
US troops could detain migrants under proposed militarized border zone
By Craig Nigrelli (Anchor), William Jackson (Producer), Snorre Wik (Video Editor)
- Trump administration officials considered establishing a temporary military-controlled zone along the U.S.-Mexico border. The zone would span 60 feet of federal land.
- Over 10,000 active-duty troops are already engaged in border security efforts, with recent deployments including armored vehicles and a U.S. Navy destroyer.
- Illegal crossings declined to 28,654 in February 2025 from 124,522 in December 2024, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Administration officials attributed the drop to increased military presence and stricter enforcement, though migration patterns fluctuate seasonally.
Full Story
The Trump administration will review a plan to establish a military-controlled buffer zone along the U.S.-Mexico border. According to U.S. officials, the plan would authorize the military to temporarily hold migrants who cross illegally while awaiting transfer to law enforcement.

Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- President Donald Trump is evaluating plans for the Department of Defense to create a buffer zone at the U.S.-Mexico border, as reported by The Washington Post.
- Democratic lawmakers expressed strong opposition to the military using installations as migrant detention centers, arguing it misuses defense resources and undermines national security.
- The Trump administration is establishing a deportation hub at Fort Bliss capable of holding up to 10,000 immigrants during proceedings, with future expansions planned in other states.
- The lawmakers' letter warns that the plan could cost billions and disrupt military readiness, emphasizing the need for timely answers regarding operational impacts.
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Right
Untracked Bias
If approved, the move would mark the most significant military involvement in border enforcement under Trump, raising legal questions about the Posse Comitatus Act, which limits active-duty troops from engaging in domestic law enforcement.
Officials said the administration is exploring ways to classify the buffer zone as a military installation, framing migrant apprehensions as trespassing rather than law enforcement actions.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
Where would the buffer zone be established?
The proposed buffer zone would span a 60-foot-wide strip of federal land along the southern border, known as the Roosevelt Reservation.
Former President Theodore Roosevelt designated this land for border security in 1907.
The buffer could extend from New Mexico to California, with officials considering its expansion westward if deemed successful.
Unlike in Texas, where Gov. Greg Abbott has deployed National Guard troops to assist in detaining migrants, military involvement in border enforcement in New Mexico has been more limited.
The Defense Department has already transferred parts of this federal land to the Pentagon for border security efforts.
How would the military’s role at the border change?
The plan would expand the military’s role beyond surveillance and logistical support, allowing active-duty troops to temporarily hold migrants until Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents take custody.
Officials are evaluating whether unauthorized crossings in the buffer zone could be classified as trespassing rather than standard immigration violations.
What legal challenges could the plan face?
Legal experts warned the plan could violate the Posse Comitatus Act.
While the Trump administration has previously relied on CBP and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to process detainees, placing military personnel in direct contact with migrants could trigger legal scrutiny.
Critics argued that the plan could face legal challenges under the Posse Comitatus Act. Immigration rights groups have also raised concerns over the human rights implications of expanded military presence at the border.
What other military actions has Trump ordered at the border?
Since returning to office, Trump has expanded military involvement at the border. According to U.S. military officials, more than 10,000 active-duty service members are now engaged in border security efforts.
Earlier this month, the Pentagon established a joint task force at Fort Huachuca, Arizona, to oversee operations. It deployed 2,400 troops from the Army’s 4th Infantry Division, including units equipped with 20-ton armored Stryker combat vehicles.
Defense officials will evaluate whether these vehicles can effectively maneuver within the buffer zone.
Additionally, the Trump administration recently deployed the USS Gravely, a U.S. Navy destroyer, to patrol waters near the southern border. The vessel operates alongside U.S. Coast Guard units to enforce maritime border security, part of broader efforts to curb unauthorized migration and drug trafficking.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
What impact has Trump’s border policy had so far?
Illegal crossings have declined significantly since Trump returned to office.
CBP reported 28,654 crossings in February 2025, down from 124,522 in December 2024 under former President Joe Biden. Trump administration officials credited increased military presence and stricter enforcement for the drop.
Trump’s latest immigration directives include expanding deportation flights, increasing border security technology and proposing military detention sites for undocumented migrants.
His defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, has endorsed the aggressive approach, stating, “We have defended other places and other spaces. We will defend this line.”
The administration’s push for “100% operational control” remains a central priority, with officials continuing to evaluate legal, logistical and diplomatic challenges tied to militarizing immigration enforcement.
