Trump moves to open 44 million forest acres to roads, logging, citing wildfire risk


Full story

The Trump administration plans to remove longstanding protections on more than 44 million acres of national forest, opening the door to new roads, logging and development.

The Forest Service has proposed eliminating the 2001 “Roadless Rule,” which has limited road construction and logging in remote forest areas for 25 years.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the Straight Arrow app today to get the stories that matter free from manipulation, bias or agenda.™

Point phone camera here

With roads blocked in these areas, the rule also inhibits activities such as mining and oil and gas drilling.

Most of the land — over 95% — is in ten western states, including Alaska, California, Montana, Oregon and Washington. Colorado and Idaho would not be affected because they have their own roadless regulations.

According to the administration, the rule protects 44-million of the National Forest System’s 193 million acres.

Landscape views of the forest surrounding Mount Hood, April 30, 2026, in Mt.Hood National Forest, Oregon. While preserved as part of the national forest system, the land is also logged by timber companies. (Photo by Andrew Lichtenstein/ Corbis via Getty Images)

What the administration is saying

In a press release Tuesday, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said the rule has hindered efforts to clear overgrowth and manage fire hazards because forest managers cannot easily access some areas.

“For too long, outdated restrictions have kept tens of millions of forested acres off-limits to the very treatments that improve forest health and reduce wildfire risk to our communities.”

She said by removing the “Roadless Rule,” the administration would “restore authority to local forest managers who know the land best.”

“It’s time to turn the page on the failed roadless rule and return our forests to health and productivity,” Rollins said.

Visitors walk through Muir Woods National Monument on July 24, 2025 in Muir Woods National Monument, California. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Ecologists and experts speak out

Some fire ecologists warn that expanding roads could increase fire risk by attracting more people to largely undisturbed areas. They also say it could harm the forests.

“The Forest Service’s misguided proposal will clear the way for reckless projects that can permanently scar these spectacular roadless landscapes and do long-lasting harm to countless communities that depend on our national forests for tourism, recreation, and clean drinking water,” wrote Kristin Gendzier, a senior attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center, in a statement to The Hill.

This change wouldn’t automatically permit logging on all 44 million acres; local forest managers would make those decisions.

This is still a proposal, with the Forest Service accepting public comment through Sept. 21 at regulations.gov.

Round out your reading

Tags: , ,

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

A federal proposal would lift 25-year-old restrictions on road construction, logging and resource extraction across 44 million acres of national forest, primarily in western states.

Recreation and water access at stake

According to critics, communities that rely on national forests for tourism, recreation and clean drinking water could face long-lasting harm if the proposal is adopted.

Public comment window open

The Forest Service is accepting public comments on the proposal through Sept. 21 at regulations.gov, giving residents a direct way to weigh in before any decision is finalized.

Western states most affected

More than 95% of the land under review is in ten western states, including California, Montana, Oregon and Washington, making the proposal most immediately relevant to residents in those areas.

Straight Arrow
Fear No Fact.

Don't just take our word for it.


Center-rated reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Center-rated reporting May 2026

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame rescinding the 2001 Roadless Rule as an environmental rollback, stressing “millions” of “pristine” acres, wildlife habitat, and possible “corporate giveaway,” while warning roads could worsen fires.
  • Media outlets in the center present both claims and the disputed wildfire evidence, underscoring a broader regulation-versus-management divide.
  • Media outlets on the right portray the same proposal as ending “outdated restrictions” to enable “wildfire control,” local management, roads, and timber treatments, sometimes mocking critics as a “hissy fit.”

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

114 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The Trump administration proposed rescinding the 2001 Roadless Rule, which protects about 44 to 45 million acres of national forests from road construction and logging, aiming to ease wildfire management and give local forest managers more control.
  • The Roadless Rule protects critical habitats for endangered species and provides clean drinking water to millions, and its removal could lead to increased road building, habitat destruction, and threats to wildlife such as grizzlies and lynx.
  • Environmental groups like NRDC and the Center for Biological Diversity strongly oppose the move, arguing it endangers ecosystems, water quality, and wildfires risks, and disregards public opinion supporting forest protections.
  • The administration claims lifting restrictions will reduce wildfire risk and improve forest health treatments, but critics warn it may increase human-caused wildfires and undermine conservation efforts.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Tuesday, the Trump administration proposed rescinding the 2001 Roadless Rule, a move that would open nearly 45 million acres of national forest to road construction, logging, and other development across 37 states.
  • Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said the proposal restores authority to local forest managers, arguing that removing outdated restrictions will improve forest health and reduce wildfire risk to communities.
  • Environmental groups like the Natural Resources Defense Council argue the rescission increases wildfire risk, citing studies showing human-caused ignitions are four times more likely in areas with roads than roadless forests.
  • Forests currently provide drinking water to 180 million Americans, and critics warn that development could degrade watersheds while harming local economies relying on recreation spots like the Appalachian Trail.
  • The Agriculture Department opened a 30-day public comment period ending September 21, as the timber industry seeks to develop projects on millions of acres of old-growth trees previously protected from commercial logging.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The U.S. Forest Service proposes to rescind the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule, which protects nearly 45 million acres of roadless national forest lands from road construction and logging across multiple states.
  • The agency claims the rule limits wildfire risk reduction and hinders forest health treatments by restricting the authority of local forest managers.
  • Conservation groups oppose the proposal, arguing that removing protections threatens ecosystems and will not effectively reduce wildfire risks.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™