Trump judicial nominee Emil Bove misled Senate during hearing: Whistleblower


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Second whistleblower

A second whistleblower has come forward to oppose Emil Bove’s nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals.

Bove's confirmation hearing

Evidence reviewed by some senators and The Washington Post appears to show Bove may have misled the Senate during his confirmation hearing.

Request for probe

Two members of the Senate Judiciary committee asked the Department of Justice’s watchdog for a full investigation into the claims.


Full story

Emil Bove, a Trump judicial nominee, may have misled the Senate during his confirmation hearing, according to evidence presented by a whistleblower to The Washington Post. The report led two Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee to ask the Justice Department’s watchdog to look into the allegations.

President Donald Trump nominated Bove, his former attorney and a top Justice Department (DOJ) official, in June to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals — a lifetime appointment. Bove’s nomination process has moved faster than is typical.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

What evidence did the whistleblower present?

The whistleblower allegedly shared evidence that contradicted Bove’s testimony about his handling of the public corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, according to the report published Tuesday. However, The Post did not specify what the evidence contained.

Multiple senators, including Sens. Cory Booker, D-N.J., and Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, reviewed the whistleblower’s evidence. The individual allegedly also offered the evidence to Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., who is not seeking reelection. Tillis had not responded to the request, according to The Post.

Booker and Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., sent a letter to the DOJ’s top watchdog asking for a review of the evidence, according to Politico.

“In the event these whistleblower complaints and other reports have not already prompted investigations by your office, we urge you to undertake a thorough review of these disclosures and allegations,” the senators wrote. 

Booker and Schiff also said the Senate needed to have “full knowledge” of the evidence before Bove’s final confirmation vote.

Additional whistleblower allegations

The new whistleblower allegations come after additional reports that Bove told U.S. Department of Justice officials to ignore a judge’s order not to deport unauthorized migrants to El Salvador. Leaked emails and texts from whistleblower and former DOJ lawyer Erez Reuveni, released during the week of July 7, claimed Bove advised DOJ attorneys that it was okay to take the prisoners off the plane in El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act.

Bove’s credentials were also called into question by a group of more than 900 former Department of Justice attorneys, who asked Senate Judiciary Committee members to take more time before voting on his nomination.

Pierce Sharpe (Executive Editor) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

The integrity of the federal judicial nomination process is under scrutiny after whistleblower allegations suggest Emil Bove, a Trump judicial nominee, may have provided misleading testimony to the Senate.

Judicial transparency

Allegations that Emil Bove may have misled the Senate highlight concerns about honesty and accountability expected from nominees to lifetime judicial positions.

Whistleblower claims

Evidence presented by a whistleblower led senators to urge further investigation, emphasizing the role whistleblowers play in fostering governmental oversight and transparency.

Senate oversight

Calls from senators to delay a confirmation vote until a thorough review is completed underscore the importance of legislative oversight in the judicial appointment process.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.