Trump proposes 100% tariff on foreign films, rattling Hollywood


Summary

Hollywood tariffs

Trump proposed a 100% tariff on foreign films, calling them a national security threat in a "dying" Hollywood.

Industry confusion

Industry insiders warn the tariff could backfire, raising costs and damaging both U.S. and global film industries.

Political hurdles

Experts question Trump's authority to impose such tariffs under current law.


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Hollywood tariffs

Trump proposed a 100% tariff on foreign films, calling them a national security threat in a "dying" Hollywood.

Industry confusion

Industry insiders warn the tariff could backfire, raising costs and damaging both U.S. and global film industries.

Political hurdles

Experts question Trump's authority to impose such tariffs under current law.


Full story

President Donald Trump has announced plans to impose a 100% tariff on films produced outside the United States. The proposal has left Hollywood insiders scrambling for answers as few policy details were revealed.

Trump made the announcement Sunday night, May 4, on Truth Social, warning that “the movie industry in America is dying a very fast death.” He framed the issue as a national security threat, calling foreign-made films part of a “concerted effort by other nations” to spread propaganda.

Why films leave the US

For years, states like California, New York and Georgia have offered tax credits to keep productions at home. However, many actors and producers say it’s still often cheaper to film overseas.

According to a study by film industry expert Stephen Follows, about one-third of top-grossing films from 2000 to 2019 were filmed outside the U.S. Notable examples include the “Harry Potter” series, shot almost entirely in Britain, and “Avengers: Endgame,” which filmed some scenes in London despite doing most of its production in Georgia.

Initial questions and confusion

One major question is how the tariff would apply to films made partly in the U.S. and partly abroad.

The White House told The Washington Post on Monday, May 5, that no final decisions have been made, but “the administration is exploring all options to deliver on President Trump’s directive to safeguard our country’s national and economic security while Making Hollywood Great Again.”

While the Motion Picture Association declined to comment, some industry leaders are voicing concern.

Jay Sures, vice chairman of United Talent Agency, told CNN, “In its current form, the tariff doesn’t make sense.”

Producer Randy Greenberg posted on LinkedIn, “This will have the opposite effect. It will kill the movie industry faster. If you have to shoot in Thailand or Sydney or the UK, because that’s where the movie narrative is located, then what?”

Impact on global industries

International partners are also worried. A senior British film industry figure told The Guardian the move could wipe out the UK’s film industry and its workforce.

Meanwhile, California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office emphasized the state’s commitment to supporting its iconic film sector. A spokesperson told The Wrap that Newsom’s plan to double California’s tax credits reflects his commitment to keeping jobs local — and that his office would review any formal tariff proposal.

Bob Salladay, Newsom’s senior communications advisor, told Deadline they believe Trump lacks the legal authority to impose tariffs under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act, since “tariffs are not listed as a remedy under that law.”

Trump’s Hollywood alliances

This move comes months after Trump tapped actors Jon Voight, Mel Gibson and Sylvester Stallone as special ambassadors to Hollywood. According to Deadline, Voight has recently met with union leaders and studio executives. 

Sources suggest federal tax incentives could soon become part of the conversation, though this might clash with Trump’s other fiscal goals, including cutting national debt.

No concrete details yet

Trump told reporters Sunday night, “Other nations have been stealing the … movie-making capability of the United States. I have done some very strong research over the last week, and we are making very few movies now.”

For now, Hollywood workers and studios are left waiting for clear details on how the proposed tariffs will actually unfold and what they will mean for one of America’s most famous industries.

Zachary Hill (Video Editor) and Drew Pittock (Evening Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , ,

Why this story matters

President Trump’s announced plan to impose a 100% tariff on foreign-produced films raises significant questions about trade policy, the future of the American film industry, and global cultural exchange.

Trade policy and protectionism

The introduction of a tariff on foreign-made films illustrates an escalation of protectionist trade measures, potentially affecting international economic relations and setting new precedents for tariffs on services.

Film industry and production shift

This move responds to the trend of American film productions relocating overseas for cost or incentive reasons, potentially reshaping where and how major films are produced and impacting jobs, costs, and collaboration within the industry.

Global cultural and economic consequences

Industry officials say imposing tariffs on international films could disrupt the exchange of cultural products, increase production costs, risk international retaliation, and alter how global audiences access and engage with diverse cinema.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 590 media outlets

Debunking

There is no evidence presented in the articles that the U.S. film industry is on the verge of collapse, as claimed in some statements. While production numbers in certain regions have declined and foreign incentives have drawn business, American films still dominate global box offices and exports, and the U.S. maintains a positive trade balance in film.

Do the math

American movies reportedly earned $22.6 billion in exports and a $15.3 billion trade surplus in 2023. Film and TV production in Los Angeles declined 20% in 2023. Up to half of U.S. movie and TV project budgets above $40 million were spent overseas in 2023. Streaming services like Netflix derive about 70% of subscribers from outside the U.S.

History lesson

Attempts to restrict foreign competition in film are not new. In previous decades, other countries have set quotas or barriers for foreign films, leading to trade disputes and occasional reduction in Hollywood’s global influence. Policies aimed at protecting domestic industries sometimes triggered retaliation and unintended consequences, often failing to reverse long-term trends in outsourcing.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left predominantly frame Trump’s 100% tariff on foreign movies as a reckless, market-disrupting move steeped in emotive language like “throws a fit” and “devastated,” emphasizing political risks, foreign “stealing” of U.S. filmmaking, and skepticism toward Trump’s national security rationale as “propaganda.”
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right employ patriotic and optimistic rhetoric — highlighting phrases like “WE WANT MOVIES MADE IN AMERICA, AGAIN!” and envisioning a “Golden Age of Hollywood” — while uniquely stressing broader economic disruptions, legal complexities of taxing intellectual property, and challenges from streaming.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

590 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • President Donald Trump announced plans for a 100% tariff on foreign-made films, claiming it would protect national security.
  • California Gov. Gavin Newsom criticized Trump's authority to impose tariffs, arguing he lacks the legal basis under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act.
  • The film industry has struggled recently, and Trump's announcement caused concern among studios that rely on international production.
  • White House spokesman Kush Desai stated that while no final decisions have been made, the administration is exploring options to implement the tariffs.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • President Donald Trump authorized a 100% tariff on foreign-made films imported into the United States on May 4.
  • Trump cited national security concerns and argued other countries offer incentives that draw filmmaking away from the U.S., threatening its industry.
  • U.S. film production has declined due to setbacks like the pandemic, guild strikes, and wildfires, while many productions relocate abroad for tax breaks.
  • Trump stated, "WE WANT MOVIES MADE IN AMERICA, AGAIN!" and authorized the Commerce Department and U.S. Trade Representative to impose this tariff.
  • The tariff aims to encourage domestic production but faces implementation uncertainties and reflects Trump’s ongoing trade war expanding into cinema.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • President Donald Trump announced a 100% tariff on foreign-made films, claiming it poses a national security threat to Hollywood.
  • Trump criticized other countries for attracting U.S. filmmakers with incentives, stating, "This is a concerted effort by other nations and, therefore, a national security threat."
  • Hollywood faces significant challenges, with production down 26% last year compared to 2021, as per ProdPro data.
  • The U.S. box office gross has significantly decreased, falling from just under $12 billion in 2018 to just over $2 billion in 2020 due to the pandemic.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™