Trump v. Harvard: Administration escalates fight against Ivy League school


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Funding battle

The Trump administration is canceling the last $100 million in federal contracts with Harvard University over alleged discrimination on campus.

Trump threats

President Trump said he may divert billions in research grants from Harvard to trade schools.

Harvard fights back

Alan Garber, the president of Harvard, said cutting research grants hurts the entire nation, not just the university.


Full story

The Trump administration has escalated its battle against Harvard University, canceling all remaining contracts with the elite Ivy League institution as President Donald Trump threatened to divert research grants to trade schools. The administration claims that Harvard has failed to protect Jewish students from antisemitism and has illegally given preferences in admissions to racial minorities.

However, Harvard and its supporters say the fight threatens both academic freedom and the future of scientific discovery at the nation’s top universities.

“What is perplexing is the measures they have taken to address this don’t even hit the same people that they believe are causing the problems,” Harvard’s president, Alan Garber, told NPR. “Why cut off research funding? Sure, it hurts Harvard. But it hurts the country.”

The case against Harvard

The General Services Administration sent a letter to all federal agencies on Tuesday, May 27, instructing them to terminate any contracts with Harvard that had not already been pulled.

Those contracts are worth about $100 million, according to The New York Times, which obtained a draft of the letter. That amount is in addition to the $3.2 billion in grants and contracts that have been frozen over the past several weeks.

The letter — signed by Josh Gruenbaum, the commissioner of the federal acquisition service — detailed the Trump administration’s case against Harvard, including “a disturbing lack of concern for the safety and wellbeing of Jewish students.”

Gruenbaum cited what he called “shocking, to say the least” racial discrimination in Harvard’s admissions policies. He wrote that among applicants who placed in the top 10% of their high school graduating classes, the admission rate for Black applicants was 56%, compared to 31% for Hispanics, 15% for whites and 13% for those of Asian descent.

He suggested this has led to a diminution of the university’s academic standards.

Unbiased. Straight Facts.TM

The Trump administration has frozen about $3.3 billion in grants and contracts with Harvard University. Most of the money went toward biomedical research.

“Harvard has shown no indication of reforming their admissions process – to the contrary, Harvard now has to offer a remedial math course, which has been described as ‘middle school math,’ for incoming freshmen,” Gruenbaum wrote. “These are the direct results of employing discriminatory factors, instead of merit, in admission decisions.”

He also complained that the Harvard Divinity School selected a student who participated in a pro-Palestinian protest on campus last year as a “class marshal” for this spring’s commencement and that the Harvard Law Review offered a $65,000 fellowship to a protester accused of assaulting a Jewish student on campus.

Gruenbaum did not mention that the protester avoided criminal prosecution on a misdemeanor assault charge that was filed after he confronted a student filming a protest. The case was resolved without the protester having to admit wrongdoing, according to The Harvard Crimson.

Gruenbaum said all the episodes reflect an untenable atmosphere on campus perpetuated by the school’s administrators.

“At best, this sort of leadership suggests staggering incompetence; at worst, it’s deliberate malice disguised as ignorance,” he wrote.

‘Troublemakers’

The cancellation of Harvard’s remaining federal contracts comes days after the Trump administration barred the school from admitting international students. About 6,800 international students attended Harvard this year, accounting for 27% of its total enrollment.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem justified the ban by asserting that Harvard is “perpetuating an unsafe environment that is hostile to Jewish students, promotes pro-Hamas sympathies and employs racist ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion policies.’”

On his Truth Social account over the weekend, Trump said the university had refused to identify its international students.

“We are still waiting for the Foreign Student Lists from Harvard so that we can determine, after a ridiculous expenditure of BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, how many radicalized lunatics, troublemakers all, should not be let back into our Country,” Trump wrote. “Harvard is very slow in the presentation of these documents, and probably for good reason!”

In a separate post, Trump said he had plans to reallocate Harvard’s federal grants.

“I am considering taking Three Billion Dollars of Grant Money away from a very antisemitic Harvard, and giving it to TRADE SCHOOLS all across our land,” he wrote. “What a great investment that would be for the USA, and so badly needed!!!”

Reuters reported, however, that most of the federal money flowing to Harvard was awarded by the National Institutes of Health for biomedical research.

