Trump’s flag-burning order draws rare rebuke from conservatives


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Summary

Executive order

President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing the Justice Department to prosecute people who burn the American flag. The order also instructs Attorney General Pam Bondi to challenge the Supreme Court's 1989 ruling that defines flag burning as protected speech under the First Amendment.

Conservative pushback

Shortly after the executive order was signed, several conservative commentators voiced their opposition. Radio host Dana Loesch described flag burning as "vile" but argued, 'the government has no right to control speech or expression.'

Recent events

On the same day as the executive order, a U.S. veteran identifying as a 20-year-old combat veteran was arrested outside the White House after setting an American flag on fire.


Full story

A new executive order from President Donald Trump has sparked backlash from his own party. On Monday, Trump signed an order directing the Justice Department to prosecute people who burn the American flag.

The order also calls on Attorney General Pam Bondi to challenge the Supreme Court’s 1989 ruling that flag burning is a form of protected speech.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

“Burning this representation of America may incite violence and riot,” the order reads. “American Flag burning is also used by groups of foreign nationals as a calculated act to intimidate and threaten violence against Americans because of their nationality and place of birth.”

The order states that the court has never considered flag-burning to be an action that could incite “imminent lawless action.” It states flag burning could be perceived as a form of “fighting words.”

Immediate pushback

Shortly after Trump signed the order, Conservative commentators pushed back.

Radio host Dana Loesch called flag-burning vile, but said the government has no right to control speech or expression.

Commentator Erik Erikson wrote, “It is well-settled constitutional law,” and that “the executive does not get to create crimes.”

Meanwhile, Colin Wright posted on X with his own thoughts. He said, “I would never burn the American flag because of what it symbolizes to me. But the act of banning the burning of it runs more contrary to American values than the burning itself ever could.”

Radio host Jesse Kelly warned the order had him, “As close as I’ll ever be to lighting one on fire.”

The same day Trump signed the order, officials arrested a U.S. veteran outside the White House after he set an American flag on fire.

The man identified himself as a 20-year-old combat veteran.

Protecting the flag from ‘desecration’

When Trump signed the order, the White House also shared a fact sheet. It mentions recent protests in Los Angeles, where protesters burned American flags “alongside violent acts and other conduct threatening public safety.”

First Amendment freedoms

In 1989, the Supreme Court found that the government cannot prohibit expression because it is offensive to some, affirming that political demonstrations are a fundamental right.

Trump spoke about the order, saying, “All over the country they’re burning flags. All over the world, they burn the American flag.”

The fact sheet states that these actions disrespect the sacrifices that service members have made for the U.S.

Previous debate over flag-burning

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled decades ago that flag burning is a form of symbolic speech. It said the action is protected under the First Amendment.

Even the late Justice Antonin Scalia, a known conservative, was in the majority.

Critics said Trump’s order is more symbolic than substantive. They said it’ll likely face swift legal challenges and reignite the debate over free speech.

Tags: , ,

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Why this story matters

President Donald Trump's executive order seeking to criminalize flag burning raises constitutional questions about free speech, highlights divisions within his own party and brings renewed attention to longstanding debates over the limits of First Amendment protections.

Free speech and the First Amendment

The executive order challenges a Supreme Court precedent that protects flag burning as free speech, reviving critical discussions about the constitutional limits on government regulation of expression.

Political and party division

Conservative commentators and members of Trump's party have expressed opposition to the order, indicating internal disagreements about government authority to curtail expression and the principle of free speech.

Legal and symbolic actions

Critics and legal experts note that the order is likely to face swift legal challenges and may be more symbolic in nature, underscoring ongoing debates about policy gestures versus substantive change.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 171 media outlets

History lesson

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Texas v. Johnson (1989) and U.S. v. Eichman (1990) that flag burning is protected as symbolic speech, consistently overturning legislative attempts to criminalize it. Bail reform has a track record of not spiking crime in states and cities where it's been implemented.

Policy impact

The challenge to flag burning as free speech may spur legal battles and potential immigration repercussions for non-citizens.

Quote bank

"If you burn a flag, you get one year in jail. You don’t get 10 years, you don’t get one month" – Donald Trump. "The government can't prosecute protected expressive activity—even if many Americans, including the president, find it 'uniquely offensive and provocative'" – Bob Corn-Revere, FIRE.

SAN provides
Unbiased. Straight Facts.

Don’t just take our word for it.


Certified balanced reporting

According to media bias experts at AllSides

AllSides Certified Balanced May 2025

Transparent and credible

Awarded a perfect reliability rating from NewsGuard

100/100

Welcome back to trustworthy journalism.

Find out more

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

171 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Aug. 25, 2025, to prosecute individuals for burning American flags, despite a Supreme Court ruling that protects such actions as free speech under the First Amendment.
  • The order directs the Attorney General to prioritize prosecutions related to flag burning, especially when linked to other crimes.
  • The order could lead to visa revocation for foreign nationals who burn flags.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • On Monday, President Donald Trump signed executive orders ending cashless bail in Washington, D.C., and directing the Justice Department to prosecute flag burning.
  • These actions respond to concerns over crime and flag desecration despite the 1989 Supreme Court ruling protecting flag burning as free speech.
  • Trump stated that flag burning will be punishable by one year in jail with no early release, and federal law enforcement can deploy nationwide on less than 24 hours' notice.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • The executive order requires Attorney General Pam Bondi to identify jurisdictions that have eliminated cash bail, with the aim of ending cashless bail systems across the country.
  • The order asserts that desecrating the American flag is offensive, threatening and undermines national unity.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Daily Newsletter

Start your day with fact-based news

Start your day with fact-based news

Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.