[craig nigrelli]
THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION IS EVALUATING A PLAN TO CREATE A 60-FOOT-WIDE MILITARY-CONTROLLED BUFFER ZONE ALONG THE U.S.-MEXICO BORDER. ACCORDING TO THE WASHINGTON POST, THE ZONE WOULD STRETCH FROM NEW MEXICO TO CALIFORNIA. THE PLAN WOULD ALLOW ACTIVE-DUTY TROOPS TO TEMPORARILY HOLD MIGRANTS UNTIL BORDER PATROL AGENTS ARRIVE.
THE POST SAYS THE WHITE HOUSE IS INVOLVED IN DISCUSSIONS BUT IT’S UNCLEAR IF IT HAS TRUMP’S APPROVAL. SOME OFFICIALS ARGUE THE PLAN COULD EXPEDITE DEPORTATIONS AND INCREASE PENALTIES FOR UNAUTHORIZED CROSSINGS.
THE PROPOSAL FOLLOWS TRUMP’S PUSH TO SECURE THE BORDER, INCLUDING THE RECENT DEPLOYMENT OF THOUSANDS OF ACTIVE-DUTY SERVICE MEMBERS. MORE THAN 10,000 TROOPS NOW TAKE PART IN BORDER OPERATIONS, AND THE ADMINISTRATION SENT A NAVY DESTROYER, THE USS GRAVELY, TO SUPPORT SECURITY OPERATIONS.
DEFENSE SECRETARY PETE HEGSETH ENDORSES DEPLOYING MILITARY RESOURCES FOR BORDER SECURITY, CALLING IT ESSENTIAL TO NATIONAL DEFENSE. THE ADMINISTRATION ALSO PROPOSES EXPANDING MILITARY DETENTION FACILITIES FOR MIGRANTS, INCLUDING AT GUANTÁNAMO BAY. WHILE NO DETAINEES REMAIN, OFFICIALS SAY FUTURE “HIGH-THREAT” MIGRANTS COULD BE SENT THERE DESPITE LEGAL CHALLENGES AND CONCERNS OVER COST, LOGISTICS, AND HUMAN RIGHTS.
THE PENTAGON IS EVALUATING THE LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE BUFFER ZONE, WITH CONCERNS THAT IT COULD VIOLATE THE POSSE COMITATUS ACT, WHICH BARS ACTIVE-DUTY TROOPS FROM ENFORCING CIVILIAN LAW. HOWEVER, SOME OFFICIALS BELIEVE CLASSIFYING THE MILITARY-CONTROLLED AREA AS A TEMPORARY INSTALLATION WOULD PERMIT TROOPS TO HOLD MIGRANTS ON THE BASIS OF TRESPASSING RATHER THAN MAKING FORMAL ARRESTS.
IN TEXAS, WHERE THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OWNS LESS BORDER LAND, NATIONAL GUARD TROOPS DEPLOYED BY GOVERNOR GREG ABBOTT ALREADY DETAIN MIGRANTS. THE DEFENSE DEPARTMENT FORMED A JOINT TASK FORCE TO OVERSEE BORDER OPERATIONS.
FOR MORE OF OUR UNBIASED, STRAIGHT FACT REPORTING – DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP TODAY, OR LOG ON TO SAN.COM.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- President Donald Trump is evaluating plans for the Department of Defense to create a buffer zone at the U.S.-Mexico border, as reported by The Washington Post.
- Democratic lawmakers expressed strong opposition to the military using installations as migrant detention centers, arguing it misuses defense resources and undermines national security.
- The Trump administration is establishing a deportation hub at Fort Bliss capable of holding up to 10,000 immigrants during proceedings, with future expansions planned in other states.
- The lawmakers' letter warns that the plan could cost billions and disrupt military readiness, emphasizing the need for timely answers regarding operational impacts.
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Kevin Carter/Getty Images
DHL suspends global shipments of more than $800 to US customers
Watch 2:054 hrs ago -
Budrul Chukrut/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
Sensitive docs including WH floor plans shared with thousands: Report
Watch 2:427 hrs ago -
FPG via Getty Images
China tests hydrogen-based bomb that burns hotter, longer than TNT
Watch 2:397 hrs ago -
REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
El Salvador offers prisoner swap to Venezuela involving US deportees
Watch 1:0810 hrs ago