‘Their fire is misdirected’

Harvard has sued the Trump administration, asking a court to reinstate its federal funding. On Friday, May 23, a federal judge temporarily restored the university’s ability to enroll international students.

Garber told NPR that the school wants to address some issues raised by White House officials, particularly the contention that conservative voices on campus are often stifled.

“We want people to be able to address difficult topics with one another, especially when they disagree,” Garber said. “We shouldn’t be in an echo chamber. Everyone in our community needs to hear other views.”

But he said the attacks on Harvard and other elite institutions are part of a larger cultural battle that has little to do with the universities themselves.

“They don’t like what’s happening on campuses and sometimes they don’t like what we represent,” Garber said. “There are people who would like to see these universities brought down. I think that their fire is misdirected, because we have a common interest in making the nation and indeed the world a better place.”

Bast Bramhall (Video Editor) and Devin Pavlou (Digital Producer) contributed to this report.
Tags: , , , , ,

Why this story matters

The federal government's decision to terminate all remaining contracts with Harvard University highlights escalating tensions between the administration and higher education institutions over issues including antisemitism, admissions practices and academic freedom, with potential nationwide implications for research, funding and university autonomy.

Federal funding and research

The withdrawal of federal contracts and grants from Harvard raises questions about the future of scientific research and the national impact of shifting government support away from major academic institutions.

Campus climate and antisemitism

Allegations concerning Harvard's handling of antisemitism on campus are central to the administration's actions, focusing national attention on how universities address student safety and discrimination.

Admissions policies and academic standards

Debates over the fairness and legality of race-conscious admissions practices at elite universities are at the heart of the dispute, with both the administration and Harvard presenting differing views on what constitutes merit and equity in higher education.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 235 media outlets

Community reaction

Harvard students, faculty and administrators have responded with anxiety and concern about the broader implications, especially regarding research programs and international students. According to some sources, university leadership and students view these actions as a threat to academic freedom and the openness of U.S. higher education. Others view them as justified measures to address policy disagreements.

Context corner

Historically, the federal government has provided substantial funding to elite research universities like Harvard, supporting scientific research and international academic exchange. Recent political disputes over university governance, race-based admissions, and campus protests have escalated federal intervention. This marks a departure from prior policy norms and reflects wider cultural and ideological divisions over higher education’s role in society.

Underreported

While most articles focus on the Trump administration’s legal and financial measures against Harvard, there is comparatively little coverage of the long-term impact on federally funded scientific research and innovation, or on the ripple effects at non-elite universities potentially affected by similar future government interventions.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left cast the Trump administration’s cancellation of $100 million in federal contracts with Harvard as a retaliatory attack undermining academic freedom and critical medical research, employing charged terms like “intense attacks” and “retaliatory cancellation” that convey victimization and constitutional concern.
  • Media outlets in the center adopt a more factual tone, de-emphasizing emotional framing and focusing on procedural elements of contract termination.
  • Media outlets on the right frame the move as a justified enforcement against Harvard’s alleged ongoing discrimination and antisemitism, using assertive language such as “yank,” “cut,” and “champion principles of nondiscrimination” to emphasize lawfulness and protection of taxpayer money.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

235 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • The Trump administration is directing federal agencies to cancel contracts with Harvard University, totaling about $100 million, as reported by a senior administration official.
  • A letter from the U.S. General Services Administration was sent to agencies, directing them to assess their contracts and consider other vendors by June 6.
  • Harvard University is currently involved in a lawsuit against the Trump administration, challenging its funding freeze and other demands.
  • The Trump administration claims Harvard has not adequately protected Jewish students and is engaging in race discrimination.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • The Trump administration is canceling all federal contracts with Harvard University, worth around $100 million in total.
  • Agencies have been instructed to find alternative vendors for the services Harvard supplies.
  • The move escalates a dispute over Harvard's governance, admissions, and student discipline processes.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The Trump administration plans to terminate all remaining federal contracts with Harvard University, estimated at $100 million, as noted in a letter from the General Services Administration on Tuesday.
  • Harvard claims that the administration's actions violate its First Amendment rights and undermine its educational mission, according to a spokesperson.
  • President Donald Trump suggested redirecting federal grants from Harvard to trade schools, referencing issues of antisemitism and discrimination in a recent social media post.
  • Agencies have been instructed to submit a list of cancellations by June 6, according to the letter from the General Services Administration.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

Timeline