Trump threatens Insurrection Act amid National Guard troop deployments


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Presidential authority

President Donald Trump has stated he is prepared to invoke the Insurrection Act if needed, particularly if courts or local officials block his deployment of National Guard troops nationwide.

Legal and political disputes

Lawsuits have been filed by the state of Illinois and the city of Chicago, as well as the state of Oregon, challenging the Trump administration’s deployment of National Guard troops.

Use of the Insurrection Act

The Insurrection Act of 1807 allows the president to deploy the military for civilian law enforcement under limited circumstances. It was last used during the 1992 Los Angeles riots. President Trump referenced unrest in Portland, stating, "If you take a look at what’s been going on in Portland, it’s been going on for a long time, and that’s insurrection."


Full story

President Donald Trump has threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act. He said he’ll do it “if necessary,” specifically, if courts or local officials try to block his deployment of National Guard troops across the nation.

“We have an Insurrection Act for a reason. If I had to enact it, I’d do that,” the president said in the Oval Office on Monday. “If people were being killed and courts were holding us up or governors or mayors were holding us up, sure, I would do that, I mean, I want to make sure that people aren’t killed. We have to make sure that our cities are safe.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The Insurrection Act of 1807 allows the president to deploy the military for civilian law enforcement purposes under limited circumstances. It was last used during the 1992 Los Angeles riots.

Trump made the comments when talking about his efforts to federalize troops in Democratic-run cities. As of Tuesday, the president has ordered National Guard troops to Chicago, Portland, Oregon, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.

Trump specifically addressed Portland in an interview with Newsmax on Monday night, saying there’s an insurrection in Portland.

“If we don’t have to use it, I wouldn’t use it,” Trump said before adding, “If you take a look at what’s been going on in Portland, it’s been going on for a long time, and that’s insurrection. I mean, that’s pure insurrection.”

Illinois lawsuit against Trump administration

The president’s comments come after Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker accused the administration of staging a “military-style invasion” of Chicago.

The state and the city filed a lawsuit Monday to block the federalization of the Illinois Guard.

“There is no invasion here. There is no insurrection here. And local and state law enforcement are on the job and managing what they need to,” Pritzker said. “Without my permission and against my vigorous objections, the president has federalized 300 Illinois National Guard military troops and hundreds of National Guard members from Texas.”

The governor continued, saying, “Let me be clear: Donald Trump is using our service members as political props and as pawns in his illegal effort to militarize our nation’s cities.”

The Department of Homeland Security responded, calling Pritzker’s claims a “smorgasbord of lies” and saying he should “get out of his mansion and see Chicago.”

“If J.B. Pritzker actually walked the streets of his own city, he would see domestic terrorists and violent rioters attacking police officers and the scourge of violent crime as a direct result of his own policies.” 

Oregon lawsuit

Oregon filed a similar lawsuit last week. Over the weekend, a judge issued a ruling, temporarily blocking the Trump administration from deploying National Guard members from California or other states to the streets of Portland.

The judge’s temporary order remains in effect until Oct. 18 as the Trump administration appeals the case

In the ruling, the judge accused the White House of circumventing federal law and violating the Constitution by using the military when no significant threat or insurrection existed.

Jason K. Morrell (Morning Managing Editor), Emma Stoltzfus (Video Editor), and Devan Markham (Morning Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

President Donald Trump’s threat to invoke the Insurrection Act amid disputes with courts and local officials over National Guard deployments raises questions about presidential powers, federal intervention in cities and the balance between law enforcement and civil liberties.

Presidential authority

The story highlights debates over the scope of presidential powers under the Insurrection Act, which allows federal troops to be deployed domestically, and whether current circumstances justify such an action.

Federal and state relations

Ongoing lawsuits and opposition from state and city leaders underscore tensions between federal authority and local control, especially regarding the deployment of military forces in Democratic-led cities.

Civil rights and legal challenges

Federal court decisions, legal arguments from states and public concern reflect broader questions about constitutional rights, lawful limits on military use in law enforcement, and the implications for protests and civil liberties.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 101 media outlets

Behind the numbers

The Insurrection Act has been used only about 30 times in U.S. history. A CBS poll cited by some center and left-leaning sources reports 58 percent of Americans oppose deploying the National Guard to U.S. cities for law enforcement.

Global impact

Internationally, the use of federal troops in U.S. cities draws scrutiny over American democratic practices and is reported in global media as a potential shift in domestic policy affecting U.S. relations and reputation.

Policy impact

The proposed invocation of the Insurrection Act would centralize federal authority over local law enforcement, raising concerns about constitutional checks and balances and potentially impacting civil liberties in affected communities.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame Trump's consideration of the Insurrection Act as "unhinged despotism" and "encroaching fascism," portraying deployments of about 200 National Guard troops to Portland as an "invasion and occupation" of peaceful protests, emphasizing authoritarian overreach and parallels to his January 6 impeachment for hypocrisy.
  • Media outlets in the center adopt more conditional tones, like "threatens," blending explanation with subtle negativity.
  • Media outlets on the right highlight "pure insurrection" and "lawlessness" in Democrat-run cities like Portland and Chicago, presenting the same troop numbers as essential protection against surging crime and "burning hellhole" chaos, justifying federal intervention as lawful order restoration.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

101 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • President Donald Trump stated he might invoke the Insurrection Act to address civil unrest, facing criticism from legal experts who accuse him of trying to create disorder to justify authoritarian actions.
  • Local leaders, including Oregon Governor Tina Kotek, emphasized there is no insurrection in Portland and criticized Trump's deployment of federal troops as unnecessary and unconstitutional.
  • A federal judge blocked Trump's plans to send federalized National Guard troops to Portland, prompting concerns about potential violations of constitutional rights against peaceful protesters.
  • Critics, including Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, argue Trump's tactics politicize law enforcement and threaten civil liberties in Democratic-led cities like Portland and Chicago.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • President Donald Trump stated that an "insurrection" is occurring in Portland, Oregon, as he considers deploying the National Guard to the city due to rising crime.
  • U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut blocked Trump's efforts to deploy the National Guard, stating the action circumvents earlier orders.
  • The Insurrection Act of 1807, which allows the president to federalize National Guard units, may be invoked if necessary, according to Trump.
  • Oregon, California, and Illinois are suing the Trump administration over National Guard deployments amid ongoing legal challenges to his actions.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

By entering your email, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.