of the great cities but has since labeled it as having gone "wrong" due to its policies.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.